Macbeth
Performance & Direction: Macbeth Review
Last updated: February 14, 2026
Quick Verdict: Hit or Flop?
Is Macbeth (1948) worth watching? According to our cinematic analysis, the film stands as a HIT with a verified audience rating of 7.2/10. Whether you're looking for the box office collection, ending explained, or parents guide, our review covers everything you need to know about this Drama.
Cast Performances: A Masterclass
The success of any Drama is often anchored by its ensemble, and Macbeth features a noteworthy lineup led by Orson Welles . Supported by the likes of Jeanette Nolan and Dan O'Herlihy , the performances bring a palpable realism to the scripted words.
Performance Analysis: While the cast delivers competent and professional performances, they are occasionally hampered by a script that leans into familiar archetypes.
Final Verdict: Is it Worth Watching?
Story & Plot Summary: Macbeth
Quick Plot Summary: Released in 1948, Macbeth is a Drama film directed by Orson Welles. The narrative explores complex human emotions and relationships through detailed character development. This summary provides a scannable look at the movie's central conflict involving Orson Welles.
Ending Explained: Macbeth
Ending Breakdown: Directed by Orson Welles, Macbeth resolves its central conflict while maintaining thematic consistency. The finale has been praised for its approach to drama resolution.
The emotional climax centers on character transformation involving Orson Welles, offering viewers material for post-viewing discussion.
Ending Analysis:
- Narrative Resolution: The story concludes with clear resolution of its central conflicts, providing closure while maintaining some ambiguity.
- Character Arcs: Main characters complete meaningful transformations, reflecting the film's thematic priorities.
- Thematic Payoff: The ending reinforces the drama themes established throughout the runtime.
The final moments of Macbeth reflect the filmmakers' creative choices, offering an ending that aligns with the film's tone and style.
Who Should Watch Macbeth?
Worth Watching If You:
- Enjoy Drama films and don't mind familiar tropes
- Are a fan of Orson Welles or the director
- Want a character-driven story with emotional moments
Top Cast: Macbeth
All Cast & Crew →










Where to Watch Macbeth Online?
Streaming Hub🎟️ Rent on
Apple TV Store
maxdome Store🏷️ Buy on
Amazon Video
Apple TV Store
Google Play Movies
maxdome StoreMacbeth Parents Guide & Age Rating
1948 AdvisoryWondering about Macbeth age rating or if it's safe for kids? Here is our cinematic advisory:
⏱️ Runtime & Duration
The total runtime of Macbeth is 107 minutes (1h 47m). Ensuring you have enough time for the full cinematic experience.
Verdict Summary
Analyzing the overall audience sentiment, verified rating of 7.2/10, and global performance metrics, Macbeth is classified as a HIT. It remains an essential part of the 1948 cinematic calendar.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Macbeth worth watching?
Macbeth is definitely worth watching if you enjoy Drama movies. It has a verified rating of 7.2/10 and stands as a HIT in our box office analysis.
Where can I find Macbeth parents guide and age rating?
The official parents guide for Macbeth identifies it as NR. Our detailed advisory section above covers all content warnings for families.
What is the total runtime of Macbeth?
The total duration of Macbeth is 107 minutes, which is approximately 1h 47m long.
Best Movies to Watch if you liked Macbeth
How Macbeth Compares & Where it Ranks
Critic Reviews for Macbeth
Macbeth (Orson Welles) is travelling across a misty moor one evening when he encounters three mysterious women whom acclaim him Thane of Cawdor. His is surely Thane of Glamis, and Cawdor is another man altogether - or is he? Then they proclaim that he shall be King of Scotland - and remain so unless some seemingly impossible circumstances combine to bring about his downfall. Empowered by their prophecy, he returns to the castle of King Duncan (Erskine Sanford) where he divulges his secret to his ruthlessly ambitious wife (Jeanette Nolan) thus setting in motion some regicidal scheming that will install him on the throne - but at what cost to him, his wife and his kingdom. This is certainly my favourite Shakespeare play, full of darkness and mysticism; of betrayal, duplicity and as near to actual evil as I think the stage has ever got. Though maybe Welles ought not to have been costumed as a Mongolian warlord, his efforts otherwise to master some of the most powerful soliloquies in the English language are impressive. Nolan also contributes well as the devious, downright malevolent wife who cares for power and him and little else. The supporting cast do enough, but there is a paucity of actual Scots actors here. The eeriness and creepiness of the thing might have benefitted more from the likes of Finlay Currie and John Laurie rather than from Dan O'Herlihy; the really lacklustre efforts of Roddy McDowell as "Malcolm" - son of a murdered father, nor of Edgar Barrier's a-haunting "Banquo". John Russell's photography and Fred Ritter's art direction use the sound stage space well creating a plausible series of impressions of the near twenty year reign of this 11th century monarch. As ever with this bard, he uses approaching armies and battles effectively, but nowhere near as effectively as he uses the human psyche to generate fear, guilt and paranoia - and again, Welles delivers the role of the increasingly troubled man strongly. It is still better seen at a theatre, but as big screen adaptations go, this is a creatively menacing depiction that has held up well.
movieMx Verified
This review has been verified for accuracy and editorial quality by our senior cinematic analysts.
This analysis is compiled by our editorial experts using multi-source verification and audience sentiment data for maximum accuracy.










