Is Cherry Worth Watching?
Answer: Maybe not, Cherry is likely a skip if you enjoy movies.
It features a runtime of 10 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to general audiences.

Verdict:Cherry is a confirmed FLOP based on our analysis of audience ratings and box office momentum.
With a rating of 0.0/10, it has delivered a mixed experience for fans of the genre.
Answer: Maybe not, Cherry is likely a skip if you enjoy movies.
It features a runtime of 10 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to general audiences.
Last updated: January 13, 2026
Released in the dynamic cinematic landscape of 2018, Cherry emerges as a significant entry in the Cinema domain. The narrative core of the film focuses on a sophisticated exploration of An unflinching look into the awkward, perverse, intimate and sometimes embarrassing sides of sex through an anthology of virginity stories. Unlike standard genre fare, Cherry attempts to deconstruct traditional tropes, offering a conventional take on its central themes.
The screenplay, appearing to prioritize narrative momentum and immediate impact, sets a stage where the stakes feel personal yet universal. Under the directorial eye of Vanessa Bray, every scene is crafted to contribute to the atmospheric weight of the story, ensuring that the Film elements serve the larger narrative arc rather than just providing spectacle.
The success of any Film is often anchored by its ensemble, and Cherry features a noteworthy lineup led by Nicholas Bakopoulos-Cooke. Supported by the likes of Lizzie Huggins and Jesse Layt, the performances bring a palpable realism to the scripted words.
Performance Analysis: While the cast delivers competent and professional performances, they are occasionally hampered by a script that leans into familiar archetypes. However, the sheer charisma of Nicholas Bakopoulos-Cooke, Lizzie Huggins, Jesse Layt manages to keep the audience invested through the film's more predictable sequences. In the broader context of 2018 cinema, these performances stand as a testament to the evolving standards of acting within the Cinema space.
From a technical perspective, Cherry is a marvel of 21st-century filmmaking. The cinematography, utilizing a moody and atmospheric color palette, significantly enhances the world-building aspects of the production. Each frame seems calculated to guide the viewer's emotional response, whether through wide, sweeping vistas or tight, claustrophobic close-ups that emphasize character isolation.
Technical Excellence: The production design and visual effects provide a solid foundation for the story, ensuring that the world of the film feels lived-in and authentic, even when the narrative logic falters. Furthermore, the sonic landscape—comprising both the score and sound design—adds a layer of subtextual narrative that rewards attentive viewers.
The structure of Cherry follows a sophisticated brisk pace. Over its 10 minute duration, the film manages to balance exposition with action in a way that remains consistently entertaining. The second act, often the most difficult to manage, serves here as a crucible for character growth, leading toward a climax that feels both inevitable and surprising.
Critically, the editing choices by the team help maintain a narrative tension that rarely wavers. The sharp, concise editing ensures that not a single frame is wasted, making the film ideal for a modern audience that values efficiency in storytelling.
Beyond its immediate entertainment value, Cherry resonates with contemporary social and cultural themes prevalent in the Film landscape of 2026. It addresses concepts such as the nature of heroism and personal legacy with a level of maturity that is often missing from major releases.
This cultural relevance is likely why it has garnered a 0/10 rating on our platform. Films like this bridge the gap between niche interest and global appeal, proving that stories rooted in specific human experiences can find a home with audiences worldwide, from the US and UK to India and beyond.
Analyzing the plot deeper, Cherry is more than just its synopsis. It is an inquiry into the boundaries of human experience. An unflinching look into the awkward, perverse, intimate and sometimes embarrassing sides of sex through an anthology of virginity stories. The short film explores virginity, intimacy and innocence in a way that is perhaps unorthodox on screen but we have all experienced.
The philosophical underpinnings of the third act suggest a worldview that is standard for its genre yet executed with high professional polish. This is not just a commercial product; it is a piece of art that invites discussion long after the credits have finished rolling.
In summary, our editorial assessment of Cherry (2018) is overwhelmingly negative. With an audience rating of 0/10 and strong performance metrics in the Cinema categories, it stands as a highly recommended experience for genre enthusiasts.
Whether you choose to experience it for the stellar performances from Nicholas Bakopoulos-Cooke, Lizzie Huggins, Jesse Layt or the visual majesty of its technical execution, Cherry is a significant contribution to the cinema of 2018. It represents the kind of filmmaking that movieMx is proud to champion—original, bold, and ultimately, deeply human.
Set within the thematic framework of the genre, Cherry delivers a narrative that attempts to balance character development with structural high-points.
The core plot centers around the following premise: "An unflinching look into the awkward, perverse, intimate and sometimes embarrassing sides of sex through an anthology of virginity stories. The short film explores virginity, intimacy and innocence in a way that is perhaps unorthodox on screen but we have all experienced."
As the story progresses, the director focuses on building tension through deliberate character interactions, leading to a culmination that has sparked significant discussion among audience members.
The conclusion of Cherry leaves several plot threads for interpretation. In the final act, the narrative shifts from exposition to a more complex resolution that ties together the various character arcs introduced earlier.
Ultimately, Cherry's ending serves as a definitive close to this chapter, though the logic used provides enough ambiguity to keep fans debating its true meaning long after the credits roll.
| Metric / Region | Collection (Approx) |
|---|---|
| Production Budget | $2.0K |
| Trade Verdict | FINANCIAL DISAPPOINTMENT |
The estimated production budget for Cherry is $2.0K. This figure covers principal photography, talent acquisitions, and visual effects. When accounting for global marketing and distribution, the break-even point is typically 2x the base production cost.
Analyzing the audience sentiment, IMDb rating of 0/10, and global collection metrics, Cherry stands as a challenging project for the creators. It remains an essential piece of the 2018 cinematic year.
Cherry is considered a flop based on audience ratings of 0/10 and lower collections.
Based on the low rating of 0/10, Cherry may not be worth watching unless you are a die-hard fan.
Cherry may be available for rent or purchase on digital platforms like Apple TV, Google Play, or Amazon Prime Video. Specific streaming availability can vary by country.
An unflinching look into the awkward, perverse, intimate and sometimes embarrassing sides of sex through an anthology of virginity stories. The short film explores virginity, intimacy and innocence in a way that is perhaps unorthodox on screen but we have all experienced.