The Boston Strangler Ending Explained: What Happened and Why?

What Happens at the End of The Boston Strangler?

Boston is being terrorized by a series of seemingly random murders of women. Based on the true story, the film follows the investigators path through several leads before introducing the Strangler as a character. It is seen almost exclusively from the point of view of the investigators who have very few clues to build a case upon.

Richard Fleischer's narrative builds toward a resolution centered on Tony Curtis (Albert DeSalvo)'s journey. Based on the true story, the film follows the investigators path through several leads before introducing the Strangler as a character.

How Does Tony Curtis (Albert DeSalvo)'s Story End?

• Tony Curtis: Tony Curtis's storyline wraps up in the final act, though some viewers have found the resolution more ambiguous than expected.
• Henry Fonda (John S. Bottomly): Henry Fonda's role in the climax proves pivotal to how the central conflict resolves.
• George Kennedy (Det. Phil DiNatale): George Kennedy's character undergoes a significant shift in the final act.

Is The Boston Strangler Based on a True Story?

Yes — The Boston Strangler draws from real events. The ending reflects documented outcomes, though Richard Fleischer has taken creative liberties in dramatizing specific scenes for cinematic impact.

What Does the Ending of The Boston Strangler Mean?

The Boston Strangler's ending attempts to resolve the major plot threads, though some narrative elements involving Tony Curtis may feel rushed. Richard Fleischer's final act has been both praised for its ambition and criticized for its execution.