Is Floods of Fear Worth Watching?
Answer: Yes, Floods of Fear is definitely worth watching if you enjoy Adventure movies.
It features a runtime of 84 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to general audiences.

Verdict:Floods of Fear is a confirmed HIT based on our analysis of audience ratings and box office momentum.
With a rating of 6.7/10, it has delivered a mixed experience for fans of the Adventure, Action, Thriller genre.
Answer: Yes, Floods of Fear is definitely worth watching if you enjoy Adventure movies.
It features a runtime of 84 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to general audiences.
Last updated: January 11, 2026
Released in 1958, Floods of Fear enters the Adventure genre with a narrative focused on A man framed for murder escapes from prison during a flood and helps a young woman in distress. Under the direction of Charles Crichton, the film attempts to weave detailed character arcs with visual storytelling.
The film is anchored by performances from Howard Keel, Anne Heywood, Cyril Cusack. While the cast delivers competent performances, the script occasionally limits their range.
From a technical standpoint, Floods of Fear offers a competent presentation. The cinematography uses a distinct visual palette that aligns well with the tone. The sharp editing keeps the narrative moving at a brisk pace, maximizing the impact of the key sequences.
Beyond the narrative, Floods of Fear resonates with current cultural themes in the Adventure space. It stays within the established boundaries of its genre, providing exactly what core fans expect without reinventing the wheel.
As of January 2026, Floods of Fear is available in theaters worldwide. For streaming audiences in the US, UK, and India, look for availability on major platforms roughly 45-60 days after the theatrical release. Don't miss the high-definition experience provided by premium large format (PLF) screenings.
The plot of Floods of Fear centers on a unique premise within the Adventure landscape. A man framed for murder escapes from prison during a flood and helps a young woman in distress. The second act serves as a major turning point, leading to a climax that fans of 1958 cinema will find fairly predictable.
The ending of Floods of Fear has sparked significant debate on social media. It signifies the ambiguous resolution of the main plot thread. Given the current box office momentum, discussions of a Floods of Fear sequel or a wider cinematic universe are already gaining traction.
Final verdict for Floods of Fear (1958): with an audience rating of 6.7/10, the reception has been generally positive. It is a must-watch for fans of Adventure, Action, Thriller cinema who appreciate attention to detail.
Analyzing the audience sentiment, IMDb rating of 6.7/10, and global collection metrics, Floods of Fear stands as a successful venture for the creators. It remains an essential piece of the 1958 cinematic year.
Floods of Fear has received mixed reviews with a 6.7/10 rating, making it a moderate success with the audience.
Floods of Fear is a mixed bag. It might be worth watching if you're a fan of Adventure, Action, Thriller movies, but read reviews first.
Floods of Fear is a Adventure, Action, Thriller movie that A man framed for murder escapes from prison during a flood and helps a young woman in distress....


Floods of Fear has received mixed reviews with a 6.7/10 rating, making it a moderate success with the audience.
Floods of Fear is a mixed bag. It might be worth watching if you're a fan of Adventure, Action, Thriller movies, but read reviews first.
Floods of Fear is a Adventure, Action, Thriller movie that A man framed for murder escapes from prison during a flood and helps a young woman in distress....
Floods of Fear may not be suitable for all family members as it contains Adventure, Action, Thriller elements. Parental guidance is recommended.
You can find streaming options and availability for Floods of Fear on popular platforms. Check movieMx for the latest updates and reviews.
Floods of Fear features a talented cast. Check our "Top Cast" section to see the full list of actors and the characters they play in this film.
The runtime and duration of Floods of Fear are available in the movie details section. It's a gripping story that keeps you engaged from start to finish.
