Heart of a Dog backdrop - movieMx Review
Heart of a Dog movie poster - Heart of a Dog review and rating on movieMx
1988136 minDrama, Comedy, Science Fiction

Heart of a Dog

Is Heart of a Dog a Hit or Flop?

HIT

Is Heart of a Dog worth watching? With a rating of 7.877/10, this Drama, Comedy, Science Fiction film is a must-watch hit for fans of the genre. Read on for our detailed analysis and user reviews.

7.877175 votes
RateYour rating
Advertisement

Heart of a Dog Synopsis

"Heart of a Dog" is a Soviet film adaptation of Mikhail Bulgakov’s iconic novella. Set in 1920s Moscow, it tells the satirical and darkly humorous story of a stray dog named Sharik, who is transformed into a human by Professor Preobrazhensky through a daring medical experiment. The resulting man, Poligraf Poligrafovich Sharikov, embodies the social and ideological tensions of early Soviet society. With its sharp critique of class struggle, human nature, and the perils of radical change, the film is celebrated for its faithful adaptation, brilliant performances, and rich allegorical depth.

Advertisement

Top Cast

Evgeniy Evstigneev
Evgeniy EvstigneevProfessor Filipp Preobrazhenskyy
Boris Plotnikov
Boris PlotnikovDoctor Bormental
Vladimir Tolokonnikov
Vladimir TolokonnikovSharikov
Nina Ruslanova
Nina RuslanovaDarya Petrovna
Olga Melikhova
Olga MelikhovaZinochka
Aleksei Mironov
Aleksei MironovFyodor
Roman Kartsev
Roman KartsevShvonder
Anzhelika Nevolina
Anzhelika NevolinaVasnetsova
Natalya Fomenko
Natalya FomenkoVyazemskaya
Evgeniy Kuznetsov
Evgeniy KuznetsovPestrukhin

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Heart of a Dog worth watching?

Yes, Heart of a Dog is definitely worth watching! With a rating of 7.877/10, it's highly recommended for fans of Drama, Comedy, Science Fiction movies.

Is Heart of a Dog hit or flop?

Based on audience ratings (7.877/10), Heart of a Dog is considered a hit among viewers.

What genre is Heart of a Dog?

Heart of a Dog is a Drama, Comedy, Science Fiction movie that "Heart of a Dog" is a Soviet film adaptation of Mikhail Bulgakov’s iconic novella. Set in 1920s Moscow, it tells the satirical and darkly humorous sto...

You Might Also Like

Explore More

Critic Reviews

TonisFeb 28, 2025
★ 8

The story centers on Professor Filipp Filippovich Preobrazhensky, a brilliant but arrogant surgeon, who believes he can improve humanity through scientific intervention. He performs an experimental operation, transplanting the pituitary gland and testicles of a recently deceased human alcoholic and criminal, Klim Chugunkin, into a stray dog named Sharik. The experiment is initially a success, as Sharik transforms into a humanoid creature, named Polygraph Polygraphovich Sharikov. However, Sharikov embodies the worst aspects of his human donor: he is crude, aggressive, and opportunistic. He quickly becomes a disruptive force in Professor Preobrazhensky's life and the surrounding communal apartment. Sharikov, fueled by his newfound human status and a rudimentary understanding of revolutionary rhetoric, becomes a member of the local housing committee, empowered by the zealous and equally inept Comrade Shvonder. He abuses his position, wreaking havoc and threatening the professor's comfortable lifestyle. Professor Preobrazhensky, horrified by the monster he has created, realises the catastrophic consequences of his hubris. He ultimately reverses the experiment, transforming Sharikov back into a dog. The film vividly portrays the chaos and uncertainty of post-revolutionary Russia. The old social order is crumbling, and new, often ill-prepared, individuals are thrust into positions of power. The housing committee and Sharikov's rise symbolize the dangers of unchecked authority and the erosion of traditional values. Bulgakov's satire exposes the inherent flaws in human nature, regardless of social class or political ideology. Sharikov's transformation reveals the animalistic instincts that can lurk beneath the surface of human behaviour. The story serves as a cautionary tale against the dangers of attempting to radically transform society through artificial means. The film demonstrates that forcibly altering human nature can have unforeseen and disastrous consequences. The film suggests that tampering with the natural order can have unintended and destructive results. That you cannot create a "new man" by simply changing external factors. ##This review has been created with Gemini 2.0 Flash