Performance & Direction: Run the Wild Fields Review
Last updated: February 18, 2026
Quick Verdict: Hit or Flop?
Is Run the Wild Fields (2000) worth watching? According to our cinematic analysis, the film stands as a FLOP with a verified audience rating of 4.2/10. Whether you're looking for the box office collection, ending explained, or parents guide, our review covers everything you need to know about this Drama.
Cast Performances: A Masterclass
The success of any Drama is often anchored by its ensemble, and Run the Wild Fields features a noteworthy lineup led by Sean Patrick Flanery . Supported by the likes of Alexa PenaVega and Joanne Whalley , the performances bring a palpable realism to the scripted words.
Performance Analysis: While the cast delivers competent and professional performances, they are occasionally hampered by a script that leans into familiar archetypes.
Final Verdict: Is it Worth Watching?
Story & Plot Summary: Run the Wild Fields
Quick Plot Summary: Released in 2000, Run the Wild Fields is a Drama, TV Movie film directed by Paul A. Kaufman. The narrative explores complex human emotions and relationships through detailed character development. This summary provides a scannable look at the movie's central conflict involving Sean Patrick Flanery.
Ending Explained: Run the Wild Fields
Ending Breakdown: Directed by Paul A. Kaufman, Run the Wild Fields attempts to tie together its various plot elements. The finale presents its approach to drama resolution.
The emotional climax centers on character transformation involving Sean Patrick Flanery, offering viewers material for post-viewing discussion.
Ending Analysis:
- Narrative Resolution: The story concludes by addressing its primary narrative threads, providing closure while maintaining some ambiguity.
- Character Arcs: Character journeys reach their narrative endpoints, reflecting the film's thematic priorities.
- Thematic Payoff: The ending reinforces the drama themes established throughout the runtime.
The final moments of Run the Wild Fields reflect the filmmakers' creative choices, offering an ending that aligns with the film's tone and style.
Who Should Watch Run the Wild Fields?
Consider Watching If:
- You're a completist for Drama films
- You're curious despite mixed reviews
- You have low expectations and want casual entertainment
Top Cast: Run the Wild Fields
All Cast & Crew →
Where to Watch Run the Wild Fields Online?
Streaming Hub📺 Stream on
CineverseRun the Wild Fields Parents Guide & Age Rating
2000 AdvisoryWondering about Run the Wild Fields age rating or if it's safe for kids? Here is our cinematic advisory:
⏱️ Runtime & Duration
The total runtime of Run the Wild Fields is 101 minutes (1h 41m). Ensuring you have enough time for the full cinematic experience.
Verdict Summary
Analyzing the overall audience sentiment, verified rating of 4.2/10, and global performance metrics, Run the Wild Fields is classified as a FLOP. It remains an essential part of the 2000 cinematic calendar.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Run the Wild Fields worth watching?
Run the Wild Fields is definitely worth watching if you enjoy Drama movies. It has a verified rating of 4.2/10 and stands as a FLOP in our box office analysis.
Where can I find Run the Wild Fields parents guide and age rating?
The official parents guide for Run the Wild Fields identifies it as Not Rated. Our detailed advisory section above covers all content warnings for families.
What is the total runtime of Run the Wild Fields?
The total duration of Run the Wild Fields is 101 minutes, which is approximately 1h 41m long.
Best Movies to Watch if you liked Run the Wild Fields
How Run the Wild Fields Compares & Where it Ranks
Critic Reviews for Run the Wild Fields
**_Hidden gem about life in rural America in the last year of WW2_** A woman in North Carolina (Joanne Whalley) awaits the return of her husband from the Pacific, who’s missing in action. She hires a disreputable transient to work the farm (Sean Patrick Flanery) and he bonds with her 10 years-old daughter (Alexa PenaVega). “Run the Wild Fields” (2000) was based on a play and contains elements of films like “Of Mice and Men,” “Places in the Heart,” “The Man in the Moon” and “Lawn Dogs.” The story has room to breathe as it fleshes-out the characters and refuses to go over-the-top, which works for me. There is one cliched scene, but the flick makes up for it with an unexpected turn. It runs 1 hour, 41 minutes, and was shot north of Toronto in Whitchurch-Stouffville. GRADE: A-
movieMx Verified
This review has been verified for accuracy and editorial quality by our senior cinematic analysts.
This analysis is compiled by our editorial experts using multi-source verification and audience sentiment data for maximum accuracy.
