Performance & Direction: Blue Review
Last updated: February 25, 2026
Quick Verdict: Hit or Flop?
Is Blue (1993) worth watching? According to our cinematic analysis, the film stands as a HIT with a verified audience rating of 7.1/10. Whether you're looking for the box office collection, ending explained, or parents guide, our review covers everything you need to know about this Documentary.
Cast Performances: A Masterclass
The success of any Documentary is often anchored by its ensemble, and Blue features a noteworthy lineup led by Derek Jarman . Supported by the likes of Nigel Terry and Tilda Swinton , the performances bring a palpable realism to the scripted words.
Performance Analysis: While the cast delivers competent and professional performances, they are occasionally hampered by a script that leans into familiar archetypes.
Final Verdict: Is it Worth Watching?
Story & Plot Summary: Blue
Quick Plot Summary: Released in 1993, Blue is a Documentary, Drama film directed by Derek Jarman. The narrative presents a compelling narrative that engages viewers from start to finish. This summary provides a scannable look at the movie's central conflict involving Derek Jarman.
Ending Explained: Blue
Ending Breakdown: Directed by Derek Jarman, Blue resolves its central conflict while maintaining thematic consistency. The finale has been praised for its approach to documentary resolution.
The emotional climax centers on character transformation involving Derek Jarman, offering viewers material for post-viewing discussion.
Ending Analysis:
- Narrative Resolution: The story concludes with clear resolution of its central conflicts, providing closure while maintaining some ambiguity.
- Character Arcs: Main characters complete meaningful transformations, reflecting the film's thematic priorities.
- Thematic Payoff: The ending reinforces the documentary themes established throughout the runtime.
The final moments of Blue reflect the filmmakers' creative choices, offering an ending that aligns with the film's tone and style.
Who Should Watch Blue?
Worth Watching If You:
- Enjoy Documentaries films and don't mind familiar tropes
- Are a fan of Derek Jarman or the director
- Want solid genre entertainment
Box Office Collection: Blue
| Metric / Region | Collection (Approx) |
|---|---|
| Worldwide Gross | $1.7M |
| Trade Verdict | CLEAN HIT |
Top Cast: Blue
All Cast & Crew →
Where to Watch Blue Online?
Streaming HubBlue Parents Guide & Age Rating
1993 AdvisoryWondering about Blue age rating or if it's safe for kids? Here is our cinematic advisory:
⏱️ Runtime & Duration
The total runtime of Blue is 79 minutes (1h 19m). Ensuring you have enough time for the full cinematic experience.
Verdict Summary
Analyzing the overall audience sentiment, verified rating of 7.1/10, and global performance metrics, Blue is classified as a HIT. It remains an essential part of the 1993 cinematic calendar.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Blue worth watching?
Blue is definitely worth watching if you enjoy Documentary movies. It has a verified rating of 7.1/10 and stands as a HIT in our box office analysis.
Where can I find Blue parents guide and age rating?
The official parents guide for Blue identifies it as Not Rated. Our detailed advisory section above covers all content warnings for families.
What is the total runtime of Blue?
The total duration of Blue is 79 minutes, which is approximately 1h 19m long.
Best Movies to Watch if you liked Blue
How Blue Compares & Where it Ranks
Critic Reviews for Blue
No reviews found for this filter.
movieMx Verified
This review has been verified for accuracy and editorial quality by our senior cinematic analysts.
This analysis is compiled by our editorial experts using multi-source verification and audience sentiment data for maximum accuracy.
