Performance & Direction: Run, Cougar, Run Review
Last updated: February 15, 2026
Quick Verdict: Hit or Flop?
Is Run, Cougar, Run (1972) worth watching? According to our cinematic analysis, the film stands as a ABOVE AVERAGE with a verified audience rating of 5.8/10. Whether you're looking for the box office collection, ending explained, or parents guide, our review covers everything you need to know about this Western.
Cast Performances: A Masterclass
The success of any Western is often anchored by its ensemble, and Run, Cougar, Run features a noteworthy lineup led by Stuart Whitman . Supported by the likes of Frank Aletter and Lonny Chapman , the performances bring a palpable realism to the scripted words.
Performance Analysis: While the cast delivers competent and professional performances, they are occasionally hampered by a script that leans into familiar archetypes.
Final Verdict: Is it Worth Watching?
Story & Plot Summary: Run, Cougar, Run
Quick Plot Summary: Released in 1972, Run, Cougar, Run is a Western, Family, Drama film directed by Jerome Courtland. The narrative presents a compelling narrative that engages viewers from start to finish. This summary provides a scannable look at the movie's central conflict involving Stuart Whitman.
Ending Explained: Run, Cougar, Run
Ending Breakdown: Directed by Jerome Courtland, Run, Cougar, Run attempts to tie together its various plot elements. The finale presents its approach to western resolution.
The emotional climax centers on character transformation involving Stuart Whitman, offering viewers material for post-viewing discussion.
Ending Analysis:
- Narrative Resolution: The story concludes by addressing its primary narrative threads, providing closure while maintaining some ambiguity.
- Character Arcs: Character journeys reach their narrative endpoints, reflecting the film's thematic priorities.
- Thematic Payoff: The ending reinforces the western themes established throughout the runtime.
The final moments of Run, Cougar, Run reflect the filmmakers' creative choices, offering an ending that aligns with the film's tone and style.
Who Should Watch Run, Cougar, Run?
Consider Watching If:
- You're a completist for Western films
- You're curious despite mixed reviews
- You have low expectations and want casual entertainment
Top Cast: Run, Cougar, Run
All Cast & Crew →
Run, Cougar, Run Parents Guide & Age Rating
1972 AdvisoryWondering about Run, Cougar, Run age rating or if it's safe for kids? Here is our cinematic advisory:
⏱️ Runtime & Duration
The total runtime of Run, Cougar, Run is 87 minutes (1h 27m). Ensuring you have enough time for the full cinematic experience.
Verdict Summary
Analyzing the overall audience sentiment, verified rating of 5.8/10, and global performance metrics, Run, Cougar, Run is classified as a ABOVE AVERAGE. It remains an essential part of the 1972 cinematic calendar.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Run, Cougar, Run worth watching?
Run, Cougar, Run is definitely worth watching if you enjoy Western movies. It has a verified rating of 5.8/10 and stands as a ABOVE AVERAGE in our box office analysis.
Where can I find Run, Cougar, Run parents guide and age rating?
The official parents guide for Run, Cougar, Run identifies it as G. Our detailed advisory section above covers all content warnings for families.
What is the total runtime of Run, Cougar, Run?
The total duration of Run, Cougar, Run is 87 minutes, which is approximately 1h 27m long.
Best Movies to Watch if you liked Run, Cougar, Run
How Run, Cougar, Run Compares & Where it Ranks
Critic Reviews for Run, Cougar, Run
One of Disney's better manufactured nature films, though 'Run, Cougar, Run' still has a lot of the same issues. I could probably copy and paste my review from their other films of this type and it would still suit. The main problem I have with these productions is that they lack true backbone, most of the time it's the obvious bad human, good animal plot which is too predictable; it's also difficult to connect to, of course we want the animal to 'win' but there's no other real reason to care. As noted at the top, it is one of the more improved ones. There's more to the cast for one, which is unusual. Alfonso Arau is charming as Etio, he's the only real good guy here; alongside Joe (Douglas Fowley), perhaps. The animals are (seemingly - still arguable I guess) more looked after too, which isn't always the case with these films. Despite that and Arau, this isn't a film that I found entertaining; though they've done worse.
movieMx Verified
This review has been verified for accuracy and editorial quality by our senior cinematic analysts.
This analysis is compiled by our editorial experts using multi-source verification and audience sentiment data for maximum accuracy.
