Waiter No. 5 Ending Explained: After conducting a raid on a Rebel camp, a Czarist officer discovers that his wife has joined the revolutionaries. Directed by D.W. Griffith, this 1910 drama film stars George Nichols (The Chief of Police), alongside Claire McDowell as The Chief of Police's Wife, Jack Pickford as The Chief of Police's Son (as a boy), Charles West as The Chief of Police's Son (as an adult). Rated 0/10, the conclusion has sparked discussion among viewers.

What Happens at the End of Waiter No. 5?

After conducting a raid on a Rebel camp, a Czarist officer discovers that his wife has joined the revolutionaries. Out of loyalty to his wife, the officer resigns his commission and escapes with her to America. Several years later, the ex-officer is gainfully employed as a waiter in a Russian restaurant. For the sake of his grown son, who is engaged to marry a wealthy socialite, our hero pretends to be a man of great wealth and prestige. The truth is revealed in the final scene, but "Waiter Number 5" is saved from disgrace by the timely arrival of his former superior officer.

D.W. Griffith's narrative builds toward a resolution centered on George Nichols (The Chief of Police)'s journey. Out of loyalty to his wife, the officer resigns his commission and escapes with her to America.

How Does George Nichols (The Chief of Police)'s Story End?

  • George Nichols: George Nichols's storyline wraps up in the final act, though some viewers have found the resolution more ambiguous than expected.
  • Claire McDowell (The Chief of Police's Wife): Claire McDowell's role in the climax proves pivotal to how the central conflict resolves.
  • Jack Pickford (The Chief of Police's Son (as a boy)): Jack Pickford's character undergoes a significant shift in the final act.

What Does the Ending of Waiter No. 5 Mean?

The ending of Waiter No. 5 brings the narrative to a close, though viewer reception has been mixed. The resolution of George Nichols's story may not satisfy all audiences.