Lust for a Vampire
Performance & Direction: Lust for a Vampire Review
Last updated: February 15, 2026
Quick Verdict: Hit or Flop?
Is Lust for a Vampire (1971) worth watching? According to our cinematic analysis, the film stands as a ABOVE AVERAGE with a verified audience rating of 5.8/10. Whether you're looking for the box office collection, ending explained, or parents guide, our review covers everything you need to know about this Horror.
Cast Performances: A Masterclass
The success of any Horror is often anchored by its ensemble, and Lust for a Vampire features a noteworthy lineup led by Barbara Jefford . Supported by the likes of Ralph Bates and Suzanna Leigh , the performances bring a palpable realism to the scripted words.
Performance Analysis: While the cast delivers competent and professional performances, they are occasionally hampered by a script that leans into familiar archetypes.
Final Verdict: Is it Worth Watching?
Story & Plot Summary: Lust for a Vampire
Quick Plot Summary: Released in 1971, Lust for a Vampire is a Horror film directed by Jimmy Sangster. The narrative crafts an atmosphere of dread and suspense, using psychological terror and visual scares. This summary provides a scannable look at the movie's central conflict involving Barbara Jefford.
Ending Explained: Lust for a Vampire
Ending Breakdown: Directed by Jimmy Sangster, Lust for a Vampire attempts to tie together its various plot elements. The finale presents its approach to horror resolution.
The conclusion addresses the core thematic questions involving Barbara Jefford, offering viewers material for post-viewing discussion.
Ending Analysis:
- Narrative Resolution: The story concludes by addressing its primary narrative threads, providing closure while maintaining some ambiguity.
- Character Arcs: Character journeys reach their narrative endpoints, reflecting the film's thematic priorities.
- Thematic Payoff: The ending reinforces the horror themes established throughout the runtime.
The final moments of Lust for a Vampire reflect the filmmakers' creative choices, offering an ending that aligns with the film's tone and style.
Who Should Watch Lust for a Vampire?
Consider Watching If:
- You're a completist for Horror films
- You're curious despite mixed reviews
- You have low expectations and want casual entertainment
Top Cast: Lust for a Vampire
All Cast & Crew →







Where to Watch Lust for a Vampire Online?
Streaming Hub📺 Stream on
Philo
FlixFling
Shout! Factory Amazon Channel🎟️ Rent on
Amazon Video
FlixFling🏷️ Buy on
Amazon Video
FlixFlingLust for a Vampire Parents Guide & Age Rating
1971 AdvisoryWondering about Lust for a Vampire age rating or if it's safe for kids? Here is our cinematic advisory:
⏱️ Runtime & Duration
The total runtime of Lust for a Vampire is 91 minutes (1h 31m). Ensuring you have enough time for the full cinematic experience.
Verdict Summary
Analyzing the overall audience sentiment, verified rating of 5.8/10, and global performance metrics, Lust for a Vampire is classified as a ABOVE AVERAGE. It remains an essential part of the 1971 cinematic calendar.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Lust for a Vampire worth watching?
Lust for a Vampire is definitely worth watching if you enjoy Horror movies. It has a verified rating of 5.8/10 and stands as a ABOVE AVERAGE in our box office analysis.
Where can I find Lust for a Vampire parents guide and age rating?
The official parents guide for Lust for a Vampire identifies it as R. Our detailed advisory section above covers all content warnings for families.
What is the total runtime of Lust for a Vampire?
The total duration of Lust for a Vampire is 91 minutes, which is approximately 1h 31m long.
