Casse-tête chinois pour le judoka backdrop
VERDICT: Disaster
Expert Verified

Is Casse-tête chinois pour le judoka a Hit or Flop? Official Box Office Record & Profit Analysis

The official verdict is out. With a worldwide gross of $30,000,000.00, Casse-tête chinois pour le judoka is declared a Disaster.

📊 Box Office Snapshot

Budget$50,000,000.00
Box Office$30,000,000.00
Profit / Loss -$20,000,000.00
Return on Investment (ROI) -40%

* A movie is generally considered a "Hit" if it recovers its budget and marketing costs (approx 2x budget).

📔 Detailed Verdict Analysis

📜 Detailed Financial Report

Casse-tête chinois pour le judoka, released in 1967, entered the cinematic marketplace as a Adventure film. The production path for this project involved significant capital, with a reported budget of approximately $50,000,000.00. In the modern film economy, recovering such an investment requires a multifaceted theatrical strategy spanning domestic and international territories.

📈 Collection Trajectory

The box office journey for Casse-tête chinois pour le judoka has culminated in a worldwide gross of approximately $30,000,000.00. This figure represents the total theatrical footprint, reflecting a Return on Investment (ROI) of -40%. Despite the hype, the ticket sales faced headwinds, resulting in a total that fell short of the necessary threshold for theatrical profitability.

⚖️ Profitability & Verdict

Analyzing the multiplier effect and market sentiment, Casse-tête chinois pour le judoka navigated the competitive landscape with an audience reception score of 4.5/10. When weighing the production costs against the global returns, Casse-tête chinois pour le judoka is effectively categorized as a Disaster. This result will likely prompt a re-evaluation of budget strategies for similar genre entries moving forward.

🔍 Comparables

In the context of other Adventure releases, the performance of Casse-tête chinois pour le judoka will likely influence how studios approach similar projects in the future. Whether through its innovative visual style or its narrative choices, the film's financial footprint remains a key piece of the 1967 box office narrative.