Is Golden Years Worth Watching?
Answer: Yes, Golden Years is definitely worth watching if you enjoy Crime movies.
It features a runtime of 96 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to mature audiences.

Verdict:Golden Years is a confirmed FLOP based on our analysis of audience ratings and box office momentum.
With a rating of 6.3/10, it has delivered a mixed experience for fans of the Crime, Comedy genre.
Answer: Yes, Golden Years is definitely worth watching if you enjoy Crime movies.
It features a runtime of 96 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to mature audiences.
Last updated: January 11, 2026
Released in 2016, Golden Years enters the Crime genre with a narrative focused on Fate, the pensions crisis and a steadfast refusal to accept the injustice of old age have contrived to force law abiding, retired couple, Arthur and Martha Goode into a life of crime. Under the direction of John Miller, the film attempts to weave detailed character arcs with visual storytelling.
The film is anchored by performances from Bernard Hill. While the cast delivers competent performances, the script occasionally limits their range.
From a technical standpoint, Golden Years offers a competent presentation. The cinematography uses a distinct visual palette that aligns well with the tone. The sharp editing keeps the narrative moving at a brisk pace, maximizing the impact of the key sequences.
Beyond the narrative, Golden Years resonates with current cultural themes in the Crime space. It stays within the established boundaries of its genre, providing exactly what core fans expect without reinventing the wheel.
As of early 2026, Golden Years is available for streaming on Amazon Prime Video. It is also featured on platforms like Amazon Prime Video with Ads. For audiences in the US, UK, and India, digital rentals are typically available on platforms like Amazon Video roughly 45-60 days after the theatrical release.
The plot of Golden Years centers on a unique premise within the Crime landscape. Fate, the pensions crisis and a steadfast refusal to accept the injustice of old age have contrived to force law abiding, retired couple, Arthur and Martha Goode into a life of crime. The second act serves as a major turning point, leading to a climax that fans of 2016 cinema will find fairly predictable.
The ending of Golden Years has sparked significant debate on social media. It signifies the ambiguous resolution of the main plot thread. Given the current box office momentum, discussions of a Golden Years sequel or a wider cinematic universe are already gaining traction.
Final verdict for Golden Years (2016): with an audience rating of 6.3/10, the reception has been divisive. It is a recommended for fans of Crime, Comedy cinema who appreciate attention to detail.
Amazon Prime Video
Amazon Prime Video with Ads
Amazon Video
Amazon VideoAnalyzing the audience sentiment, IMDb rating of 6.3/10, and global collection metrics, Golden Years stands as a challenging project for the creators. It remains an essential piece of the 2016 cinematic year.
Golden Years has received mixed reviews with a 6.3/10 rating, making it a moderate success with the audience.
Golden Years is a mixed bag. It might be worth watching if you're a fan of Crime, Comedy movies, but read reviews first.
Golden Years is currently available for streaming on Amazon Prime Video. You can also check for it on platforms like Amazon Prime Video, Amazon Prime Video with Ads depending on your region.
Golden Years has received mixed reviews with a 6.3/10 rating, making it a moderate success with the audience.
Golden Years is a mixed bag. It might be worth watching if you're a fan of Crime, Comedy movies, but read reviews first.
Golden Years is currently available for streaming on Amazon Prime Video. You can also check for it on platforms like Amazon Prime Video, Amazon Prime Video with Ads depending on your region.
Golden Years is a Crime, Comedy movie that follows: Fate, the pensions crisis and a steadfast refusal to accept the injustice of old age have contrived to force law abiding, retired couple, Arthur and Martha Goode into a life of crime....
Yes, Golden Years is generally suitable for family viewing as it is a Crime, Comedy movie.
Golden Years is primarily available in its original language, with subtitles and dubbed versions available on various streaming services and digital stores.
Fate, the pensions crisis and a steadfast refusal to accept the injustice of old age have contrived to force law abiding, retired couple, Arthur and Martha Goode into a life of crime.
**Sometimes, 'fightback' is the only option.** This film quite reminded me the Korean film I saw a few years ago called 'Grandma Gangsters'. That film was about a vacation, though money involves and here it was about the pension. That's a serious thing, could have been another 'I, Daniel Blake', but that's not how it goes. A very interesting and comical take on the pension crisis. What could the old people can do about it? Well, that's the point, they use an opportunity that comes their way to tackle the issue. I love films involving aged people. Not for amusement, but to see them struggle, emotionally I break down. Only those on the realistic portrayals. This title looked okay, but when I read the synopsis, I desperately wanted to see it. I knew it was a comedy, so I did not expect greater, except some good laughs. It did delivered, but I felt a few scenes were very unrealistic, even for a cinematic. Like the ending was not convincing enough. Though the rest of the film was fine. The story centres on the character Arthur played by Bernard Hill, which I first time noticed his character, particularly being in the lead since as Theodon, the King of Rohan from 'The Lord of the Rings'. So, like any film, it all begins with a simple introduction of his life and people around him. Unlike his friends, he is much able to do the stuffs at his age. Some way or the other, they are all depending on him, including his wife. Then one day he comes to know that he's not eligible anymore for his pension benefits. After thinking a lot, the heartbroken Arthur decides to take an extreme step. So begins his new adventure, and the following, his gang joins him. > ❝They may take our pensions, but they will never take our lives.❞ Does it not sound cool! Brilliant performances by all. For a theme like this, the characters have to be fit which is a stereotype that this film breaks. But there were some sacrifices like the screenplay was altered to balance between the physically weak characters and the contents that's usually fast and furious and sometimes rough handling requires. It all worked though. A crime film, yet there's no violence or the action sequences. Involves some nervous scenes and like I said earlier, the end twist should have been better. Considering how everything was developed, that was not a bad ending at all, especially keeping in mind audience point of view of what they would be expecting. It was not entirely about the old guys. The cops have a small part, including one of them was old who leads the robbery case. At some point, it looked like 'Bonnie and Clyde', which was mentioned in the storyline as well. Like a cat-and-mouse game, the events in the tale stretches as much as it can possible, providing entertainment for us. The narration could have ended in very early, though the cops were not all Sherlocks. Everything in the interest of the film to develop in the right way with little silly and more funny. Not an average film or a classic. Made with a decent budget and the fine casting, I think the film is good to try once, but I suggest not to anticipate like any outstanding heist films you have seen in your life. Learn about the film, like its storyline and its characters. If you do that you will understand its limitations, except less fun while watching the film. _7/10_
'Golden Years' is hit-and-miss in a few areas, but overall it's all a good laugh with an entertaining premise. Logically a lot of it is flawed and/or undercooked, most of the characters act strangely and the plot is kinda choppy in parts; especially across the final act. They try to force things together, whilst seemingly believing they're being much more clever and funny than they actually are. However, taking out all of that, it does produce entertainment I can't lie. The cast are very good, with Bernard Hill (Athur) and Simon Callow (Royston) standing out. Brad Moore's Stringer is a terrible character though, he adds nothing despite being a key part to the plot. It's silly and averagely written, particularly the dialogue. I can't, though, deny I did enjoy myself watching this. If you don't take it seriously, which is admittedly difficult as it sometimes comes across as if they are trying to be smart, then you'll have a good time viewing.