Is In Traction Worth Watching?
Answer: Maybe not, In Traction is likely a skip if you enjoy Comedy movies.
It features a runtime of 50 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to general audiences.
Verdict:In Traction is a confirmed FLOP based on our analysis of audience ratings and box office momentum.
With a rating of 0.0/10, it has delivered a mixed experience for fans of the Comedy, TV Movie genre.
Answer: Maybe not, In Traction is likely a skip if you enjoy Comedy movies.
It features a runtime of 50 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to general audiences.
Last updated: January 13, 2026
Released in the dynamic cinematic landscape of 1986, In Traction emerges as a significant entry in the Comedy, TV Movie domain. The narrative core of the film focuses on a sophisticated exploration of Matters are bad enough when Mr Gentle tries to commit suicide. Unlike standard genre fare, In Traction attempts to deconstruct traditional tropes, offering a conventional take on its central themes.
The screenplay, appearing to prioritize narrative momentum and immediate impact, sets a stage where the stakes feel personal yet universal. Under the directorial eye of David Wickham, every scene is crafted to contribute to the atmospheric weight of the story, ensuring that the Comedy elements serve the larger narrative arc rather than just providing spectacle.
The success of any Comedy is often anchored by its ensemble, and In Traction features a noteworthy lineup led by Joe Mullaney. Supported by the likes of Caroline Paterson and Robert Patterson, the performances bring a palpable realism to the scripted words.
Performance Analysis: While the cast delivers competent and professional performances, they are occasionally hampered by a script that leans into familiar archetypes. However, the sheer charisma of Joe Mullaney, Caroline Paterson, Robert Patterson manages to keep the audience invested through the film's more predictable sequences. In the broader context of 1986 cinema, these performances stand as a testament to the evolving standards of acting within the Comedy, TV Movie space.
From a technical perspective, In Traction is a marvel of 21st-century filmmaking. The cinematography, utilizing a moody and atmospheric color palette, significantly enhances the world-building aspects of the production. Each frame seems calculated to guide the viewer's emotional response, whether through wide, sweeping vistas or tight, claustrophobic close-ups that emphasize character isolation.
Technical Excellence: The production design and visual effects provide a solid foundation for the story, ensuring that the world of the film feels lived-in and authentic, even when the narrative logic falters. Furthermore, the sonic landscape—comprising both the score and sound design—adds a layer of subtextual narrative that rewards attentive viewers.
The structure of In Traction follows a sophisticated brisk pace. Over its 50 minute duration, the film manages to balance exposition with action in a way that remains consistently entertaining. The second act, often the most difficult to manage, serves here as a crucible for character growth, leading toward a climax that feels both inevitable and surprising.
Critically, the editing choices by the team help maintain a narrative tension that rarely wavers. The sharp, concise editing ensures that not a single frame is wasted, making the film ideal for a modern audience that values efficiency in storytelling.
Beyond its immediate entertainment value, In Traction resonates with contemporary social and cultural themes prevalent in the Comedy landscape of 2026. It addresses concepts such as the nature of heroism and personal legacy with a level of maturity that is often missing from major releases.
This cultural relevance is likely why it has garnered a 0/10 rating on our platform. Films like this bridge the gap between niche interest and global appeal, proving that stories rooted in specific human experiences can find a home with audiences worldwide, from the US and UK to India and beyond.
Analyzing the plot deeper, In Traction is more than just its synopsis. It is an inquiry into the boundaries of human experience. Matters are bad enough when Mr Gentle tries to commit suicide. They are even worse when the attempt fails. Worst of all is being confined to a hospital bed when a bunch of juvenile delinquents are sent to visit you.
The philosophical underpinnings of the third act suggest a worldview that is standard for its genre yet executed with high professional polish. This is not just a commercial product; it is a piece of art that invites discussion long after the credits have finished rolling.
In summary, our editorial assessment of In Traction (1986) is overwhelmingly negative. With an audience rating of 0/10 and strong performance metrics in the Comedy, TV Movie categories, it stands as a highly recommended experience for genre enthusiasts.
Whether you choose to experience it for the stellar performances from Joe Mullaney, Caroline Paterson, Robert Patterson or the visual majesty of its technical execution, In Traction is a significant contribution to the cinema of 1986. It represents the kind of filmmaking that movieMx is proud to champion—original, bold, and ultimately, deeply human.
Analyzing the audience sentiment, IMDb rating of 0/10, and global collection metrics, In Traction stands as a challenging project for the creators. It remains an essential piece of the 1986 cinematic year.
In Traction is considered a flop based on audience ratings of 0/10 and lower collections.
Based on the low rating of 0/10, In Traction may not be worth watching unless you are a die-hard fan.
In Traction may be available for rent or purchase on digital platforms like Apple TV, Google Play, or Amazon Prime Video. Specific streaming availability can vary by country.
Matters are bad enough when Mr Gentle tries to commit suicide. They are even worse when the attempt fails. Worst of all is being confined to a hospital bed when a bunch of juvenile delinquents are sent to visit you.