Necromancy
Performance & Direction: Necromancy Review
Last updated: February 26, 2026
Quick Verdict: Hit or Flop?
Is Necromancy (1972) worth watching? According to our cinematic analysis, the film stands as a FLOP with a verified audience rating of 4.4/10. Whether you're looking for the box office collection, ending explained, or parents guide, our review covers everything you need to know about this Horror.
Cast Performances: A Masterclass
The success of any Horror is often anchored by its ensemble, and Necromancy features a noteworthy lineup led by Orson Welles . Supported by the likes of Pamela Franklin and Lee Purcell , the performances bring a palpable realism to the scripted words.
Performance Analysis: While the cast delivers competent and professional performances, they are occasionally hampered by a script that leans into familiar archetypes.
Final Verdict: Is it Worth Watching?
Story & Plot Summary: Necromancy
Quick Plot Summary: Released in 1972, Necromancy is a Horror film directed by Bert I. Gordon. The narrative crafts an atmosphere of dread and suspense, using psychological terror and visual scares. This summary provides a scannable look at the movie's central conflict involving Orson Welles.
Ending Explained: Necromancy
Ending Breakdown: Directed by Bert I. Gordon, Necromancy attempts to tie together its various plot elements. The finale presents its approach to horror resolution.
The conclusion addresses the core thematic questions involving Orson Welles, offering viewers material for post-viewing discussion.
Ending Analysis:
- Narrative Resolution: The story concludes by addressing its primary narrative threads, providing closure while maintaining some ambiguity.
- Character Arcs: Character journeys reach their narrative endpoints, reflecting the film's thematic priorities.
- Thematic Payoff: The ending reinforces the horror themes established throughout the runtime.
The final moments of Necromancy reflect the filmmakers' creative choices, offering an ending that aligns with the film's tone and style.
Who Should Watch Necromancy?
Consider Watching If:
- You're a completist for Horror films
- You're curious despite mixed reviews
- You have low expectations and want casual entertainment
Top Cast: Necromancy
All Cast & Crew →






Where to Watch Necromancy Online?
Streaming Hub🎟️ Rent on
Amazon Video🏷️ Buy on
Amazon VideoNecromancy Parents Guide & Age Rating
1972 AdvisoryWondering about Necromancy age rating or if it's safe for kids? Here is our cinematic advisory:
⏱️ Runtime & Duration
The total runtime of Necromancy is 82 minutes (1h 22m). Ensuring you have enough time for the full cinematic experience.
Verdict Summary
Analyzing the overall audience sentiment, verified rating of 4.4/10, and global performance metrics, Necromancy is classified as a FLOP. It remains an essential part of the 1972 cinematic calendar.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Necromancy worth watching?
Necromancy is definitely worth watching if you enjoy Horror movies. It has a verified rating of 4.4/10 and stands as a FLOP in our box office analysis.
Where can I find Necromancy parents guide and age rating?
The official parents guide for Necromancy identifies it as PG. Our detailed advisory section above covers all content warnings for families.
What is the total runtime of Necromancy?
The total duration of Necromancy is 82 minutes, which is approximately 1h 22m long.
Best Movies to Watch if you liked Necromancy
How Necromancy Compares & Where it Ranks
Critic Reviews for Necromancy
_**Occult-oriented flick starring Pamela Franklin and Orson Welles**_ A young couple from Los Angeles (Pamela Franklin & Michael Ontkean) gets an offer they can’t refuse and move to a town several hours up north. But why does the dubious mogul of the exclusive community (Orson Welles) want them so bad? Something sinister is going on. "Necromancy" was made in 1970, but not released until 1972 (although copyrighted 1971). It combines elements of “Carnival of Souls” (1962), “Rosemary’s Baby” (1968) and “The Devil Rides Out” (1968); plus it would influence the future “Satan’s School for Girls” (1973). In some ways it’s better than those films and in others worse. For one thing, the editing is sometimes off-kilter or inconsistent, especially in the first half, which I don’t know if it was done intentionally or if it’s simply sloppy filmmaking. A good example is the girl’s lighthearted disposition in the car after just being involved in an accident and witnessing firsthand an unconscious person burning alive. Due to Welles’ involvement, the flick was reissued in 1983 under the title “The Witching” with added scenes of full frontal nudity during a ritual featuring Brinke Stevens, plus other changes and a tacked-on ending. I’ve seen Pamela Franklin in about six films and she easily looks her best here with a full brunette mane. She was 20 during shooting and would meet her near-future husband on set, the young doctor played by Harvey Jason. They remain married today, over fifty years later. Pamela didn’t speak well of working with Welles, who obviously took the gig for easy cash (and tries unsuccessfully to hide behind a prosthetic nose and fake beard). She said he was dismissive of other actors, summing up her feelings with: “He was not a nice person.” By contrast, she worked with Marlon Brando two years earlier on “The Night of the Following Day” and said he treated everyone equal. Director Bert I. Gordon (known for 1965’s entertaining “Village of the Giants”) was concerned that he’d have serious issues with Welles when his secretary informed him that he didn’t work before 10:00 or after 4:00. So Gordon assuaged Welles with a decadent chef and all his preferred foods & drinks; thus the imposing thespian was quite agreeable, yet this didn’t eliminate Pamela’s criticisms. The flick scores well in the feminine department. Besides Franklin in her prime, there’s Lee Purcell, who was 23 during shooting, and petite redhead Sue Bernard, best known for her role as the winsome bikini girl in “Faster, Pussycat! Kill! Kill!” (1965). The movie runs 1 hour, 23 minutes, and was shot at Los Gatos, California, which is about 35 miles southeast of San Francisco; as well as Samuel Goldwyn Studios in Hollywood. GRADE: B-/C+
movieMx Verified
This review has been verified for accuracy and editorial quality by our senior cinematic analysts.
This analysis is compiled by our editorial experts using multi-source verification and audience sentiment data for maximum accuracy.










