Is Charlie's Angels Worth Watching?
Answer: Yes, Charlie's Angels is definitely worth watching if you enjoy Action movies.
It features a runtime of 118 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to general audiences.

Verdict:Charlie's Angels is a confirmed FLOP based on our analysis of audience ratings and box office momentum.
With a rating of 6.4/10, it has delivered a mixed experience for fans of the Action, Adventure, Comedy genre.
Answer: Yes, Charlie's Angels is definitely worth watching if you enjoy Action movies.
It features a runtime of 118 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to general audiences.
Last updated: January 10, 2026
Released in 2019, Charlie's Angels enters the Action genre with a narrative focused on Elena Houghlin is a scientist, engineer and inventor of Calisto -- a sustainable energy source that will revolutionize the way people use power. Under the direction of Elizabeth Banks, the film attempts to weave detailed character arcs with visual storytelling.
The film is anchored by performances from Kristen Stewart, Naomi Scott, Ella Balinska. While the cast delivers competent performances, the script occasionally limits their range.
From a technical standpoint, Charlie's Angels offers a competent presentation. The cinematography aligns well with the tone, keeping the narrative moving at a brisk pace.
As of January 2026, Charlie's Angels is available in theaters worldwide. For streaming audiences in the US and UK, look for availability on major platforms roughly 45 days after the theatrical release. Check your local listings for specific showtimes.
With an audience rating of 6.4/10, the reception has been divisive. For fans of Action, Adventure, Comedy, it serves as a worthy addition to the watchlist.
| Metric / Region | Collection (Approx) |
|---|---|
| Production Budget | $48,000,000 |
| Worldwide Gross | $73,279,888 |
| Trade Verdict | FINANCIAL DISAPPOINTMENT |
The estimated production budget for Charlie's Angels is $48,000,000. This figure covers principal photography, talent acquisitions, and visual effects. When accounting for global marketing and distribution, the break-even point is typically 2x the base production cost.










Analyzing the audience sentiment, IMDb rating of 6.4/10, and global collection metrics, Charlie's Angels stands as a challenging project for the creators. It remains an essential piece of the 2019 cinematic year.
Charlie's Angels has received mixed reviews with a 6.4/10 rating, making it a moderate success with the audience.
Charlie's Angels is a mixed bag. It might be worth watching if you're a fan of Action, Adventure, Comedy movies, but read reviews first.
Charlie's Angels is a Action, Adventure, Comedy movie that Elena Houghlin is a scientist, engineer and inventor of Calisto -- a sustainable energy source that will revolutionize the way people use power. It wi...
2019s ‘Charlie’s Angels’ is a fun watch with a great cast, especially a scene-stealing Kristen Stewart (she has a dance number and I need her in a ‘Step Up’ movie ASAP). I really hope this does well, as there is huge potential for sequels exploring all these new Angels. If you like pure joy, I highly recommend checking it out on the big screen. - Chris dos Santos Read Chris' full article... https://www.maketheswitch.com.au/article/review-charlies-angels-a-new-generation-of-angels-another-barrel-of-fun
A pointless reboot for the Woke generation. I wouldn't mind quite so much if the director focused more on a believable storyline than a Twitter-pleasing one instead. Banal to the extreme, a complete waste of time and money: these contemporary iP reboots simply are not working, especially when the political dogma is more or less forced down one's throats for the sake of a good story,
what a junk, is all i can say
I really did want to like it. So many of these girl-power-team-up action films that we've gotten in the past decade feel so hollow. Don't get me wrong, I know there is a huge sect of assholes that were absolutely unwilling to ever give this movie a chance, and had pre-ordained that it would be terrible and they hate it before a single frame was shot, and that almost every single dude in that sect made that decision specifically because of the fact that it's a movie with women in the forefront, and it is good and right to target those dudes with your derision. But having actually watched it... Yeah it's feminism with a teeny splash of gay but like... It's a very **corporate** feminism and a very **under-the-rug-able** gay. Which isn't good, but could have been fine, except that it was the only thing that I was looking forward to, and also seems to be what makes _Charlie's Angels_ think it has done enough. But it's so boardroom driven and paper-thin, which I could hack if the actual plot was any good or any number of other things that you normally look to a movie for, but by and large those aspects aren't just hollow, they're straight-up bad. _Final rating:★★ - Had some things that appeal to me, but a poor finished product._
I have seen worse. I have seen better. Charlie’s Angles was always a part of jiggle tv which made it sadly a labeled brand no matter what direction you approach it from. However I refuse to engage in a pointless debate of judging Elizabeth Banks Girl Power version vs. Mc Q’s non stop pop culture sample a thon. Both seem to me a mirror image of lucridity that belongs to their respective eras. My opinion should be given greater weight on this matter because I found a way to use the word Lucridity.
The fight scenes were pretty bad on some of it. The movie was decent for the comedy but not for the action.