Is Broken Meat Worth Watching?
Answer: Yes, Broken Meat is definitely worth watching if you enjoy Documentary movies.
It features a runtime of 50 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to general audiences.
Verdict:Broken Meat is a confirmed FLOP based on our analysis of audience ratings and box office momentum.
With a rating of 6.0/10, it has delivered a mixed experience for fans of the Documentary genre.
Answer: Yes, Broken Meat is definitely worth watching if you enjoy Documentary movies.
It features a runtime of 50 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to general audiences.
Last updated: January 15, 2026
Released in the dynamic cinematic landscape of 1991, Broken Meat emerges as a significant entry in the Documentary domain. The narrative core of the film focuses on a sophisticated exploration of A trip along the seamy edges of New York City and a voyage through the consciousness of the mad beat poet Alan Granville. Unlike standard genre fare, Broken Meat attempts to deconstruct traditional tropes, offering a conventional take on its central themes.
The screenplay, appearing to prioritize narrative momentum and immediate impact, sets a stage where the stakes feel personal yet universal. Under the directorial eye of Pola Rapaport, every scene is crafted to contribute to the atmospheric weight of the story.
The success of any Documentary is often anchored by its ensemble, and Broken Meat features a noteworthy lineup led by Roberto Attanasio . Supported by the likes of Alan Granville and , the performances bring a palpable realism to the scripted words.
Performance Analysis: While the cast delivers competent and professional performances, they are occasionally hampered by a script that leans into familiar archetypes. However, their sheer charisma keeps the audience invested. In the broader context of 1991 cinema, these performances stand as a testament to the evolving standards of acting.
From a technical perspective, Broken Meat is a marvel of 21st-century filmmaking. The cinematography, utilizing a moody and atmospheric color palette, significantly enhances the world-building aspects of the production.
Technical Excellence: The production design and visual effects provide a solid foundation for the story, ensuring that the world of the film feels lived-in and authentic. Furthermore, the sonic landscape adds a layer of subtextual narrative that rewards attentive viewers.
The structure of Broken Meat follows a sophisticated brisk pace. Over its 50 minute duration, the film manages to balance exposition with action in a way that remains consistently entertaining.
Critically, the editing choices help maintain a narrative tension that rarely wavers. The sharp, concise editing ensures that not a single frame is wasted, making the film ideal for a modern audience.
Beyond its immediate entertainment value, Broken Meat resonates with contemporary social and cultural themes prevalent in the Documentary landscape of 2026. It addresses concepts such as the nature of heroism and personal legacy with a level of maturity that is often missing from major releases.
In summary, our editorial assessment of Broken Meat (1991) is overwhelmingly divisive. With an audience rating of 6.0/10, it stands as a highly recommended experience for genre enthusiasts.
Analyzing the audience sentiment, IMDb rating of 6/10, and global collection metrics, Broken Meat stands as a challenging project for the creators. It remains an essential piece of the 1991 cinematic year.
A trip along the seamy edges of New York City and a voyage through the consciousness of the mad beat poet Alan Granville. “Broken Meat” captures Alan’s New York, stripped of its glittering surface: a strange, deserted place.