Best Movies to Watch if you liked Lust for a Vampire
How Lust for a Vampire Compares & Where it Ranks
Critic Reviews for Lust for a Vampire
Confessions of a Vampire Vixen! Lust for a Vampire is directed by Jimmy Sangster and written by Tudor Gates who uses characters written by Sheridan Le Fanu. It stars Ralph Bates, Barbara Jefford, Suzanna Leigh, Michael Johnson, Yutte Stensgaard, Helen Christie and Pippa Steel. Music is by Harry Robinson and Technicolor cinematography by David Muir. The second part of Hammer Films' "Karnstein Trilogy", "Lust for a Vampire" seemed destined to be miserable from the get go. Peter Cushing had to leave the production when his darling wife fell gravely ill, Hammer's best director Terence Fisher had to also bail out, while Gates had his original romantically literate script jettisoned for one more concerned with nudey prod games. What eventually plays out on screen is a tepid and confused movie, more concerned with bosom baiting than anything resembling a coherent and dramatic horror story. Pretty much everyone involved with making it disowned it, and it's not hard to see why. From production goofs to the inappropriate cheesy pop song that assaults the ears during a love making scene, the film is badly constructed and just functions to purely show some buxom flesh in the hope that it itself will be enough. A couple of scenes are smart, particularly the resurrection of the main vampire babe, and the colour and costuming is up to Hammer's high standards, yet you can see Hammer straining for inspiration to take the 70s by storm. The cracks in their magnificent armour were just starting to show. The only real surprise is that Robin Askwith isn't in it, he could have used it as a warm up for his "Confessions Of" series of films that were soon to surface... 4/10
**_Gothic drama/romance marked by villages, castles, maidens and vampirism_** In 1830, a writer (Michael Johnson) visits a village in the shadow of the diabolic Karnstein Castle in Austria whereupon he decides to teach at a nearby female school after meeting a lovely new pupil (Yutte Stensgaard). Another student (Pippa Steel) and the headmaster (Ralph Bates) are also enamored by Mircalla. What is the secret of her magnetism? Could she be the reincarnation of Countess Carmilla Karnstein, who died in 1710? Christopher Lee lookalike Mike Raven is on hand as sinister Count Karnstein. “Lust for a Vampire” (1971) takes place forty years after the events of the previous film, “The Vampire Lovers,” released the previous year. These movies were loosely based on Irish novelist Sheridan Le Fanu's "Carmilla," which was published in 1872, predating Bram Stoker's "Dracula" by 25 years. Hammer’s ‘Karnstein trilogy’ is completed by the prequel “Twins of Evil” (1971). Blonde Dane Yutte Stensgaard is noticeably younger than Ingrid Pitt, who played Mircalla in the previous movie (and was offered the role here); Yutte was 24 during shooting while Ingrid was 32. There are, unsurprisingly, several fetching females due to the milieu, not to mention some top nudity (just a heads up). While Ralph Bates called it "one of the worst films ever made," all three in the trilogy are of about the same quality, although “The Vampire Lovers” is the most popular for obvious reasons (the overt sapphism, which is toned down here and in “Twins”). I think Bates didn’t like it because of his sniveling character, Giles Barton, who plays second fiddle to the dashing protagonist (Johnson). Producers insisted on including the pop song “Strange Love,” performed by Tracy, after the success of “Rain Drops Keep Fallin’ on My Head” in “Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid” (1969). As far as I’m concerned, it fits the scene of the movie and isn’t jolting like “Rain Drops” in “Butch Cassidy.” In some ways, “Lust for a Vampire” is reminiscent of later movies “The Wicker Man” (1973) and “Picnic at Hanging Rock” (1975) due to the progressive girl’s school, just with the addition of Gothic vampirism. The film runs 1 hour, 35 minutes, and was shot at Elstree Studios outside London to the north. The finishing school is located a little further northwest at Hunton Park. GRADE: B-/B
movieMx Verified
This review has been verified for accuracy and editorial quality by our senior cinematic analysts.
This analysis is compiled by our editorial experts using multi-source verification and audience sentiment data for maximum accuracy.
Useful Links
More with Barbara Jefford
View full filmographyPart of the Karnstein (Hammer) Collection
Explore the full watch order, ratings, and collection details.
View Full Franchise








