Anna Karenina backdrop - movieMx Review
Anna Karenina movie poster - Anna Karenina review and rating on movieMx
2012130 minDrama, Romance, History

Anna Karenina

Is Anna Karenina a Hit or Flop?

HIT

Is Anna Karenina worth watching? With a rating of 6.707/10, this Drama, Romance, History film is a must-watch hit for fans of the genre. Read on for our detailed analysis and user reviews.

6.7072,360 votes
RateYour rating
Advertisement

Anna Karenina Synopsis

In Imperial Russia, Anna, wife of the officer Karenin, goes to Moscow to visit her brother. On the way, she meets charming cavalry officer Vronsky, to whom she's immediately attracted. But in St. Petersburg’s high society, a relationship like this could destroy a woman’s reputation.

Advertisement

Top Cast

Keira Knightley
Keira KnightleyAnna Karenina
Jude Law
Jude LawKarenin
Aaron Taylor-Johnson
Aaron Taylor-JohnsonVronsky
Matthew Macfadyen
Matthew MacfadyenOblonsky
Eric MacLennan
Eric MacLennanMatvey
Kelly Macdonald
Kelly MacdonaldDolly
Alicia Vikander
Alicia VikanderKitty
Domhnall Gleeson
Domhnall GleesonLevin
Olivia Williams
Olivia WilliamsCountess Vronsky
Ruth Wilson
Ruth WilsonPrincess Betsy Tverskoy

Official Trailer

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Anna Karenina worth watching?

Anna Karenina has received mixed reviews with a 6.707/10 rating. It might be worth watching if you're a fan of Drama, Romance, History movies.

Is Anna Karenina hit or flop?

Anna Karenina has received average ratings (6.707/10), performing moderately with audiences.

What genre is Anna Karenina?

Anna Karenina is a Drama, Romance, History movie that In Imperial Russia, Anna, wife of the officer Karenin, goes to Moscow to visit her brother. On the way, she meets charming cavalry officer Vronsky, to...

You Might Also Like

Explore More

Critic Reviews

Kenneth Axel CarlssonDec 28, 2014
★ 2

Alright, plot-wise, I might just have to throw in the towel on this one. It is about... people, married, unmarried, love and desire. A lot of characters running in and out of eachothers lives. Since this is based on a famous novel (I think), there must be a lot of summaries out there that can help you along much better than I could. Quite frankly, I was... confused. The whole movie is sort of based at a theater (more or less), where the scenes change constantly. It can be quite spectacular, I must admit, but also... confusing. As a period piece, this movie has paid attention to the details, and everything looks soo good. I can definitely appreciate this, but it seems that all attention has been placed here, on the form. The acting, and actors, fit well here... on the stage. They all act as if they were on a stage, which is fitting. In fact, to be honest, I would have much preferred to see this as a live performance on stage, than here. The story simply drowns in all these costumes and colours, fake trains and stages. _Last words... a good story is more important than anything else. A good story doesn't have to be complicated (just take a look at a movie such as Locke, which is centered around many of the same themes as this). A good story was not important to these people, they just wanted to play around with fancy costumes, beautiful sets and actors who exaggerate. I would surely have skipped this one... had I known._

ekaariAug 9, 2024
★ 8

The stylistic use of the stage drifted between excessive and under-utilised, occasionally falling into perfect balance, of which the ballroom dance scene between Kitty, Vronsky and Anna Karenina is the prime example. The film tells its story closer to the way a ballet’s is told.