Is Lili au lit Worth Watching?
Answer: Maybe not, Lili au lit is likely a skip if you enjoy movies.
It features a runtime of 0 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to general audiences.
Verdict:Lili au lit is a confirmed FLOP based on our analysis of audience ratings and box office momentum.
With a rating of 0.0/10, it has delivered a mixed experience for fans of the genre.
Answer: Maybe not, Lili au lit is likely a skip if you enjoy movies.
It features a runtime of 0 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to general audiences.
Last updated: January 10, 2026
Released in 1965, Lili au lit enters the Film genre with a narrative focused on Who wants to go to bed with Lili?. Under the direction of Roland Lethem, the film attempts to weave detailed character arcs with visual storytelling.
The film is anchored by performances from Dominique André, Roland Lethem, Claude Lombard. While the cast delivers competent performances, the script occasionally limits their range.
From a technical standpoint, Lili au lit offers a competent presentation. The cinematography aligns well with the tone, keeping the narrative moving at a brisk pace.
As of January 2026, Lili au lit is available in theaters worldwide. For streaming audiences in the US and UK, look for availability on major platforms roughly 45 days after the theatrical release. Check your local listings for specific showtimes.
With an audience rating of 0/10, the reception has been negative. For fans of , it serves as a skippable entry unless you go in with lowered expectations.


Analyzing the audience sentiment, IMDb rating of 0/10, and global collection metrics, Lili au lit stands as a challenging project for the creators. It remains an essential piece of the 1965 cinematic year.
Lili au lit is considered a flop based on audience ratings of 0/10 and lower collections.
Based on the low rating of 0/10, Lili au lit may not be worth watching unless you are a die-hard fan.
Lili au lit is a movie that Who wants to go to bed with Lili?...
No reviews found for this filter.