Richard III
Performance & Direction: Richard III Review
Last updated: February 18, 2026
Quick Verdict: Hit or Flop?
Is Richard III (1995) worth watching? According to our cinematic analysis, the film stands as a HIT with a verified audience rating of 6.7/10. Whether you're looking for the box office collection, ending explained, or parents guide, our review covers everything you need to know about this Drama.
Cast Performances: A Masterclass
The success of any Drama is often anchored by its ensemble, and Richard III features a noteworthy lineup led by Ian McKellen . Supported by the likes of Annette Bening and Jim Broadbent , the performances bring a palpable realism to the scripted words.
Performance Analysis: While the cast delivers competent and professional performances, they are occasionally hampered by a script that leans into familiar archetypes.
Final Verdict: Is it Worth Watching?
Story & Plot Summary: Richard III
Quick Plot Summary: Released in 1995, Richard III is a Drama, War film directed by Richard Loncraine. The narrative explores complex human emotions and relationships through detailed character development. This summary provides a scannable look at the movie's central conflict involving Ian McKellen.
Ending Explained: Richard III
Ending Breakdown: Directed by Richard Loncraine, Richard III concludes its story with a mix of closure and open interpretation. The finale presents its approach to drama resolution.
The emotional climax centers on character transformation involving Ian McKellen, offering viewers material for post-viewing discussion.
Ending Analysis:
- Narrative Resolution: The story concludes by addressing its primary narrative threads, providing closure while maintaining some ambiguity.
- Character Arcs: Character journeys reach their narrative endpoints, reflecting the film's thematic priorities.
- Thematic Payoff: The ending reinforces the drama themes established throughout the runtime.
The final moments of Richard III reflect the filmmakers' creative choices, offering an ending that aligns with the film's tone and style.
Richard III Real vs. Reel: Is it Based on a True Story?
Richard III uses real-world events as narrative inspiration. As a drama, war film directed by Richard Loncraine, it navigates the space between factual accuracy and narrative engagement for Ian McKellen's character.
Historical Context
The film takes creative liberties to enhance dramatic impact. Core events maintain connection to source material while adapting for theatrical presentation.
Creative interpretation shapes the final narrative, with attention to period detail and historical context.
Accuracy Assessment: Richard III adapts its source material for dramatic purposes. The film prioritizes thematic resonance over documentary precision.
Who Should Watch Richard III?
Worth Watching If You:
- Enjoy Drama films and don't mind familiar tropes
- Are a fan of Ian McKellen or the director
- Want a character-driven story with emotional moments
Box Office Collection: Richard III
| Metric / Region | Collection (Approx) |
|---|---|
| Worldwide Gross | $2.7M |
| Trade Verdict | CLEAN HIT |
Top Cast: Richard III
All Cast & Crew →











Where to Watch Richard III Online?
Streaming Hub📺 Stream on
fuboTV
MGM+ Amazon Channel
MGM Plus Roku Premium Channel
MGM Plus
Philo🎟️ Rent on
Fandango At Home🏷️ Buy on
Fandango At HomeRichard III Parents Guide & Age Rating
1995 AdvisoryWondering about Richard III age rating or if it's safe for kids? Here is our cinematic advisory:
⏱️ Runtime & Duration
The total runtime of Richard III is 104 minutes (1h 44m). Ensuring you have enough time for the full cinematic experience.
Verdict Summary
Analyzing the overall audience sentiment, verified rating of 6.7/10, and global performance metrics, Richard III is classified as a HIT. It remains an essential part of the 1995 cinematic calendar.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Richard III worth watching?
Richard III is definitely worth watching if you enjoy Drama movies. It has a verified rating of 6.7/10 and stands as a HIT in our box office analysis.
Where can I find Richard III parents guide and age rating?
The official parents guide for Richard III identifies it as R. Our detailed advisory section above covers all content warnings for families.
What is the total runtime of Richard III?
The total duration of Richard III is 104 minutes, which is approximately 1h 44m long.
Best Movies to Watch if you liked Richard III
How Richard III Compares & Where it Ranks
Critic Reviews for Richard III
Co-writers Ian McKellen and Richard Loncraine (who also directs) set their Richard III in 1930s Britain, and make the infamous hunchback a fascist warmonger plotting to usurp the throne. Today's English monarchy is, at best, nominal, but even way back in the 1930s there wasn't much to be gained by usurping it. Then again, the film takes place in an alternate reality where the War of the Roses occurs 450 years after the true historical conflict did. I don’t mind so much that royalty has endured those four centuries and a half; what does bother me is that language has not evolved in the interim at the same rate as, say, warfare. Why on Earth would Richard (McKellen), who is neither dumb nor crazy, use the expression “my kingdom for a horse” when he could be asking for a tank instead? This line is only in the movie because it’s in the play – but then, a great many things that are in the play aren’t in the film, and viceversa, so why keep this particular bit? I mean, it couldn’t be because the audience is expecting it, even though it makes zero sense given the circumstances, could it? Did they think diehard Shakespeare fans would riot otherwise? Well, if there were such a thing as hardcore Shake-heads, I assure you they would have rioted long before this point. Similarly outdated is a scene in which several characters who have been at each other’s throats are compelled to swear mutual oaths of loyalty. As Al Pacino’s superb documentary Looking for Richard rightly points out, at the time that the original play is set this would be serious business, because only people who want to go to hell would swear an oath and not keep it. Ditto the scene where Richard blames his deformity on Queen Elizabeth's witchcraft; this is an accusation that would have been given credence in the 1470s, but not so much in the 1930s. All things considered, it’s somewhat ironic that McKellen had a hand in the script, because his performance is worthy of much better material. His body language, in particular, is priceless – this Richard looks like a super-intelligent ape masquerading as a British Army field marshal. And when he breaks the fourth wall – another device that works better on a theater stage –, it feels as if Richard is letting the viewers in on that the entire movie is a sick joke he's playing on the other characters. If only.
movieMx Verified
This review has been verified for accuracy and editorial quality by our senior cinematic analysts.
This analysis is compiled by our editorial experts using multi-source verification and audience sentiment data for maximum accuracy.










