Cardinal Richelieu Ending Explained: What Happened and Why?
Complete breakdown of the climax, final twists, and spoilers for Cardinal Richelieu.
Cardinal Richelieu Ending Explained: The cunning Cardinal Richelieu must save King Louis XIII from treachery within his inner circle. Directed by Rowland V. Lee, this 1935 history film stars George Arliss (Cardinal Richelieu), alongside Edward Arnold as Louis XIII, Maureen O'Sullivan as Lenore, Cesar Romero as Andre de Pons. Rated 7.3/10 by audiences, the conclusion brings the story to a satisfying close.
What Happens at the End of Cardinal Richelieu?
The cunning Cardinal Richelieu must save King Louis XIII from treachery within his inner circle.
How Does George Arliss (Cardinal Richelieu)'s Story End?
- George Arliss: George Arliss's arc reaches a definitive conclusion by the final act, with Rowland V. Lee delivering a resolution that feels earned after the film's 1h 22m runtime.
- Edward Arnold (Louis XIII): Edward Arnold's role in the climax proves pivotal to how the central conflict resolves.
- Maureen O'Sullivan (Lenore): Maureen O'Sullivan's character undergoes a significant shift in the final act.
Is Cardinal Richelieu Based on a True Story?
Yes — Cardinal Richelieu draws from real events. The ending reflects documented outcomes, though Rowland V. Lee has taken creative liberties in dramatizing specific scenes for cinematic impact.
What Does the Ending of Cardinal Richelieu Mean?
The ending of Cardinal Richelieu ties together the narrative threads involving George Arliss. Rowland V. Lee chooses a conclusion that prioritizes thematic consistency over surprise, resulting in an ending that rewards viewers who engaged with the story's central themes.