Is Love in the Office Worth Watching?
Answer: Maybe not, Love in the Office is likely a skip if you enjoy Comedy movies.
It features a runtime of 0 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to general audiences.
Love in the Office Review
Last updated: January 10, 2026
The Premise
Released in 2015, Love in the Office enters the Comedy genre with a narrative focused on delivering a compelling story. Under the direction of Liang Hou, the film attempts to weave detailed character arcs with visual storytelling.
Cast & Performance
The film is anchored by performances from Chen He, Yao Xingtong. While the cast delivers competent performances, the script occasionally limits their range.
Technical Aspects & Direction
From a technical standpoint, Love in the Office offers a competent presentation. The cinematography aligns well with the tone, keeping the narrative moving at a brisk pace.
Where to Watch
As of January 2026, Love in the Office is available in theaters worldwide. For streaming audiences in the US and UK, look for availability on major platforms roughly 45 days after the theatrical release. Check your local listings for specific showtimes.
Final Thoughts
With an audience rating of 4/10, the reception has been negative. For fans of Comedy, it serves as a skippable entry unless you go in with lowered expectations.
Cast of Love in the Office
- Chen He –
- Yao Xingtong –
Top Highlights
Chen He
Yao Xingtong
Final Verdict
Analyzing the audience sentiment, IMDb rating of 4/10, and global collection metrics, Love in the Office stands as a challenging project for the creators. It remains an essential piece of the 2015 cinematic year.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Love in the Office movie hit or flop?
Love in the Office is considered a flop based on audience ratings of 4/10 and lower collections.
Is Love in the Office worth watching?
Based on the low rating of 4/10, Love in the Office may not be worth watching unless you are a die-hard fan.
What genre is Love in the Office?
Love in the Office is a Comedy movie that ...
