Is Save and Protect Worth Watching?
Answer: Maybe not, Save and Protect is likely a skip if you enjoy Drama movies.
It features a runtime of 168 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to general audiences.
Verdict:Save and Protect is a confirmed FLOP based on our analysis of audience ratings and box office momentum.
With a rating of 4.8/10, it has delivered a mixed experience for fans of the Drama genre.
Answer: Maybe not, Save and Protect is likely a skip if you enjoy Drama movies.
It features a runtime of 168 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to general audiences.
Last updated: January 13, 2026
Released in the dynamic cinematic landscape of 1990, Save and Protect emerges as a significant entry in the Drama domain. The narrative core of the film focuses on a sophisticated exploration of Inspired by Flaubert’s Madame Bovary, Sokurov’s Save and Protect recalls the most crucial events of Emma’s decline and fall: affairs with the aristocratic Rodolphe and the student Leon, the humiliation that follows her husband’s botching of the operation on the stable boy’s clubfoot. Unlike standard genre fare, Save and Protect attempts to deconstruct traditional tropes, offering a conventional take on its central themes.
The screenplay, appearing to prioritize narrative momentum and immediate impact, sets a stage where the stakes feel personal yet universal. Under the directorial eye of Aleksandr Sokurov, every scene is crafted to contribute to the atmospheric weight of the story, ensuring that the Drama elements serve the larger narrative arc rather than just providing spectacle.
The success of any Drama is often anchored by its ensemble, and Save and Protect features a noteworthy lineup led by Cécile Zervudacki. Supported by the likes of Robert Vaab and Aleksandr Cherednik, the performances bring a palpable realism to the scripted words.
Performance Analysis: While the cast delivers competent and professional performances, they are occasionally hampered by a script that leans into familiar archetypes. However, the sheer charisma of Cécile Zervudacki, Robert Vaab, Aleksandr Cherednik manages to keep the audience invested through the film's more predictable sequences. In the broader context of 1990 cinema, these performances stand as a testament to the evolving standards of acting within the Drama space.
From a technical perspective, Save and Protect is a marvel of 21st-century filmmaking. The cinematography, utilizing a moody and atmospheric color palette, significantly enhances the world-building aspects of the production. Each frame seems calculated to guide the viewer's emotional response, whether through wide, sweeping vistas or tight, claustrophobic close-ups that emphasize character isolation.
Technical Excellence: The production design and visual effects provide a solid foundation for the story, ensuring that the world of the film feels lived-in and authentic, even when the narrative logic falters. Furthermore, the sonic landscape—comprising both the score and sound design—adds a layer of subtextual narrative that rewards attentive viewers.
The structure of Save and Protect follows a sophisticated deliberate pace. Over its 168 minute duration, the film manages to balance exposition with action in a way that remains consistently entertaining. The second act, often the most difficult to manage, serves here as a crucible for character growth, leading toward a climax that feels both inevitable and surprising.
Critically, the editing choices by the team help maintain a narrative tension that rarely wavers. While some may find the extended runtime testing, the investment pays off for audiences who appreciate a narrative that isn`t afraid to breathe and explore its more nuanced corners.
Beyond its immediate entertainment value, Save and Protect resonates with contemporary social and cultural themes prevalent in the Drama landscape of 2026. It addresses concepts such as the nature of heroism and personal legacy with a level of maturity that is often missing from major releases.
This cultural relevance is likely why it has garnered a 4.8/10 rating on our platform. Films like this bridge the gap between niche interest and global appeal, proving that stories rooted in specific human experiences can find a home with audiences worldwide, from the US and UK to India and beyond.
Analyzing the plot deeper, Save and Protect is more than just its synopsis. It is an inquiry into the complexity of relationships. Inspired by Flaubert’s Madame Bovary, Sokurov’s Save and Protect recalls the most crucial events of Emma’s decline and fall: affairs with the aristocratic Rodolphe and the student Leon, the humiliation that follows her husband’s botching of the operation on the stable boy’s clubfoot. The universality of the theme of eternal struggle between the soul and the flesh is conveyed through the absence of specific reference to time or place: although the film seems to begin in 1840, its surreal mode effortlessly accommodates an automobile and the strains of “When the Saints Go Marching In” on an off-screen radio. Focusing on passion from a woman’s perspective and downplaying plot, Sokurov explores his subject in exquisite detail, capturing not only the heat of passion but also the quiet moments before and after and the innocent sensuousness of the body.
The philosophical underpinnings of the third act suggest a worldview that is standard for its genre yet executed with high professional polish. This is not just a commercial product; it is a piece of art that invites discussion long after the credits have finished rolling.
In summary, our editorial assessment of Save and Protect (1990) is overwhelmingly negative. With an audience rating of 4.8/10 and strong performance metrics in the Drama categories, it stands as a highly recommended experience for genre enthusiasts.
Whether you choose to experience it for the stellar performances from Cécile Zervudacki, Robert Vaab, Aleksandr Cherednik or the visual majesty of its technical execution, Save and Protect is a significant contribution to the cinema of 1990. It represents the kind of filmmaking that movieMx is proud to champion—original, bold, and ultimately, deeply human.
Analyzing the audience sentiment, IMDb rating of 4.8/10, and global collection metrics, Save and Protect stands as a challenging project for the creators. It remains an essential piece of the 1990 cinematic year.
Save and Protect is considered a flop based on audience ratings of 4.8/10 and lower collections.
Based on the low rating of 4.8/10, Save and Protect may not be worth watching unless you are a die-hard fan.
Save and Protect may be available for rent or purchase on digital platforms like Apple TV, Google Play, or Amazon Prime Video. Specific streaming availability can vary by country.
Inspired by Flaubert’s Madame Bovary, Sokurov’s Save and Protect recalls the most crucial events of Emma’s decline and fall: affairs with the aristocratic Rodolphe and the student Leon, the humiliation that follows her husband’s botching of the operation on the stable boy’s clubfoot. The universality of the theme of eternal struggle between the soul and the flesh is conveyed through the absence of specific reference to time or place: although the film seems to begin in 1840, its surreal mode effortlessly accommodates an automobile and the strains of “When the Saints Go Marching In” on an off-screen radio. Focusing on passion from a woman’s perspective and downplaying plot, Sokurov explores his subject in exquisite detail, capturing not only the heat of passion but also the quiet moments before and after and the innocent sensuousness of the body.