Is Ninja vs. Ninja Worth Watching?
Answer: Maybe not, Ninja vs. Ninja is likely a skip if you enjoy Action movies.
It features a runtime of 0 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to general audiences.
Verdict:Ninja vs. Ninja is a confirmed FLOP based on our analysis of audience ratings and box office momentum.
With a rating of 4.3/10, it has delivered a mixed experience for fans of the Action genre.
Answer: Maybe not, Ninja vs. Ninja is likely a skip if you enjoy Action movies.
It features a runtime of 0 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to general audiences.
Last updated: January 16, 2026
Released in the dynamic cinematic landscape of 1987, Ninja vs. Ninja emerges as a significant entry in the Action domain. The narrative core of the film focuses on a sophisticated exploration of Wicked ninja drug lords do their darnedest to prevent a scientist from making public his newly developed cure for heroin addiction. Unlike standard genre fare, Ninja vs. Ninja attempts to deconstruct traditional tropes, offering a conventional take on its central themes.
The screenplay, appearing to prioritize narrative momentum and immediate impact, sets a stage where the stakes feel personal yet universal. Under the directorial eye of Hong-Ming Ho, every scene is crafted to contribute to the atmospheric weight of the story.
The success of any Action is often anchored by its ensemble, and Ninja vs. Ninja features a noteworthy lineup led by Eric Neff . Supported by the likes of Pedro Ernyes and Louis Roth, the performances bring a palpable realism to the scripted words.
Performance Analysis: While the cast delivers competent and professional performances, they are occasionally hampered by a script that leans into familiar archetypes. However, their sheer charisma keeps the audience invested. In the broader context of 1987 cinema, these performances stand as a testament to the evolving standards of acting.
From a technical perspective, Ninja vs. Ninja is a marvel of 21st-century filmmaking. The cinematography, utilizing a moody and atmospheric color palette, significantly enhances the world-building aspects of the production.
Technical Excellence: The production design and visual effects provide a solid foundation for the story, ensuring that the world of the film feels lived-in and authentic. Furthermore, the sonic landscape adds a layer of subtextual narrative that rewards attentive viewers.
The structure of Ninja vs. Ninja follows a sophisticated brisk pace. Over its N/A minute duration, the film manages to balance exposition with action in a way that remains consistently entertaining.
Critically, the editing choices help maintain a narrative tension that rarely wavers. The sharp, concise editing ensures that not a single frame is wasted, making the film ideal for a modern audience.
Beyond its immediate entertainment value, Ninja vs. Ninja resonates with contemporary social and cultural themes prevalent in the Action landscape of 2026. It addresses concepts such as the nature of heroism and personal legacy with a level of maturity that is often missing from major releases.
In summary, our editorial assessment of Ninja vs. Ninja (1987) is overwhelmingly negative. With an audience rating of 4.3/10, it stands as a highly recommended experience for genre enthusiasts.
Set within the thematic framework of the Action genre, Ninja vs. Ninja delivers a narrative that attempts to balance character development with structural high-points.
The core plot centers around the following premise: "Wicked ninja drug lords do their darnedest to prevent a scientist from making public his newly developed cure for heroin addiction."
As the story progresses, the director focuses on building tension through fast-paced sequences, leading to a culmination that has sparked significant discussion among audience members.
The conclusion of Ninja vs. Ninja leaves several plot threads for interpretation. In the final act, the narrative shifts from exposition to a more complex resolution that ties together the various character arcs introduced earlier.
Ultimately, Ninja vs. Ninja's ending serves as a definitive close to this chapter, though the logic used provides enough ambiguity to keep fans debating its true meaning long after the credits roll.








Analyzing the audience sentiment, IMDb rating of 4.3/10, and global collection metrics, Ninja vs. Ninja stands as a challenging project for the creators. It remains an essential piece of the 1987 cinematic year.
Ninja vs. Ninja is considered a flop based on audience ratings of 4.3/10 and lower collections.
Based on the low rating of 4.3/10, Ninja vs. Ninja may not be worth watching unless you are a die-hard fan.
Ninja vs. Ninja may be available for rent or purchase on digital platforms like Apple TV, Google Play, or Amazon Prime Video. Specific streaming availability can vary by country.
Even by cut-and-paste ninja movie standards this movie is particularly inept. Apparently all the old footage came from one film, but it’s so chopped up it feels like it’s coming from multiple different cop movies. The title should be CIA vs Ninja with the confusing plot around CIA operatives they try to jam in on top of this thing to connect the no budget cop movie with the ninja stuff. It’s not even an IFD or Filmark production so the ninjas aren’t even colourful, and the dub is lame as hell although there is some amusement in how a lot of the dialogue seems to have been made up on the spot by the approximately 2 guys doing all the voices. Quite the mess, and I feel particularly cheated as Chiang Tao (one of my favourites!) shows up part way through as a bad guy gang leader only to completely disappear for the rest of the film. My suspicion is that he was only around for some sort of opening action sequence in the original, which would be fine, but in Ninja vs. Ninja we don’t get any hint as to what happened to him. Lame.