Daredevil
Performance & Direction: Daredevil Review
Last updated: February 17, 2026
Quick Verdict: Hit or Flop?
Is Daredevil (2003) worth watching? According to our cinematic analysis, the film stands as a AVERAGE with a verified audience rating of 5.3/10. Whether you're looking for the box office collection, ending explained, or parents guide, our review covers everything you need to know about this Fantasy.
Cast Performances: A Masterclass
The success of any Fantasy is often anchored by its ensemble, and Daredevil features a noteworthy lineup led by Ben Affleck . Supported by the likes of Jennifer Garner and Colin Farrell , the performances bring a palpable realism to the scripted words.
Performance Analysis: While the cast delivers competent and professional performances, they are occasionally hampered by a script that leans into familiar archetypes.
Final Verdict: Is it Worth Watching?
Story & Plot Summary: Daredevil
Quick Plot Summary: Released in 2003, Daredevil is a Fantasy, Action film directed by Mark Steven Johnson. The narrative transports viewers to imaginative worlds filled with magic, wonder, and epic adventures. This summary provides a scannable look at the movie's central conflict involving Ben Affleck.
Story Breakdown
The title presents its narrative with careful attention to pacing and character development. A man blinded in a childhood accident fights crime using his superhumanly-elevated remaining senses. The story unfolds naturally, allowing viewers to become invested in the outcome while maintaining engagement throughout.
Narrative Structure
- Opening Hook: The title establishes its world and central conflict efficiently in the opening act.
- Character Arc: Character development is present but somewhat formulaic, following familiar patterns without adding fresh perspectives to the genre.
- Climax & Resolution: The climax brings together the narrative threads, providing resolution while staying true to the established tone.
Thematic Depth
The film operates on multiple levels, using its genre framework to explore deeper themes about human nature, society, and the choices that define us.
What Works & What Doesn't
✅ Strengths
- Attempts to bring fresh ideas to the genre
- Some memorable individual scenes or performances
⚠️ Weaknesses
- Pacing issues that affect narrative flow
- Underdeveloped characters or predictable plot points
- Reliance on genre clichés without adding fresh perspective
Ending Explained: Daredevil
Ending Breakdown: Directed by Mark Steven Johnson, Daredevil attempts to tie together its various plot elements. The finale presents its approach to fantasy resolution.
The climactic sequence delivers on the escalating tension involving Ben Affleck, offering viewers material for post-viewing discussion.
Ending Analysis:
- Narrative Resolution: The story concludes by addressing its primary narrative threads, providing closure while maintaining some ambiguity.
- Character Arcs: Character journeys reach their narrative endpoints, reflecting the film's thematic priorities.
- Thematic Payoff: The ending reinforces the fantasy themes established throughout the runtime.
The final moments of Daredevil reflect the filmmakers' creative choices, offering an ending that aligns with the film's tone and style.
Who Should Watch Daredevil?
Consider Watching If:
- You're a completist for Fantasy films
- You're curious despite mixed reviews
- You have low expectations and want casual entertainment
Box Office Collection: Daredevil
| Metric / Region | Collection (Approx) |
|---|---|
| Production Budget | $78.0M |
| Worldwide Gross | $179.2M |
| Trade Verdict | FINANCIAL DISAPPOINTMENT |
Daredevil Budget
The estimated production budget for Daredevil is $78.0M. This figure covers principal photography, talent acquisitions, and visual effects. When accounting for global marketing and distribution, the break-even point is typically 2x the base production cost.
Top Cast: Daredevil
All Cast & Crew →











Where to Watch Daredevil Online?
Streaming Hub📺 Stream on
JioHotstar
VI movies and tv🏷️ Buy on
Google Play Movies
YouTubeDaredevil Parents Guide & Age Rating
2003 AdvisoryWondering about Daredevil age rating or if it's safe for kids? Here is our cinematic advisory:
⏱️ Runtime & Duration
The total runtime of Daredevil is 103 minutes (1h 43m). Ensuring you have enough time for the full cinematic experience.
