Bunny Lake Is Missing
Performance & Direction: Bunny Lake Is Missing Review
Last updated: February 25, 2026
Quick Verdict: Hit or Flop?
Is Bunny Lake Is Missing (1965) worth watching? According to our cinematic analysis, the film stands as a HIT with a verified audience rating of 7.2/10. Whether you're looking for the box office collection, ending explained, or parents guide, our review covers everything you need to know about this Mystery.
Cast Performances: A Masterclass
The success of any Mystery is often anchored by its ensemble, and Bunny Lake Is Missing features a noteworthy lineup led by Carol Lynley . Supported by the likes of Laurence Olivier and Keir Dullea , the performances bring a palpable realism to the scripted words.
Performance Analysis: While the cast delivers competent and professional performances, they are occasionally hampered by a script that leans into familiar archetypes.
Final Verdict: Is it Worth Watching?
Story & Plot Summary: Bunny Lake Is Missing
Quick Plot Summary: Released in 1965, Bunny Lake Is Missing is a Mystery, Thriller film directed by Otto Preminger. The narrative presents a compelling narrative that engages viewers from start to finish. This summary provides a scannable look at the movie's central conflict involving Carol Lynley.
Ending Explained: Bunny Lake Is Missing
Ending Breakdown: Directed by Otto Preminger, Bunny Lake Is Missing resolves its central conflict while maintaining thematic consistency. The finale has been praised for its approach to mystery resolution.
The final reveal recontextualizes earlier scenes involving Carol Lynley, offering viewers material for post-viewing discussion.
Ending Analysis:
- Narrative Resolution: The story concludes with clear resolution of its central conflicts, providing closure while maintaining some ambiguity.
- Character Arcs: Main characters complete meaningful transformations, reflecting the film's thematic priorities.
- Thematic Payoff: The ending reinforces the mystery themes established throughout the runtime.
The final moments of Bunny Lake Is Missing reflect the filmmakers' creative choices, offering an ending that aligns with the film's tone and style.
Who Should Watch Bunny Lake Is Missing?
Worth Watching If You:
- Enjoy Mystery films and don't mind familiar tropes
- Are a fan of Carol Lynley or the director
- Want solid genre entertainment
Top Cast: Bunny Lake Is Missing
All Cast & Crew →











Where to Watch Bunny Lake Is Missing Online?
Streaming Hub🎟️ Rent on
Amazon VideoBunny Lake Is Missing Parents Guide & Age Rating
1965 AdvisoryWondering about Bunny Lake Is Missing age rating or if it's safe for kids? Here is our cinematic advisory:
⏱️ Runtime & Duration
The total runtime of Bunny Lake Is Missing is 107 minutes (1h 47m). Ensuring you have enough time for the full cinematic experience.
Verdict Summary
Analyzing the overall audience sentiment, verified rating of 7.2/10, and global performance metrics, Bunny Lake Is Missing is classified as a HIT. It remains an essential part of the 1965 cinematic calendar.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Bunny Lake Is Missing worth watching?
Bunny Lake Is Missing is definitely worth watching if you enjoy Mystery movies. It has a verified rating of 7.2/10 and stands as a HIT in our box office analysis.
Where can I find Bunny Lake Is Missing parents guide and age rating?
The official parents guide for Bunny Lake Is Missing identifies it as NR. Our detailed advisory section above covers all content warnings for families.
What is the total runtime of Bunny Lake Is Missing?
The total duration of Bunny Lake Is Missing is 107 minutes, which is approximately 1h 47m long.
Best Movies to Watch if you liked Bunny Lake Is Missing
How Bunny Lake Is Missing Compares & Where it Ranks
Critic Reviews for Bunny Lake Is Missing
Just out of reach. Bunny Lake is Missing is directed by Otto Preminger and adapted to screenplay by John & Penelope Mortimer from the novel of the same name written by Marryam Modell (AKA: Evelyn Piper). It stars Laurence Olivier, Carol Lynley, Keir Dullea, Martita Hunt & Noel Coward. Music is by Paul Glass and cinematography by Denys N. Coop. 1960s Brit Pop combo The Zombies also feature in the film. Ann Lake (Lynley) turns up at her daughter's school to collect her after her first day there, but nobody has any recollection of ever having seen the four year old... It was a film that irked Otto Preminger, he was never happy with the finished product, this even after changing the ending from the one in the novel and relocating the story from New York to London. Yet time has been very kind to the film, after re-evaluations from auteurist critics the film has found a sturdy fan-base, giving it cult classic status and a reputation as a sleeper classic of its type. You feel that with its thematic links to Hitchcock's Psycho, Preminger wanted to make a film worthy of being in the same league as Hitch's classic. Certainly the marketing for the film lends one to think the makers wanted to be compared with it, that it of course isn't on a par with Psycho is a given, otherwise it would be more well known. But it's a damn fine picture, stitched together impeccably by Preminger, film holds attention and intrigue from Saul Bass' nifty opening credit sequence, right to the eerie denouement. Here we go round the mulberry bush, The mulberry bush, The mulberry bush. Here we go round the mulberry bush on a cold and frosty morning. With real London locations used and Coop's pin sharp black and white (shadowy) photography tight to the unsettling mood, story carries an air of psychological discord about it. The mystery element is strong, and this coupled with the edgy, near unhealthy, relationship between Ann and her brother Stephen (Dullea), makes for a "shifting in your seat" experience. Then there's the small matter of Noel Coward as Horatio Wilson, creepy landlord extraordinaire, he may not be in it for much, but the impression made creeps the flesh. Slotted into the tight narrative are scenes that the likes of Hitchcock, Welles and Kubrick would be proud of, where Preminger calls on his film noir know how to feverishly glide around a doll shop and track his actors as they cavort around a children's garden play area. All topped off by the supreme performance of Olivier as analytical Superintendent Newhouse, a man calm and versed in psychology, he is the perfect contrast to the hysteria and borderline mania that surrounds him. Is it Hitchcockian? As some critics have called it? Well yes it is, but not overtly so, it has closer links in tone and narrative thrust to under seen British thrillers like Don't Talk to Strange Men (1962) and Taste of Fear (1961). Is it flawless? No! Dullea is way too animated, some character reactions to situations are eyebrow-raising and Paul Glass' score is at times maddeningly wrong for the mood sequence it accompanies. But they are problems easily forgivably when taking the film as a whole. 8.5/10
movieMx Verified
This review has been verified for accuracy and editorial quality by our senior cinematic analysts.
This analysis is compiled by our editorial experts using multi-source verification and audience sentiment data for maximum accuracy.










