Is Roland Garros Worth Watching?
Answer: Maybe not, Roland Garros is likely a skip if you enjoy Documentary movies.
It features a runtime of 89 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to general audiences.
Verdict:Roland Garros is a confirmed FLOP based on our analysis of audience ratings and box office momentum.
With a rating of 0.0/10, it has delivered a mixed experience for fans of the Documentary, Drama genre.
Answer: Maybe not, Roland Garros is likely a skip if you enjoy Documentary movies.
It features a runtime of 89 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to general audiences.
Last updated: January 12, 2026
Released in 2014, Roland Garros enters the Documentary genre with a narrative focused on From the shacks and dirt sheets of Argentina to Center Court of Roland Garros. Under the direction of Milos Twilight, the film attempts to weave detailed character arcs with visual storytelling.
The film is anchored by performances from Roger Federer. While the cast delivers competent performances, the script occasionally limits their range.
From a technical standpoint, Roland Garros offers a competent presentation. The cinematography uses a distinct visual palette that aligns well with the tone. The sharp editing keeps the narrative moving at a brisk pace, maximizing the impact of the key sequences.
Beyond the narrative, Roland Garros resonates with current cultural themes in the Documentary space. It stays within the established boundaries of its genre, providing exactly what core fans expect without reinventing the wheel.
As of early 2026, Roland Garros is available in theaters worldwide. For audiences in the US, UK, and India, digital rentals are typically available on platforms like Amazon Prime and Apple TV roughly 45-60 days after the theatrical release.
The plot of Roland Garros centers on a unique premise within the Documentary landscape. From the shacks and dirt sheets of Argentina to Center Court of Roland Garros. The second act serves as a major turning point, leading to a climax that fans of 2014 cinema will find fairly predictable.
The ending of Roland Garros has sparked significant debate on social media. It signifies the ambiguous resolution of the main plot thread. Given the current box office momentum, discussions of a Roland Garros sequel or a wider cinematic universe are already gaining traction.
Final verdict for Roland Garros (2014): with an audience rating of 0/10, the reception has been negative. It is a recommended for fans of Documentary, Drama cinema who appreciate attention to detail.
Analyzing the audience sentiment, IMDb rating of 0/10, and global collection metrics, Roland Garros stands as a challenging project for the creators. It remains an essential piece of the 2014 cinematic year.
Roland Garros is considered a flop based on audience ratings of 0/10 and lower collections.
Based on the low rating of 0/10, Roland Garros may not be worth watching unless you are a die-hard fan.
Roland Garros may be available for rent or purchase on digital platforms like Apple TV, Google Play, or Amazon Prime Video. Specific streaming availability can vary by country.
Roland Garros is considered a flop based on audience ratings of 0/10 and lower collections.
Based on the low rating of 0/10, Roland Garros may not be worth watching unless you are a die-hard fan.
Roland Garros may be available for rent or purchase on digital platforms like Apple TV, Google Play, or Amazon Prime Video. Specific streaming availability can vary by country.
Roland Garros is a Documentary, Drama movie that follows: From the shacks and dirt sheets of Argentina to Center Court of Roland Garros....
Roland Garros is classified as Documentary, Drama. We recommend checking the official age rating before watching with children.
Roland Garros is primarily available in its original language, with subtitles and dubbed versions available on various streaming services and digital stores.
From the shacks and dirt sheets of Argentina to Center Court of Roland Garros.
No reviews found for this filter.