Performance & Direction: Gold Review
Last updated: February 15, 2026
Quick Verdict: Hit or Flop?
Is Gold (2013) worth watching? According to our cinematic analysis, the film stands as a ABOVE AVERAGE with a verified audience rating of 5.8/10. Whether you're looking for the box office collection, ending explained, or parents guide, our review covers everything you need to know about this Adventure.
Cast Performances: A Masterclass
The success of any Adventure is often anchored by its ensemble, and Gold features a noteworthy lineup led by Nina Hoss . Supported by the likes of Lars Rudolph and Uwe Bohm , the performances bring a palpable realism to the scripted words.
Performance Analysis: While the cast delivers competent and professional performances, they are occasionally hampered by a script that leans into familiar archetypes.
Final Verdict: Is it Worth Watching?
Story & Plot Summary: Gold
Quick Plot Summary: Released in 2013, Gold is a Adventure, Drama, Western film directed by Thomas Arslan. The narrative presents a compelling narrative that engages viewers from start to finish. This summary provides a scannable look at the movie's central conflict involving Nina Hoss.
Ending Explained: Gold
Ending Breakdown: Directed by Thomas Arslan, Gold attempts to tie together its various plot elements. The finale presents its approach to adventure resolution.
The emotional climax centers on character transformation involving Nina Hoss, offering viewers material for post-viewing discussion.
Ending Analysis:
- Narrative Resolution: The story concludes by addressing its primary narrative threads, providing closure while maintaining some ambiguity.
- Character Arcs: Character journeys reach their narrative endpoints, reflecting the film's thematic priorities.
- Thematic Payoff: The ending reinforces the adventure themes established throughout the runtime.
The final moments of Gold reflect the filmmakers' creative choices, offering an ending that aligns with the film's tone and style.
Who Should Watch Gold?
Consider Watching If:
- You're a completist for Adventure films
- You're curious despite mixed reviews
- You have low expectations and want casual entertainment
Top Cast: Gold
All Cast & Crew →






Where to Watch Gold Online?
Streaming Hub🎟️ Rent on
Amazon Video
Apple TV Store
Google Play Movies
YouTube🏷️ Buy on
Amazon Video
Apple TV Store
Google Play Movies
YouTubeGold Parents Guide & Age Rating
2013 AdvisoryWondering about Gold age rating or if it's safe for kids? Here is our cinematic advisory:
⏱️ Runtime & Duration
The total runtime of Gold is 112 minutes (1h 52m). Ensuring you have enough time for the full cinematic experience.
Verdict Summary
Analyzing the overall audience sentiment, verified rating of 5.8/10, and global performance metrics, Gold is classified as a ABOVE AVERAGE. It remains an essential part of the 2013 cinematic calendar.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Gold worth watching?
Gold is definitely worth watching if you enjoy Adventure movies. It has a verified rating of 5.8/10 and stands as a ABOVE AVERAGE in our box office analysis.
Where can I find Gold parents guide and age rating?
The official parents guide for Gold identifies it as Not Rated. Our detailed advisory section above covers all content warnings for families.
What is the total runtime of Gold?
The total duration of Gold is 112 minutes, which is approximately 1h 52m long.
Best Movies to Watch if you liked Gold
How Gold Compares & Where it Ranks
Critic Reviews for Gold
Gritty hardships of traveling in the Far North during the Klondike Gold Rush RELEASED IN 2013 and written & directed by Thomas Arslan, "Gold” covers events in 1898 when a single woman (Nina Hoss) joins a small group of other prospectors heading north through Canada to the Klondike gold fields near Dawson City. Their numbers dwindle as they face challenging hardships. My title blurb says it all. Just as “Meek’s Cutoff” (2010) covered the adversities of traveling in the late 1800s on an alternative route of the Oregon Trail and “The Homesman” (2014) covered journeying from western Nebraska to Iowa, so “Gold” features the challenges of traveling from Ashcroft, BC, where the train tracks end, to Dawson City in the Yukon territories. Needless to say, “Gold” favors gritty realism to conventional Western staples. Still, there are Indians, Old West boom towns, covered wagons, a possible hanging, alcohol and a believable shootout. I think it’s a little more compelling than those other two flicks, although those are worthwhile too if you favor mundane accounts of arduous travel in the Old West. If you’d like to see a more eventful old-fashioned Western covering similar terrain, check out “The Far Country” (1954) with Jimmy Stewart. I suppose the movie should've contained at least one rain sequence, particularly considering it takes place in the Great Northwest. But shooting in the rain is challenging & costly so the viewer is asked to read in-between-the-lines that they experienced rainy days. The film never shows any of the characters 'going to the bathroom' either, but we're to assume it happened. A German/Canadian production, THE MOVIE RUNS 1 hour 41 minutes and was shot in British Columbia, Canada. At least half the dialogue is in German with English subtitles. GRADE: B
movieMx Verified
This review has been verified for accuracy and editorial quality by our senior cinematic analysts.
This analysis is compiled by our editorial experts using multi-source verification and audience sentiment data for maximum accuracy.