Verdict Summary
Analyzing the overall audience sentiment, verified rating of 5.3/10, and global performance metrics, Daredevil is classified as a AVERAGE. It remains an essential part of the 2003 cinematic calendar.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Daredevil worth watching?
Daredevil is definitely worth watching if you enjoy Fantasy movies. It has a verified rating of 5.3/10 and stands as a AVERAGE in our box office analysis.
Where can I find Daredevil parents guide and age rating?
The official parents guide for Daredevil identifies it as PG-13. Our detailed advisory section above covers all content warnings for families.
What is the total runtime of Daredevil?
The total duration of Daredevil is 103 minutes, which is approximately 1h 43m long.
Best Movies to Watch if you liked Daredevil
How Daredevil Compares & Where it Ranks
Critic Reviews for Daredevil
Waste of film stock
It's not just that Daredevil is a poorly made movie. It's that it takes a great character and turns him into a mishmash of tired clichés, shamelessly copying The Crow, Spider-Man, The Matrix, as well as both Burton and Schumacher's Batman in an attempt to appeal to the teen angst crowd. Don't blame Ben Affleck. He does what he can but the script and terrible production design lets him down as much as it us.
**Daredevil is cheesy but trying to be serious while dripping in 2000s grunge. It isn’t a masterpiece, but it was a solid superhero film for its time.** Daredevil (2003) falls prey to a lot of judgment from people who have spent over a decade with Marvel films and The Dark Knight trilogy, but rewind to a time when Blade, X-Men, and Tobey Macguire’s Spider-man were all you had for superhero films, and you might start to see Daredevil for what it was. It was a genuine product of its time - Seether and Evanescence heavily featured on the soundtrack, leather superhero suits, and ridiculous dialogue. Everything was so cheesy in superhero movies at the time - don’t forget that Catwoman came out just a year later. Daredevil tried to be more edgy and gritty than Spider-man at a time when most people still considered superhero movies as kids’ films. It had a lot going against it but still brought together a fantastic cast with Ben Affleck and Colin Farrell at a very popular time in their careers and Jennifer Garner while she was one of the biggest stars on TV. This movie even managed to spawn a spin-off film! Say what you want, but when I saw this movie in 7th grade, I thought Daredevil was one of the coolest superheroes I had ever seen, and even though years later I can see the movie more for what it is - it still holds a special place in my heart.
This film feels longer than just 100 minutes! Ben Affleck ("Matt Murdock") is the eponymous super-hero who is blinded by an accident with some toxic waste but as a result, has acute hearing and sensitivity to movement. He spends his days as a lawyer, his nights à-la "Spiderman" as a bit of a vigilante trying keep the streets of New York's infamous "Hell's Kitchen" clear of criminals. Lately, his sights have become firmly set on the "Kingpin" (Colin Farrell) - the biggest baddie of them all, but a man whom the courts cannot incarcerate. His masked mission now becomes to bring this man to justice. This is a quickly paced, and colourful extravaganza - plenty of action, the visual effects are good and a premiss just a little different. The dialogue is pretty banal, Farrell is dreadful - a ham if I ever I saw one, and the action scenes are just a little bit too repetitive and dull after a while. Affleck brings little charisma to the screen and the romance with Jennifer Garner ("Electric Nachos" - or something similar) was gloopy and dragged the pace down all too often before an ending that, well - is just daft. It's harmless fun but I don't think I would bother watching it again.
While the style and direction are very early 2000s in the superhero genre, I still found this relatively entertaining though seeing this again after many years, don't think Affleck was great in the role, though I did like Jennifer Garner's Elektra. As a side note, I did watch the director's cut. **3.25/5**
movieMx Verified
This review has been verified for accuracy and editorial quality by our senior cinematic analysts.
This analysis is compiled by our editorial experts using multi-source verification and audience sentiment data for maximum accuracy.









