Dracula A.D. 1972 backdrop - movieMx Review
Dracula A.D. 1972 movie poster - Dracula A.D. 1972 review and rating on movieMx
197296 minHorror

Dracula A.D. 1972

Is Dracula A.D. 1972 a Hit or Flop?

FLOP

Is Dracula A.D. 1972 worth watching? With a rating of 5.9/10, this Horror film is a mixed-bag for fans of the genre. Read on for our detailed analysis and user reviews.

5.9182 votes
RateYour rating
Advertisement

Dracula A.D. 1972 Synopsis

Set in London in the early 1970's, supposedly for teen thrills, Johnny organises a black magic ceremony in a desolate churchyard. The culmination of the ritual, however, is the rejuvenation of Dracula from shrivelled remains. Johnny, Dracula' s disciple, lures victims to the deserted graveyard for his master's pleasure and one of the victims delivered is Jessica Van Helsing. Descended from the Van Helsing line of vampire hunters her grandfather, equipped with all the devices to snare and destroy the Count, confronts his arch enemy in the age-old battle between good and evil.

Advertisement

Top Cast

Christopher Lee
Christopher LeeCount Dracula
Peter Cushing
Peter CushingProfessor Van Helsing
Stephanie Beacham
Stephanie BeachamJessica Van Helsing
Christopher Neame
Christopher NeameJohnny Alucard
Michael Coles
Michael ColesInspector
Marsha Hunt
Marsha HuntGaynor
Caroline Munro
Caroline MunroLaura Bellows
Janet Key
Janet KeyAnna
William Ellis
William EllisJoe Mitcham
Pip Miller
Pip MillerBob

Official Trailer

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Dracula A.D. 1972 worth watching?

Dracula A.D. 1972 has received mixed reviews with a 5.9/10 rating. It might be worth watching if you're a fan of Horror movies.

Is Dracula A.D. 1972 hit or flop?

Dracula A.D. 1972 has received average ratings (5.9/10), performing moderately with audiences.

What genre is Dracula A.D. 1972?

Dracula A.D. 1972 is a Horror movie that Set in London in the early 1970's, supposedly for teen thrills, Johnny organises a black magic ceremony in a desolate churchyard. The culmination of t...

You Might Also Like

Explore More

Critic Reviews

talisencrwSep 28, 2016
★ 8

Yes, I know I'm giving this WAY TOO MANY marks, but, hey, I love all of the clashes between Sir Christopher Lee's 'Count Dracula' and Sir Peter Cushing's 'Van Helsing' (perhaps the greatest characterizations of those two characters, over a series of films, in cinema), and the then-contemporary (now almost 45 years ago!) update certainly is intriguing. So sue me.

John ChardSep 3, 2017
★ 4

A misjudged mess. Good grief! Hammer Horror Films were very much in a flux come 1972, so in a bold (yet ultimately ill conceived) attempt to move with the times and grasp a new audience, they turned to old faithful to resurrect their hopes - Count Dracula. Pic starts with an exciting prologue in 1872, where we see Dracula (Christopher Lee) and Van Helsing (Peter Cushing) battling to the death. We witness Drac's ashes buried near to the grave of Helsing, and then it's fast forward to 1972... It must have seemed like a good idea at the time - letting loose one of the most iconic monsters in movie history in contemporary London - but it never works, lacking horror vibrancy and very much coming off as a pastiche of former glory. A rather excellent resurrection section of film aside, pic is just too quirky and kitsch for its own good, more laughable than anything remotely scary. Other major problems hurt the possibility of enjoying it on some sort of parodic level. Dracula never actually does much, confined to a small location (again!), so not really tearing up contemporary London as it happens, while the 1972 "youths" who form the core of the narrative are actually out of date themselves! Something further compounded by the quite dreadful musical score, which should have been confined in a locked safe a decade earlier. Some of the more notable Hammer touches try to battle there way through the murk, but it's a losing battle, the company's visual identity lost amongst a daft script and cartoonish direction. It has fans, and viewing it now some decades later one can at least embrace it with a modicum of endearment, but it's a poor pic and signals the start of a sad era for a great production company. 4/10