Is Good and Evil Worth Watching?
Answer: Maybe not, Good and Evil is likely a skip if you enjoy Documentary movies.
It features a runtime of 80 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to general audiences.

Verdict:Good and Evil is a confirmed FLOP based on our analysis of audience ratings and box office momentum.
With a rating of 4.8/10, it has delivered a mixed experience for fans of the Documentary genre.
Answer: Maybe not, Good and Evil is likely a skip if you enjoy Documentary movies.
It features a runtime of 80 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to general audiences.
Last updated: January 12, 2026
Released in the dynamic cinematic landscape of 1975, Good and Evil emerges as a significant entry in the Documentary domain. The narrative core of the film focuses on a sophisticated exploration of Jørgen Leth can squeeze poetry from a stone and wit from dust, and he can find love where the milk of human kindness runs dry. Unlike standard genre fare, Good and Evil attempts to deconstruct traditional tropes, offering a conventional take on its central themes.
The screenplay, appearing to prioritize narrative momentum and immediate impact, sets a stage where the stakes feel personal yet universal. Under the directorial eye of Jørgen Leth, every scene is crafted to contribute to the atmospheric weight of the story, ensuring that the Documentary elements serve the larger narrative arc rather than just providing spectacle.
The success of any Documentary is often anchored by its ensemble, and Good and Evil features a noteworthy lineup led by Claus Nissen. Supported by the likes of Ulla Gottlieb and Ghita Nørby, the performances bring a palpable realism to the scripted words.
Performance Analysis: While the cast delivers competent and professional performances, they are occasionally hampered by a script that leans into familiar archetypes. However, the sheer charisma of Claus Nissen, Ulla Gottlieb, Ghita Nørby manages to keep the audience invested through the film's more predictable sequences. In the broader context of 1975 cinema, these performances stand as a testament to the evolving standards of acting within the Documentary space.
From a technical perspective, Good and Evil is a marvel of 21st-century filmmaking. The cinematography, utilizing a moody and atmospheric color palette, significantly enhances the world-building aspects of the production. Each frame seems calculated to guide the viewer's emotional response, whether through wide, sweeping vistas or tight, claustrophobic close-ups that emphasize character isolation.
Technical Excellence: The production design and visual effects provide a solid foundation for the story, ensuring that the world of the film feels lived-in and authentic, even when the narrative logic falters. Furthermore, the sonic landscape—comprising both the score and sound design—adds a layer of subtextual narrative that rewards attentive viewers.
The structure of Good and Evil follows a sophisticated brisk pace. Over its 80 minute duration, the film manages to balance exposition with action in a way that remains consistently entertaining. The second act, often the most difficult to manage, serves here as a crucible for character growth, leading toward a climax that feels both inevitable and surprising.
Critically, the editing choices by the team help maintain a narrative tension that rarely wavers. The sharp, concise editing ensures that not a single frame is wasted, making the film ideal for a modern audience that values efficiency in storytelling.
Beyond its immediate entertainment value, Good and Evil resonates with contemporary social and cultural themes prevalent in the Documentary landscape of 2026. It addresses concepts such as the nature of heroism and personal legacy with a level of maturity that is often missing from major releases.
This cultural relevance is likely why it has garnered a 4.8/10 rating on our platform. Films like this bridge the gap between niche interest and global appeal, proving that stories rooted in specific human experiences can find a home with audiences worldwide, from the US and UK to India and beyond.
Analyzing the plot deeper, Good and Evil is more than just its synopsis. It is an inquiry into the boundaries of human experience. Jørgen Leth can squeeze poetry from a stone and wit from dust, and he can find love where the milk of human kindness runs dry. In a series of tableaux of Life in Denmark, he carries absurdism to a happy extreme. To act out his minuscule non-dramas, he uses a motley crew of professional actors like Ghita Nørby and Claus Nissen, writer Dan Turéll plus a snake charmer, a bicycle racer and a circus queen.
The philosophical underpinnings of the third act suggest a worldview that is standard for its genre yet executed with high professional polish. This is not just a commercial product; it is a piece of art that invites discussion long after the credits have finished rolling.
In summary, our editorial assessment of Good and Evil (1975) is overwhelmingly negative. With an audience rating of 4.8/10 and strong performance metrics in the Documentary categories, it stands as a highly recommended experience for genre enthusiasts.
Whether you choose to experience it for the stellar performances from Claus Nissen, Ulla Gottlieb, Ghita Nørby or the visual majesty of its technical execution, Good and Evil is a significant contribution to the cinema of 1975. It represents the kind of filmmaking that movieMx is proud to champion—original, bold, and ultimately, deeply human.
DocAlliance Films
DocAlliance Films
DocAlliance FilmsAnalyzing the audience sentiment, IMDb rating of 4.8/10, and global collection metrics, Good and Evil stands as a challenging project for the creators. It remains an essential piece of the 1975 cinematic year.
Good and Evil is considered a flop based on audience ratings of 4.8/10 and lower collections.
Based on the low rating of 4.8/10, Good and Evil may not be worth watching unless you are a die-hard fan.
Good and Evil is currently available for streaming on DocAlliance Films. You can also check for it on platforms like DocAlliance Films depending on your region.
Jørgen Leth can squeeze poetry from a stone and wit from dust, and he can find love where the milk of human kindness runs dry. In a series of tableaux of Life in Denmark, he carries absurdism to a happy extreme. To act out his minuscule non-dramas, he uses a motley crew of professional actors like Ghita Nørby and Claus Nissen, writer Dan Turéll plus a snake charmer, a bicycle racer and a circus queen.