Is Devil in the Flesh Worth Watching?
Answer: Maybe not, Devil in the Flesh is likely a skip if you enjoy Drama movies.
It features a runtime of 83 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to general audiences.

Verdict:Devil in the Flesh is a confirmed FLOP based on our analysis of audience ratings and box office momentum.
With a rating of 1.0/10, it has delivered a mixed experience for fans of the Drama, Documentary genre.
Answer: Maybe not, Devil in the Flesh is likely a skip if you enjoy Drama movies.
It features a runtime of 83 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to general audiences.
Last updated: January 12, 2026
Released in the dynamic cinematic landscape of 1964, Devil in the Flesh emerges as a significant entry in the Drama, Documentary domain. The narrative core of the film focuses on a sophisticated exploration of A group of physicians sets out on an international expedition to study the causes and spread of sexually transmitted diseases. Unlike standard genre fare, Devil in the Flesh attempts to deconstruct traditional tropes, offering a conventional take on its central themes.
The screenplay, appearing to prioritize narrative momentum and immediate impact, sets a stage where the stakes feel personal yet universal. Under the directorial eye of Hermann Wallbrück, every scene is crafted to contribute to the atmospheric weight of the story, ensuring that the Drama elements serve the larger narrative arc rather than just providing spectacle.
The success of any Drama is often anchored by its ensemble, and Devil in the Flesh features a noteworthy lineup led by Aleksandar Gavrić. Supported by the likes of Ruth Gassmann and Peter Heim, the performances bring a palpable realism to the scripted words.
Performance Analysis: While the cast delivers competent and professional performances, they are occasionally hampered by a script that leans into familiar archetypes. However, the sheer charisma of Aleksandar Gavrić, Ruth Gassmann, Peter Heim manages to keep the audience invested through the film's more predictable sequences. In the broader context of 1964 cinema, these performances stand as a testament to the evolving standards of acting within the Drama, Documentary space.
From a technical perspective, Devil in the Flesh is a marvel of 21st-century filmmaking. The cinematography, utilizing a moody and atmospheric color palette, significantly enhances the world-building aspects of the production. Each frame seems calculated to guide the viewer's emotional response, whether through wide, sweeping vistas or tight, claustrophobic close-ups that emphasize character isolation.
Technical Excellence: The production design and visual effects provide a solid foundation for the story, ensuring that the world of the film feels lived-in and authentic, even when the narrative logic falters. Furthermore, the sonic landscape—comprising both the score and sound design—adds a layer of subtextual narrative that rewards attentive viewers.
The structure of Devil in the Flesh follows a sophisticated brisk pace. Over its 83 minute duration, the film manages to balance exposition with action in a way that remains consistently entertaining. The second act, often the most difficult to manage, serves here as a crucible for character growth, leading toward a climax that feels both inevitable and surprising.
Critically, the editing choices by the team help maintain a narrative tension that rarely wavers. The sharp, concise editing ensures that not a single frame is wasted, making the film ideal for a modern audience that values efficiency in storytelling.
Beyond its immediate entertainment value, Devil in the Flesh resonates with contemporary social and cultural themes prevalent in the Drama landscape of 2026. It addresses concepts such as the nature of heroism and personal legacy with a level of maturity that is often missing from major releases.
This cultural relevance is likely why it has garnered a 1/10 rating on our platform. Films like this bridge the gap between niche interest and global appeal, proving that stories rooted in specific human experiences can find a home with audiences worldwide, from the US and UK to India and beyond.
Analyzing the plot deeper, Devil in the Flesh is more than just its synopsis. It is an inquiry into the complexity of relationships. A group of physicians sets out on an international expedition to study the causes and spread of sexually transmitted diseases. Through encounters across Europe and Africa, the film examines how modern lifestyles, social change, and human behavior intersect with public health. Presented as a semi-documentary drama, it delivers a stark warning about a global medical and moral challenge.
The philosophical underpinnings of the third act suggest a worldview that is standard for its genre yet executed with high professional polish. This is not just a commercial product; it is a piece of art that invites discussion long after the credits have finished rolling.
In summary, our editorial assessment of Devil in the Flesh (1964) is overwhelmingly negative. With an audience rating of 1/10 and strong performance metrics in the Drama, Documentary categories, it stands as a highly recommended experience for genre enthusiasts.
Whether you choose to experience it for the stellar performances from Aleksandar Gavrić, Ruth Gassmann, Peter Heim or the visual majesty of its technical execution, Devil in the Flesh is a significant contribution to the cinema of 1964. It represents the kind of filmmaking that movieMx is proud to champion—original, bold, and ultimately, deeply human.
Amazon Video
Amazon VideoAnalyzing the audience sentiment, IMDb rating of 1/10, and global collection metrics, Devil in the Flesh stands as a challenging project for the creators. It remains an essential piece of the 1964 cinematic year.
Devil in the Flesh is considered a flop based on audience ratings of 1/10 and lower collections.
Based on the low rating of 1/10, Devil in the Flesh may not be worth watching unless you are a die-hard fan.
Devil in the Flesh may be available for rent or purchase on digital platforms like Apple TV, Google Play, or Amazon Prime Video. Specific streaming availability can vary by country.
A group of physicians sets out on an international expedition to study the causes and spread of sexually transmitted diseases. Through encounters across Europe and Africa, the film examines how modern lifestyles, social change, and human behavior intersect with public health. Presented as a semi-documentary drama, it delivers a stark warning about a global medical and moral challenge.