Is Bodily Dysfunctions Worth Watching?
Answer: Maybe not, Bodily Dysfunctions is likely a skip if you enjoy Comedy movies.
It features a runtime of 4 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to general audiences.

Verdict:Bodily Dysfunctions is a confirmed FLOP based on our analysis of audience ratings and box office momentum.
With a rating of 0.0/10, it has delivered a mixed experience for fans of the Comedy, Animation genre.
Answer: Maybe not, Bodily Dysfunctions is likely a skip if you enjoy Comedy movies.
It features a runtime of 4 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to general audiences.
Last updated: January 16, 2026
Released in the dynamic cinematic landscape of 2016, Bodily Dysfunctions emerges as a significant entry in the Comedy, Animation domain. The narrative core of the film focuses on a sophisticated exploration of Animated sketches without actual dialogue that mocks human physical awkwardness, social codes and hidden desires. Unlike standard genre fare, Bodily Dysfunctions attempts to deconstruct traditional tropes, offering a conventional take on its central themes.
The screenplay, appearing to prioritize narrative momentum and immediate impact, sets a stage where the stakes feel personal yet universal. Under the directorial eye of Aisha Madu, every scene is crafted to contribute to the atmospheric weight of the story.
The success of any Comedy is often anchored by its ensemble, and Bodily Dysfunctions features a noteworthy lineup led by Florian Walraven . Supported by the likes of Aisha Madu and , the performances bring a palpable realism to the scripted words.
Performance Analysis: While the cast delivers competent and professional performances, they are occasionally hampered by a script that leans into familiar archetypes. However, their sheer charisma keeps the audience invested. In the broader context of 2016 cinema, these performances stand as a testament to the evolving standards of acting.
From a technical perspective, Bodily Dysfunctions is a marvel of 21st-century filmmaking. The cinematography, utilizing a moody and atmospheric color palette, significantly enhances the world-building aspects of the production.
Technical Excellence: The production design and visual effects provide a solid foundation for the story, ensuring that the world of the film feels lived-in and authentic. Furthermore, the sonic landscape adds a layer of subtextual narrative that rewards attentive viewers.
The structure of Bodily Dysfunctions follows a sophisticated brisk pace. Over its 4 minute duration, the film manages to balance exposition with action in a way that remains consistently entertaining.
Critically, the editing choices help maintain a narrative tension that rarely wavers. The sharp, concise editing ensures that not a single frame is wasted, making the film ideal for a modern audience.
Beyond its immediate entertainment value, Bodily Dysfunctions resonates with contemporary social and cultural themes prevalent in the Comedy landscape of 2026. It addresses concepts such as the nature of heroism and personal legacy with a level of maturity that is often missing from major releases.
In summary, our editorial assessment of Bodily Dysfunctions (2016) is overwhelmingly negative. With an audience rating of 0.0/10, it stands as a highly recommended experience for genre enthusiasts.
Analyzing the audience sentiment, IMDb rating of 0/10, and global collection metrics, Bodily Dysfunctions stands as a challenging project for the creators. It remains an essential piece of the 2016 cinematic year.