๐Ÿ“Š Financial Breakdown

CategoryAmount (Approx)
Official Budget TBA
Worldwide Gross TBA
IMDb Ratingโ˜… 4.9 / 10

๐Ÿ“œ Detailed Financial Report

With its release in 1966, Isadora Duncan, the Biggest Dancer in the World aimed to make a significant impact on the box office charts. Production insiders estimate the budget to be around an undisclosed amount. This figure typically includes principal photography, talent fees, and post-production costs, but often excludes marketing and distribution expenses which can add another 30-50% to the total investment.

๐Ÿ“ˆ Collection Trajectory

The box office journey for Isadora Duncan, the Biggest Dancer in the World has culminated in a worldwide gross of approximately TBA. The figures indicate a competitive response, with the film navigating a complex theatrical landscape.

โš–๏ธ Profitability & Verdict

In the modern film economy, theatrical revenue is just one slice of the pie. However, it remains the primary indicator of a film's "Hit" or "Flop" status. Based on the reported numbers and audience reception (4.9/10), Isadora Duncan, the Biggest Dancer in the World is effectively categorized as a Financial Disappointment.

๐Ÿ” Comparables

Among the Documentary offerings of 1966, this film occupy a unique position, reflecting current viewer trends. Its performance will likely influence studio decisions for future projects in this category.

โ“ Frequently Asked Questions

How much did Isadora Duncan, the Biggest Dancer in the World earn at the box office?

Isadora Duncan, the Biggest Dancer in the World has grossed approximately TBA worldwide as of our latest data updating this 1966 report.

What was the production budget for Isadora Duncan, the Biggest Dancer in the World?

The reported production cost for Isadora Duncan, the Biggest Dancer in the World was roughly TBA, excluding marketing and distribution.

Is Isadora Duncan, the Biggest Dancer in the World a box office hit or flop?

Based on its worldwide collection of TBA against a budget of TBA, the film's rating is 4.9/10, indicating it was a financial disappointment.