Is Hiding at the Bottom of the Sea a Hit or Flop? Official Box Office Record & Profit Analysis

📜 Detailed Financial Report

Marking its arrival in 1965, Hiding at the Bottom of the Sea positioned itself as a Adventure / Action / Family film aiming for mass appeal. The production path for this project involved significant capital, with a reported budget of approximately $50,000,000.00. In the modern film economy, recovering such an investment requires a multifaceted theatrical strategy spanning domestic and international territories.

📈 Collection Trajectory

The box office journey for Hiding at the Bottom of the Sea has culminated in a worldwide gross of approximately $30,000,000.00. This figure represents the total theatrical footprint, reflecting a Return on Investment (ROI) of -40%. The collection trajectory points to a challenging market response, where the theatrical gross struggled to clear the traditional break-even multiplier required for production and marketing recovery.

⚖️ Profitability & Verdict

Analyzing the multiplier effect and market sentiment, Hiding at the Bottom of the Sea navigated the competitive landscape with an audience reception score of 2.8/10. When weighing the production costs against the global returns, Hiding at the Bottom of the Sea is effectively categorized as a Disaster. This result will likely prompt a re-evaluation of budget strategies for similar genre entries moving forward.

🔍 Comparables

In the context of other Adventure releases, the performance of Hiding at the Bottom of the Sea will likely influence how studios approach similar projects in the future. Whether through its innovative visual style or its narrative choices, the film's financial footprint remains a key piece of the 1965 box office narrative.