The Waterworld Redemption. Floods of Fear is directed by Charles Crichton who also co-adapts the screenplay with Vivienne Knight from the novel written by John and Ward Hawkins. It stars Howard Keel, Anne Heywood, Cyril Cusack, Harry H. Corbett, John Crawford and Eddie Byrne. Music is by Alan Rawsthorne and cinematography by Christopher Challis. Two convicts and one guard are washed away into a flood after the barrier they were building collapses. Ending up at the flooded farmhouse of Dr. Matthews (John Phillips), the men find that the doctor is not at home but his daughter Elizabeth (Heywood) is. Soon enough tensions rise to boiling point, especially since one of the cons, Donovan (Keel), appears to be innocent of the murder he is locked up for, and he has revenge on his mind... Something of a legend for his directing work for Ealing Studios, Charles Crichton does a fine job blending a suspenseful action thriller with film noir thematics. Though primarily known for comedies (his last film would be A Fish Called Wanda), Crichton had already shown he had a considerable eye for noir with the brilliant and under seen Dirk Bogarde starrer Hunted (1952), only difference here is that the setting is predominantly set on or near water, and it really works for dramatic purpose. The flood recreation scenes are excellent, be it our protagonists/antagonists flailing about in the water trying to keep alive, or the destruction sequences as houses and various other parts of the watery landscape falling by the wayside, there is high peril crafted out there on those waters. With Challis' (Footsteps in the Fog and latterly Arabesque) beautiful black and white photography making a mark, and Rawsthorne's (Uncle Silas/Pandora and the Flying Dutchman) musical score suitably stirring, the tech credits are high grade for such a Brit production. It's the character dynamics that really seal the deal to make this a film well worth seeking out. Keel is full on brooding machismo, who seems to have the world on his shoulders, but he always convinces as a man to turn to in a crisis. Cusack is a nutter, no beating around the bush, he would stab you as soon as look at you, and he has very unhealthy designs Elizabeth. Which brings us to Heywood, who as the sole female of the piece gives a real stoic performance, she's constantly pulled from pillar to post, drowned like a rat, and she has to balance fear, bravado and romance, which she does admirably. While Corbett, who would find fame in the hugely popular TV comedy show Steptoe & Son, provides the requisite officialdom axis in the play. All good really. 7.5/10
The Waterworld Redemption. Floods of Fear is directed by Charles Crichton who also co-adapts the screenplay with Vivienne Knight from the novel written by John and Ward Hawkins. It stars Howard Keel, Anne Heywood, Cyril Cusack, Harry H. Corbett, John Crawford and Eddie Byrne. Music is by Alan Rawsthorne and cinematography by Christopher Challis. Two convicts and one guard are washed away into a flood after the barrier they were building collapses. Ending up at the flooded farmhouse of Dr. Matthews (John Phillips), the men find that the doctor is not at home but his daughter Elizabeth (Heywood) is. Soon enough tensions rise to boiling point, especially since one of the cons, Donovan (Keel), appears to be innocent of the murder he is locked up for, and he has revenge on his mind... Something of a legend for his directing work for Ealing Studios, Charles Crichton does a fine job blending a suspenseful action thriller with film noir thematics. Though primarily known for comedies (his last film would be A Fish Called Wanda), Crichton had already shown he had a considerable eye for noir with the brilliant and under seen Dirk Bogarde starrer Hunted (1952), only difference here is that the setting is predominantly set on or near water, and it really works for dramatic purpose. The flood recreation scenes are excellent, be it our protagonists/antagonists flailing about in the water trying to keep alive, or the destruction sequences as houses and various other parts of the watery landscape falling by the wayside, there is high peril crafted out there on those waters. With Challis' (Footsteps in the Fog and latterly Arabesque) beautiful black and white photography making a mark, and Rawsthorne's (Uncle Silas/Pandora and the Flying Dutchman) musical score suitably stirring, the tech credits are high grade for such a Brit production. It's the character dynamics that really seal the deal to make this a film well worth seeking out. Keel is full on brooding machismo, who seems to have the world on his shoulders, but he always convinces as a man to turn to in a crisis. Cusack is a nutter, no beating around the bush, he would stab you as soon as look at you, and he has very unhealthy designs on Elizabeth. Which brings us to Heywood, who as the sole female of the piece gives a real stoic performance, she's constantly pulled from pillar to post, drowned like a rat, and she has to balance fear, bravado and romance, which she does admirably. While Corbett, who would find fame in the hugely popular TV comedy show Steptoe & Son, provides the requisite officialdom axis in the play. All good really. 7.5/10