Chicken (1996) movie backdrop
Chicken (1996) movie poster
⭐ Rating4.5/10
🎯 Verdict AVERAGE
👍 Good
  • Engaging Storyline
  • Strong Performances
👎 Bad
  • Pacing issues in mid
  • Predictable ending
199690 minComedy
Audience VerdictFLOP
Box Office ClassStandard

Chicken

Chicken Movie Hit or Flop?

FLOP

Verdict:Chicken is a confirmed FLOP based on our analysis of audience ratings and box office momentum.

With a rating of 4.5/10, it has delivered a mixed experience for fans of the Comedy genre.

Is Chicken Worth Watching?

Answer: Maybe not, Chicken is likely a skip if you enjoy Comedy movies.

It features a runtime of 90 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to general audiences.

4.52 votes
90Minutes
1996Release Year
Visual Story
Advertisement

Chicken Review

Last updated: January 13, 2026

🎬 Detailed Premise & Narrative Foundations

Released in the dynamic cinematic landscape of 1996, Chicken emerges as a significant entry in the Comedy domain. The narrative core of the film focuses on a sophisticated exploration of On the premise that his albums will sell better if he is dead, an aging pop-singer fakes his own death. Unlike standard genre fare, Chicken attempts to deconstruct traditional tropes, offering a conventional take on its central themes.

The screenplay, appearing to prioritize narrative momentum and immediate impact, sets a stage where the stakes feel personal yet universal. Under the directorial eye of Grant Lahood, every scene is crafted to contribute to the atmospheric weight of the story, ensuring that the Comedy elements serve the larger narrative arc rather than just providing spectacle.

🎭 Cast Performances: A Masterclass in Character Study

The success of any Comedy is often anchored by its ensemble, and Chicken features a noteworthy lineup led by Bryan Marshall. Supported by the likes of Martyn Sanderson and Ellie Smith, the performances bring a palpable realism to the scripted words.

Performance Analysis: While the cast delivers competent and professional performances, they are occasionally hampered by a script that leans into familiar archetypes. However, the sheer charisma of Bryan Marshall, Martyn Sanderson, Ellie Smith manages to keep the audience invested through the film's more predictable sequences. In the broader context of 1996 cinema, these performances stand as a testament to the evolving standards of acting within the Comedy space.

🎥 Directorial Vision & Technical Craftsmanship

From a technical perspective, Chicken is a marvel of 21st-century filmmaking. The cinematography, utilizing a moody and atmospheric color palette, significantly enhances the world-building aspects of the production. Each frame seems calculated to guide the viewer's emotional response, whether through wide, sweeping vistas or tight, claustrophobic close-ups that emphasize character isolation.

Technical Excellence: The production design and visual effects provide a solid foundation for the story, ensuring that the world of the film feels lived-in and authentic, even when the narrative logic falters. Furthermore, the sonic landscape—comprising both the score and sound design—adds a layer of subtextual narrative that rewards attentive viewers.

📜 Narrative Pacing & Structural Integrity

The structure of Chicken follows a sophisticated brisk pace. Over its 90 minute duration, the film manages to balance exposition with action in a way that remains consistently entertaining. The second act, often the most difficult to manage, serves here as a crucible for character growth, leading toward a climax that feels both inevitable and surprising.

Critically, the editing choices by the team help maintain a narrative tension that rarely wavers. The sharp, concise editing ensures that not a single frame is wasted, making the film ideal for a modern audience that values efficiency in storytelling.

🌍 Cultural Impact & Global Resonance

Beyond its immediate entertainment value, Chicken resonates with contemporary social and cultural themes prevalent in the Comedy landscape of 2026. It addresses concepts such as the nature of heroism and personal legacy with a level of maturity that is often missing from major releases.

This cultural relevance is likely why it has garnered a 4.5/10 rating on our platform. Films like this bridge the gap between niche interest and global appeal, proving that stories rooted in specific human experiences can find a home with audiences worldwide, from the US and UK to India and beyond.

📖 Plot Breakdown & Philosophical Subtext

Analyzing the plot deeper, Chicken is more than just its synopsis. It is an inquiry into the boundaries of human experience. On the premise that his albums will sell better if he is dead, an aging pop-singer fakes his own death. True enough, the money rolls in, but no one can get their hands on it because of the seven year waiting period before a missing person can be declared legally dead. However, a crazed animal rights terrorist, who knows he isn't dead, is trying to kill him, because of the singer's advertisements for fried chicken restaurants. Eventually, it turns out that the singer's manager is paying the terrorist to kill him.

The philosophical underpinnings of the third act suggest a worldview that is standard for its genre yet executed with high professional polish. This is not just a commercial product; it is a piece of art that invites discussion long after the credits have finished rolling.

💡 Final Verdict: Is it Worth Watching?

In summary, our editorial assessment of Chicken (1996) is overwhelmingly negative. With an audience rating of 4.5/10 and strong performance metrics in the Comedy categories, it stands as a highly recommended experience for genre enthusiasts.

Whether you choose to experience it for the stellar performances from Bryan Marshall, Martyn Sanderson, Ellie Smith or the visual majesty of its technical execution, Chicken is a significant contribution to the cinema of 1996. It represents the kind of filmmaking that movieMx is proud to champion—original, bold, and ultimately, deeply human.

Chicken Box Office Collection

Metric / RegionCollection (Approx)
Production Budget $2.4M
Trade Verdict FINANCIAL DISAPPOINTMENT

Chicken Budget

The estimated production budget for Chicken is $2.4M. This figure covers principal photography, talent acquisitions, and visual effects. When accounting for global marketing and distribution, the break-even point is typically 2x the base production cost.

Parents Guide & Age Rating

Not Rated
Chicken has not been officially rated yet.

Final Verdict

Analyzing the audience sentiment, IMDb rating of 4.5/10, and global collection metrics, Chicken stands as a challenging project for the creators. It remains an essential piece of the 1996 cinematic year.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Chicken movie hit or flop?

Chicken is considered a flop based on audience ratings of 4.5/10 and lower collections.

Is Chicken worth watching?

Based on the low rating of 4.5/10, Chicken may not be worth watching unless you are a die-hard fan.

Where can I watch Chicken online?

Chicken may be available for rent or purchase on digital platforms like Apple TV, Google Play, or Amazon Prime Video. Specific streaming availability can vary by country.

Explore More Verdicts

Expert Consensus
Live Rating
MOVIEMX
★ 4.5
Chicken
<a href="https://moviemx.in/review/chicken-49144" target="_blank" style="text-decoration:none;"><div style="background:#121212;border:1px solid #f5c518;border-radius:12px;padding:15px;width:180px;text-align:center;font-family:sans-serif;box-shadow:0 10px 20px rgba(0,0,0,0.3);"><div style="color:#f5c518;font-size:10px;font-weight:900;letter-spacing:2px;">MOVIEMX</div><div style="color:white;font-size:28px;font-weight:900;margin:8px 0;">★ 4.5</div><div style="color:#888;font-size:12px;font-weight:500;">Chicken</div></div></a>

Share this rating on your blog or website. Includes a 100% organic backlink.

Synopsis

On the premise that his albums will sell better if he is dead, an aging pop-singer fakes his own death. True enough, the money rolls in, but no one can get their hands on it because of the seven year waiting period before a missing person can be declared legally dead. However, a crazed animal rights terrorist, who knows he isn't dead, is trying to kill him, because of the singer's advertisements for fried chicken restaurants. Eventually, it turns out that the singer's manager is paying the terrorist to kill him.