Is Irresistible Worth Watching?
Answer: Maybe not, Irresistible is likely a skip if you enjoy Science Fiction movies.
It features a runtime of 85 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to general audiences.
Verdict:Irresistible is a confirmed FLOP based on our analysis of audience ratings and box office momentum.
With a rating of 4.0/10, it has delivered a mixed experience for fans of the Science Fiction genre.
Answer: Maybe not, Irresistible is likely a skip if you enjoy Science Fiction movies.
It features a runtime of 85 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to general audiences.
Last updated: January 13, 2026
Released in the dynamic cinematic landscape of 1982, Irresistible emerges as a significant entry in the Science Fiction domain. The narrative core of the film focuses on a sophisticated exploration of Imagine being able to travel back into time and be welcomed into the intimate bedrooms of the most notorious women ever to embarrass history. Unlike standard genre fare, Irresistible attempts to deconstruct traditional tropes, offering a conventional take on its central themes.
The screenplay, appearing to prioritize narrative momentum and immediate impact, sets a stage where the stakes feel personal yet universal. Under the directorial eye of Edwin Brown, every scene is crafted to contribute to the atmospheric weight of the story, ensuring that the Science Fiction elements serve the larger narrative arc rather than just providing spectacle.
The success of any Science Fiction is often anchored by its ensemble, and Irresistible features a noteworthy lineup led by Richard Pacheco. Supported by the likes of Samantha Fox and Dorothy LeMay, the performances bring a palpable realism to the scripted words.
Performance Analysis: While the cast delivers competent and professional performances, they are occasionally hampered by a script that leans into familiar archetypes. However, the sheer charisma of Richard Pacheco, Samantha Fox, Dorothy LeMay manages to keep the audience invested through the film's more predictable sequences. In the broader context of 1982 cinema, these performances stand as a testament to the evolving standards of acting within the Science Fiction space.
From a technical perspective, Irresistible is a marvel of 21st-century filmmaking. The cinematography, utilizing a moody and atmospheric color palette, significantly enhances the world-building aspects of the production. Each frame seems calculated to guide the viewer's emotional response, whether through wide, sweeping vistas or tight, claustrophobic close-ups that emphasize character isolation.
Technical Excellence: The production design and visual effects provide a solid foundation for the story, ensuring that the world of the film feels lived-in and authentic, even when the narrative logic falters. Furthermore, the sonic landscape—comprising both the score and sound design—adds a layer of subtextual narrative that rewards attentive viewers.
The structure of Irresistible follows a sophisticated brisk pace. Over its 85 minute duration, the film manages to balance exposition with action in a way that remains consistently entertaining. The second act, often the most difficult to manage, serves here as a crucible for character growth, leading toward a climax that feels both inevitable and surprising.
Critically, the editing choices by the team help maintain a narrative tension that rarely wavers. The sharp, concise editing ensures that not a single frame is wasted, making the film ideal for a modern audience that values efficiency in storytelling.
Beyond its immediate entertainment value, Irresistible resonates with contemporary social and cultural themes prevalent in the Science Fiction landscape of 2026. It addresses concepts such as the nature of heroism and personal legacy with a level of maturity that is often missing from major releases.
This cultural relevance is likely why it has garnered a 4/10 rating on our platform. Films like this bridge the gap between niche interest and global appeal, proving that stories rooted in specific human experiences can find a home with audiences worldwide, from the US and UK to India and beyond.
Analyzing the plot deeper, Irresistible is more than just its synopsis. It is an inquiry into the boundaries of human experience. Imagine being able to travel back into time and be welcomed into the intimate bedrooms of the most notorious women ever to embarrass history. Well it happens to Walter Brooks thanks to Miracle Myers' time machine – just when he needs it most. First, Walter finds himself alone with the sultry Cleopatra who draws Walter into the steaming depths of her inner, secret pleasures. From there he travels to explore the innocent young flower, Juliet, with Romeo courting her from beneath her window. This seduction is so successful, however, that Juliet falls in love with Walter and follows him back to the 20th Century, creating a paradox in paradise and putting Walter in deep trouble.
The philosophical underpinnings of the third act suggest a worldview that is standard for its genre yet executed with high professional polish. This is not just a commercial product; it is a piece of art that invites discussion long after the credits have finished rolling.
In summary, our editorial assessment of Irresistible (1982) is overwhelmingly negative. With an audience rating of 4/10 and strong performance metrics in the Science Fiction categories, it stands as a highly recommended experience for genre enthusiasts.
Whether you choose to experience it for the stellar performances from Richard Pacheco, Samantha Fox, Dorothy LeMay or the visual majesty of its technical execution, Irresistible is a significant contribution to the cinema of 1982. It represents the kind of filmmaking that movieMx is proud to champion—original, bold, and ultimately, deeply human.
Analyzing the audience sentiment, IMDb rating of 4/10, and global collection metrics, Irresistible stands as a challenging project for the creators. It remains an essential piece of the 1982 cinematic year.
Irresistible is considered a flop based on audience ratings of 4/10 and lower collections.
Based on the low rating of 4/10, Irresistible may not be worth watching unless you are a die-hard fan.
Irresistible may be available for rent or purchase on digital platforms like Apple TV, Google Play, or Amazon Prime Video. Specific streaming availability can vary by country.
Imagine being able to travel back into time and be welcomed into the intimate bedrooms of the most notorious women ever to embarrass history. Well it happens to Walter Brooks thanks to Miracle Myers' time machine – just when he needs it most. First, Walter finds himself alone with the sultry Cleopatra who draws Walter into the steaming depths of her inner, secret pleasures. From there he travels to explore the innocent young flower, Juliet, with Romeo courting her from beneath her window. This seduction is so successful, however, that Juliet falls in love with Walter and follows him back to the 20th Century, creating a paradox in paradise and putting Walter in deep trouble.