Appointment with Crime Ending Explained: Small-time jewel thief Leo Martin is deserted by his partners-in-crime, club owner Gus Loman and driver Hatchett, when the robbery they are committing goes wrong. Directed by John Harlow, this 1946 crime film stars William Hartnell (Leo Martin), alongside Raymond Lovell as Gus Loman, Robert Beatty as Det. Insp. Rogers, Herbert Lom as Gregory Lang. With a 6.2/10 rating, the ending has divided audiences.

What Happens at the End of Appointment with Crime?

Small-time jewel thief Leo Martin is deserted by his partners-in-crime, club owner Gus Loman and driver Hatchett, when the robbery they are committing goes wrong. After serving his prison sentence, Leo emerges with an intricate plan for revenge. Leo implicates Loman, as well as his amoral boss, Gregory Lang, for murder -- but Inspector Rogers suspects Leo.

John Harlow's narrative builds toward a resolution centered on William Hartnell (Leo Martin)'s journey. After serving his prison sentence, Leo emerges with an intricate plan for revenge.

How Does William Hartnell (Leo Martin)'s Story End?

  • William Hartnell: William Hartnell's storyline wraps up in the final act, though some viewers have found the resolution more ambiguous than expected.
  • Raymond Lovell (Gus Loman): Raymond Lovell's role in the climax proves pivotal to how the central conflict resolves.
  • Robert Beatty (Det. Insp. Rogers): Robert Beatty's character undergoes a significant shift in the final act.

What Does the Ending of Appointment with Crime Mean?

Appointment with Crime's ending attempts to resolve the major plot threads, though some narrative elements involving William Hartnell may feel rushed. John Harlow's final act has been both praised for its ambition and criticized for its execution.