Verdict:Rudyard Kipling's Mark of the Beast is a confirmed FLOP based on our analysis of audience ratings and box office momentum.
With a rating of 0.0/10, it has delivered a mixed experience for fans of the Horror genre.
Answer: Maybe not, Rudyard Kipling's Mark of the Beast is likely a skip if you enjoy Horror movies.
It features a runtime of 75 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to mature audiences.
Last updated: January 12, 2026
Released in 2012, Rudyard Kipling's Mark of the Beast enters the Horror genre with a narrative focused on A modern film adaptation of Rudyard Kipling's original short story. Under the direction of Thomas Edward Seymour, the film attempts to weave detailed character arcs with visual storytelling.
The film is anchored by performances from Debbie Rochon. While the cast delivers competent performances, the script occasionally limits their range.
From a technical standpoint, Rudyard Kipling's Mark of the Beast offers a competent presentation. The cinematography uses a distinct visual palette that aligns well with the tone. The sharp editing keeps the narrative moving at a brisk pace, maximizing the impact of the key sequences.
Beyond the narrative, Rudyard Kipling's Mark of the Beast resonates with current cultural themes in the Horror space. It stays within the established boundaries of its genre, providing exactly what core fans expect without reinventing the wheel.
As of early 2026, Rudyard Kipling's Mark of the Beast is available in theaters worldwide. For audiences in the US, UK, and India, digital rentals are typically available on platforms like YouTube roughly 45-60 days after the theatrical release.
The plot of Rudyard Kipling's Mark of the Beast centers on a unique premise within the Horror landscape. A modern film adaptation of Rudyard Kipling's original short story. The second act serves as a major turning point, leading to a climax that fans of 2012 cinema will find fairly predictable.
The ending of Rudyard Kipling's Mark of the Beast has sparked significant debate on social media. It signifies the ambiguous resolution of the main plot thread. Given the current box office momentum, discussions of a Rudyard Kipling's Mark of the Beast sequel or a wider cinematic universe are already gaining traction.
Final verdict for Rudyard Kipling's Mark of the Beast (2012): with an audience rating of 0/10, the reception has been negative. It is a recommended for fans of Horror cinema who appreciate attention to detail.
YouTubeYouTubeAnalyzing the audience sentiment, IMDb rating of 0/10, and global collection metrics, Rudyard Kipling's Mark of the Beast stands as a challenging project for the creators. It remains an essential piece of the 2012 cinematic year.
Rudyard Kipling's Mark of the Beast is considered a flop based on audience ratings of 0/10 and lower collections.
Based on the low rating of 0/10, Rudyard Kipling's Mark of the Beast may not be worth watching unless you are a die-hard fan.
Rudyard Kipling's Mark of the Beast may be available for rent or purchase on digital platforms like Apple TV, Google Play, or Amazon Prime Video. Specific streaming availability can vary by country.
Rudyard Kipling's Mark of the Beast is considered a flop based on audience ratings of 0/10 and lower collections.
Based on the low rating of 0/10, Rudyard Kipling's Mark of the Beast may not be worth watching unless you are a die-hard fan.
Rudyard Kipling's Mark of the Beast may be available for rent or purchase on digital platforms like Apple TV, Google Play, or Amazon Prime Video. Specific streaming availability can vary by country.
Rudyard Kipling's Mark of the Beast is a Horror movie that follows: A modern film adaptation of Rudyard Kipling's original short story....
Rudyard Kipling's Mark of the Beast falls under Horror, which often contain intense scenes. Parental discretion is advised.
Rudyard Kipling's Mark of the Beast is primarily available in its original language, with subtitles and dubbed versions available on various streaming services and digital stores.
A modern film adaptation of Rudyard Kipling's original short story.
No reviews found for this filter.
