Hunger
Performance & Direction: Hunger Review
Last updated: February 17, 2026
Quick Verdict: Hit or Flop?
Is Hunger (2008) worth watching? According to our cinematic analysis, the film stands as a HIT with a verified audience rating of 7.2/10. Whether you're looking for the box office collection, ending explained, or parents guide, our review covers everything you need to know about this Drama.
Cast Performances: A Masterclass
The success of any Drama is often anchored by its ensemble, and Hunger features a noteworthy lineup led by Michael Fassbender . Supported by the likes of Stuart Graham and Liam Cunningham , the performances bring a palpable realism to the scripted words.
Performance Analysis: While the cast delivers competent and professional performances, they are occasionally hampered by a script that leans into familiar archetypes.
Final Verdict: Is it Worth Watching?
Story & Plot Summary: Hunger
Quick Plot Summary: Released in 2008, Hunger is a Drama, History film directed by Steve McQueen. The narrative explores complex human emotions and relationships through detailed character development. This summary provides a scannable look at the movie's central conflict involving Michael Fassbender.
Story Breakdown
This character-driven narrative explores the internal and external conflicts that define the human experience. The story of Bobby Sands, the IRA member who led the 1981 hunger strike during The Troubles in which Irish Republican prisoners tried to win political status. The screenplay takes time to develop Michael Fassbender's journey, allowing audiences to connect emotionally with their struggles and triumphs. Each scene builds upon the last, creating a cumulative emotional impact.
Narrative Structure
- Opening Hook: We meet the main character in their ordinary world, establishing the emotional baseline before the inciting incident disrupts their life.
- Character Arc: The main character shows growth throughout the story, though some supporting characters could have been more fully realized. Michael Fassbender's arc is present but occasionally predictable.
- Climax & Resolution: The emotional climax brings character arcs to their natural conclusion, providing catharsis while staying true to the story's core themes.
Ending Explained: Hunger
Ending Breakdown: Directed by Steve McQueen, Hunger resolves its central conflict while maintaining thematic consistency. The finale has been praised for its approach to drama resolution.
The emotional climax centers on character transformation involving Michael Fassbender, offering viewers material for post-viewing discussion.
Ending Analysis:
- Narrative Resolution: The story concludes with clear resolution of its central conflicts, providing closure while maintaining some ambiguity.
- Character Arcs: Main characters complete meaningful transformations, reflecting the film's thematic priorities.
- Thematic Payoff: The ending reinforces the drama themes established throughout the runtime.
The final moments of Hunger reflect the filmmakers' creative choices, offering an ending that aligns with the film's tone and style.
Hunger Real vs. Reel: Is it Based on a True Story?
Hunger draws heavily from documented historical records. As a drama, history film directed by Steve McQueen, it navigates the space between factual accuracy and narrative engagement for Michael Fassbender's character.
Historical Context
The film balances historical fidelity with cinematic storytelling. Core events maintain connection to source material while adapting for theatrical presentation.
The production demonstrates respect for its source material, with attention to period detail and historical context.
Accuracy Assessment: Hunger adapts its source material for dramatic purposes. The film prioritizes thematic resonance over documentary precision.
Who Should Watch Hunger?
Worth Watching If You:
- Enjoy Drama films and don't mind familiar tropes
- Are a fan of Michael Fassbender or the director
- Want a character-driven story with emotional moments
Box Office Collection: Hunger
| Metric / Region | Collection (Approx) |
|---|---|
| Worldwide Gross | $2.7M |
| Trade Verdict | CLEAN HIT |
Top Cast: Hunger
All Cast & Crew →









Where to Watch Hunger Online?
Streaming Hub📺 Stream on
AMC+ Amazon Channel
Criterion Channel
PhiloHunger Parents Guide & Age Rating
2008 AdvisoryWondering about Hunger age rating or if it's safe for kids? Here is our cinematic advisory:
⏱️ Runtime & Duration
The total runtime of Hunger is 96 minutes (1h 36m). Ensuring you have enough time for the full cinematic experience.
Verdict Summary
Analyzing the overall audience sentiment, verified rating of 7.2/10, and global performance metrics, Hunger is classified as a HIT. It remains an essential part of the 2008 cinematic calendar.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Hunger worth watching?
Hunger is definitely worth watching if you enjoy Drama movies. It has a verified rating of 7.2/10 and stands as a HIT in our box office analysis.
Where can I find Hunger parents guide and age rating?
The official parents guide for Hunger identifies it as NR. Our detailed advisory section above covers all content warnings for families.
What is the total runtime of Hunger?
The total duration of Hunger is 96 minutes, which is approximately 1h 36m long.
Best Movies to Watch if you liked Hunger
How Hunger Compares & Where it Ranks
Critic Reviews for Hunger
Well nobody could ever accuse Michael Fassbender is giving half measures here in this graphic and brutal biopic of Irish Republican prisoner Bobby Sands. Shortly after Margaret Thatcher was elected in Britain, he was incarcerated in Belfast’s Maze Prison where his stance against not just the UK but the predominately Unionist views of the population of Northern Ireland at the time were seeing him and his fellow inmates living in what can only be described as squalid (though much of that was self-afflicted) conditions that would not have looked out of place in some South American dictatorship. His protests were falling on deaf and disinterested ears and in the end, he concluded that the ultimate sacrifice was his only option. Not that that, in itself, would solve the problems - but in the hope that it would galvanise younger generations that he was prepared to starve himself to death. The writing provides for quite soaring dialogue that is angrily pithy and effective at illustrating just how divided this community was, but essentially it is the raw imagery that does almost almost all of the heavy lifting. Now the one thing it doesn’t try to do is offer us any sort of balance. Naturally, from his perspective, it is profoundly anti-British, but it does not really spend any time on the historical situation that bedevils this province, still. Much of the violence carried out in the prison was carried out by his fellow Irishmen - a section of the population every bit as convinced by their own beliefs as Sands was by his. It’s this one-sidedness that lets this down a little, especially as the photography towards the end almost sanctifies an actor who already has the eyes and visage to suit that purpose, but there can be no doubt as we watch his steady journey into emaciation that this was a principled man who endured much for his cause. It’s quite a grim watch that does little to inform on the still ongoing debate about Irish unity/Britishness but it is definitely worth watching.
Ouch. Margaret Thatcher was a huge bitch. If people can watch this movie and not realize that oversized, corrupt governments are pure evil, then something is deeply wrong. Fassbinder is absolutely phenomenal in this.
movieMx Verified
This review has been verified for accuracy and editorial quality by our senior cinematic analysts.
This analysis is compiled by our editorial experts using multi-source verification and audience sentiment data for maximum accuracy.










