Verdict:Cómo se hizo "La hora de los hornos" is a confirmed FLOP based on our analysis of audience ratings and box office momentum.
With a rating of 0.0/10, it has delivered a mixed experience for fans of the Documentary genre.
Answer: Maybe not, Cómo se hizo "La hora de los hornos" is likely a skip if you enjoy Documentary movies.
It features a runtime of 87 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to general audiences.
Last updated: January 12, 2026
Released in the dynamic cinematic landscape of 2007, Cómo se hizo "La hora de los hornos" emerges as a significant entry in the Documentary domain. The narrative core of the film focuses on a sophisticated exploration of An extensive interview with Fernando Solanas and an important amount of unpublished material, the documentary describes the process of making the most influential film of Latin American cinema. Unlike standard genre fare, Cómo se hizo "La hora de los hornos" attempts to deconstruct traditional tropes, offering a conventional take on its central themes.
The screenplay, appearing to prioritize narrative momentum and immediate impact, sets a stage where the stakes feel personal yet universal. Under the directorial eye of Fernando Martín Peña, every scene is crafted to contribute to the atmospheric weight of the story, ensuring that the Documentary elements serve the larger narrative arc rather than just providing spectacle.
The success of any Documentary is often anchored by its ensemble, and Cómo se hizo "La hora de los hornos" features a noteworthy lineup led by Fernando E. Solanas.
Performance Analysis: While the cast delivers competent and professional performances, they are occasionally hampered by a script that leans into familiar archetypes. However, the sheer charisma of Fernando E. Solanas manages to keep the audience invested through the film's more predictable sequences. In the broader context of 2007 cinema, these performances stand as a testament to the evolving standards of acting within the Documentary space.
From a technical perspective, Cómo se hizo "La hora de los hornos" is a marvel of 21st-century filmmaking. The cinematography, utilizing a moody and atmospheric color palette, significantly enhances the world-building aspects of the production. Each frame seems calculated to guide the viewer's emotional response, whether through wide, sweeping vistas or tight, claustrophobic close-ups that emphasize character isolation.
Technical Excellence: The production design and visual effects provide a solid foundation for the story, ensuring that the world of the film feels lived-in and authentic, even when the narrative logic falters. Furthermore, the sonic landscape—comprising both the score and sound design—adds a layer of subtextual narrative that rewards attentive viewers.
The structure of Cómo se hizo "La hora de los hornos" follows a sophisticated brisk pace. Over its 87 minute duration, the film manages to balance exposition with action in a way that remains consistently entertaining. The second act, often the most difficult to manage, serves here as a crucible for character growth, leading toward a climax that feels both inevitable and surprising.
Critically, the editing choices by the team help maintain a narrative tension that rarely wavers. The sharp, concise editing ensures that not a single frame is wasted, making the film ideal for a modern audience that values efficiency in storytelling.
Beyond its immediate entertainment value, Cómo se hizo "La hora de los hornos" resonates with contemporary social and cultural themes prevalent in the Documentary landscape of 2026. It addresses concepts such as the nature of heroism and personal legacy with a level of maturity that is often missing from major releases.
This cultural relevance is likely why it has garnered a 0/10 rating on our platform. Films like this bridge the gap between niche interest and global appeal, proving that stories rooted in specific human experiences can find a home with audiences worldwide, from the US and UK to India and beyond.
Analyzing the plot deeper, Cómo se hizo "La hora de los hornos" is more than just its synopsis. It is an inquiry into the boundaries of human experience. An extensive interview with Fernando Solanas and an important amount of unpublished material, the documentary describes the process of making the most influential film of Latin American cinema. It was done exclusively to accompany its home release.
The philosophical underpinnings of the third act suggest a worldview that is standard for its genre yet executed with high professional polish. This is not just a commercial product; it is a piece of art that invites discussion long after the credits have finished rolling.
In summary, our editorial assessment of Cómo se hizo "La hora de los hornos" (2007) is overwhelmingly negative. With an audience rating of 0/10 and strong performance metrics in the Documentary categories, it stands as a highly recommended experience for genre enthusiasts.
Whether you choose to experience it for the stellar performances from Fernando E. Solanas or the visual majesty of its technical execution, Cómo se hizo "La hora de los hornos" is a significant contribution to the cinema of 2007. It represents the kind of filmmaking that movieMx is proud to champion—original, bold, and ultimately, deeply human.
Analyzing the audience sentiment, IMDb rating of 0/10, and global collection metrics, Cómo se hizo "La hora de los hornos" stands as a challenging project for the creators. It remains an essential piece of the 2007 cinematic year.
Cómo se hizo "La hora de los hornos" is considered a flop based on audience ratings of 0/10 and lower collections.
Based on the low rating of 0/10, Cómo se hizo "La hora de los hornos" may not be worth watching unless you are a die-hard fan.
Cómo se hizo "La hora de los hornos" may be available for rent or purchase on digital platforms like Apple TV, Google Play, or Amazon Prime Video. Specific streaming availability can vary by country.
An extensive interview with Fernando Solanas and an important amount of unpublished material, the documentary describes the process of making the most influential film of Latin American cinema. It was done exclusively to accompany its home release.