J. R. R. Tolkien's The Hobbit backdrop - movieMx Review
J. R. R. Tolkien's The Hobbit movie poster - J. R. R. Tolkien's The Hobbit review and rating on movieMx
196712 minAnimation, Fantasy, Adventure

J. R. R. Tolkien's The Hobbit

Is J. R. R. Tolkien's The Hobbit a Hit or Flop?

FLOP

Is J. R. R. Tolkien's The Hobbit worth watching? With a rating of 5.393/10, this Animation, Fantasy, Adventure film is a mixed-bag for fans of the genre. Read on for our detailed analysis and user reviews.

5.39342 votes
RateYour rating
Advertisement

J. R. R. Tolkien's The Hobbit Synopsis

The very first movie adaptation of J.R.R Tolkien's The Hobbit. Made in just 30 days so that the producer could keep the rights to Tolkien's books.

Advertisement

Top Cast

Herbert Lass
Herbert LassNarrator (voice)

Frequently Asked Questions

Is J. R. R. Tolkien's The Hobbit worth watching?

J. R. R. Tolkien's The Hobbit has received mixed reviews with a 5.393/10 rating. It might be worth watching if you're a fan of Animation, Fantasy, Adventure movies.

Is J. R. R. Tolkien's The Hobbit hit or flop?

J. R. R. Tolkien's The Hobbit has received average ratings (5.393/10), performing moderately with audiences.

What genre is J. R. R. Tolkien's The Hobbit?

J. R. R. Tolkien's The Hobbit is a Animation, Fantasy, Adventure movie that The very first movie adaptation of J.R.R Tolkien's The Hobbit. Made in just 30 days so that the producer could keep the rights to Tolkien's books....

You Might Also Like

Explore More

Critic Reviews

pokycoderMar 15, 2022
★ 0

So bad that it's almost good. That's about all I can say about this one. When you understand that it was hurriedly thrown together to ensure future access to film rights, that it was never theatrically released (only screened one time), and that it was only published in 2012, it actually becomes an amusing little gem(?) in the history of Tolkien's epic saga of Middle-Earth. To be totally honest, it doesn't deviate as much from the story as did Peter Jackson's The Hobbit trilogy (and only slightly more than his The Lord of the Rings). It's well worth the quarter of an hour it takes to view it, if only to say that you did. No film adaptation of this beloved book does it justice. I grew up with the Rankin/Bass version, and it's pretty skewed as well (but Glen Yarbrough's music almost makes up for it). The list of discrepancies between Tolkien's The Hobbit and this short are numerous, but here are some highlights: * The Lonely Mountain is only the "Diamond Mine of Dale" * There are no Dwarves or Elves mentioned * The only survivors of Dale are "Torin" Oakenshield, "Princess Mika Milovana," and a lazy watchman (who is clearly not Bard, as Bard is not in the film at all) * Gandalf serves only to send Bilbo out the door and does not join in the quest at all * The three survivors from Dale and Bilbo make up the entire company * The Trolls are instead called "Groans" and turn to dead trees in the sunlight * Bilbo falls through a crevice past the Goblins, which instead are called "Grablins" (which are mentioned but do not enter into the plot in the slightest) directly to Gollum's island (only his name is "Gooloom"), where the Ring is instantly on his finger and does not make him invisible * No Eagles, Beorn, Mirkwood Elves, or Spiders; just a quick summary of walking nearly endlessly in Mirkwook before coming to the Lonely Mountain * The Arkenstone is fashioned into an arrowhead and shot into Smaug's heart while he sleeps by Bilbo and the Company (but they call the dragon "Slag") * Bilbo and Princess Mika fall in love and rule over the rebuilt Dale before returning to Hobbiton (the Shire is never mentioned)