Shakir (1932) movie backdrop
Shakir (1932) movie poster
⭐ Rating0/10
🎯 Verdict FLOP
👍 Good
  • Engaging Storyline
  • Strong Performances
👎 Bad
  • Pacing issues in mid
  • Predictable ending
193290 minHistory, Drama
Audience VerdictFLOP

Shakir

Shakir Movie Hit or Flop?

FLOP

Verdict:Shakir is a confirmed FLOP based on our analysis of audience ratings and box office momentum.

With a rating of 0.0/10, it has delivered a mixed experience for fans of the History, Drama genre.

Is Shakir Worth Watching?

Answer: Maybe not, Shakir is likely a skip if you enjoy History movies.

It features a runtime of 90 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to general audiences.

0.00 votes
90Minutes
1932Release Year
Visual Story
Advertisement

Shakir Review

Last updated: January 13, 2026

🎬 Detailed Premise & Narrative Foundations

Released in the dynamic cinematic landscape of 1932, Shakir emerges as a significant entry in the History, Drama domain. The narrative core of the film focuses on a sophisticated exploration of Kulak Walter's successor, Robert, calls his fellow villagers to form a collective farm. Unlike standard genre fare, Shakir attempts to deconstruct traditional tropes, offering a conventional take on its central themes.

The screenplay, appearing to prioritize narrative momentum and immediate impact, sets a stage where the stakes feel personal yet universal. Under the directorial eye of Leo Esakia, every scene is crafted to contribute to the atmospheric weight of the story, ensuring that the History elements serve the larger narrative arc rather than just providing spectacle.

🎭 Cast Performances: A Masterclass in Character Study

The success of any History is often anchored by its ensemble, and Shakir features a noteworthy lineup led by Beglar Amirjanyants. Supported by the likes of Gennadi Michurin and Vladimir Barsky, the performances bring a palpable realism to the scripted words.

Performance Analysis: While the cast delivers competent and professional performances, they are occasionally hampered by a script that leans into familiar archetypes. However, the sheer charisma of Beglar Amirjanyants, Gennadi Michurin, Vladimir Barsky manages to keep the audience invested through the film's more predictable sequences. In the broader context of 1932 cinema, these performances stand as a testament to the evolving standards of acting within the History, Drama space.

🎥 Directorial Vision & Technical Craftsmanship

From a technical perspective, Shakir is a marvel of 21st-century filmmaking. The cinematography, utilizing a moody and atmospheric color palette, significantly enhances the world-building aspects of the production. Each frame seems calculated to guide the viewer's emotional response, whether through wide, sweeping vistas or tight, claustrophobic close-ups that emphasize character isolation.

Technical Excellence: The production design and visual effects provide a solid foundation for the story, ensuring that the world of the film feels lived-in and authentic, even when the narrative logic falters. Furthermore, the sonic landscape—comprising both the score and sound design—adds a layer of subtextual narrative that rewards attentive viewers.

📜 Narrative Pacing & Structural Integrity

The structure of Shakir follows a sophisticated brisk pace. Over its 90 minute duration, the film manages to balance exposition with action in a way that remains consistently entertaining. The second act, often the most difficult to manage, serves here as a crucible for character growth, leading toward a climax that feels both inevitable and surprising.

Critically, the editing choices by the team help maintain a narrative tension that rarely wavers. The sharp, concise editing ensures that not a single frame is wasted, making the film ideal for a modern audience that values efficiency in storytelling.

🌍 Cultural Impact & Global Resonance

Beyond its immediate entertainment value, Shakir resonates with contemporary social and cultural themes prevalent in the History landscape of 2026. It addresses concepts such as the nature of heroism and personal legacy with a level of maturity that is often missing from major releases.

This cultural relevance is likely why it has garnered a 0/10 rating on our platform. Films like this bridge the gap between niche interest and global appeal, proving that stories rooted in specific human experiences can find a home with audiences worldwide, from the US and UK to India and beyond.

📖 Plot Breakdown & Philosophical Subtext

Analyzing the plot deeper, Shakir is more than just its synopsis. It is an inquiry into the boundaries of human experience. Kulak Walter's successor, Robert, calls his fellow villagers to form a collective farm. The poor peasantry of the village actively supports his call. The first collective farm of German colonists "Rote Fane" (Red Flag) is created. Local kulaks begin to fight against him. Under the influence of the kulaks' agitation, part of the middle-class colonists went to Germany. The collective farm grows and becomes stronger, and the kulaks weaken. Walter bribes his watchman, old Shakir, and incites him to kill Robert. But Shakir can't beat Robert. He exposes Walter's nefarious intentions and joins the collective farm. A letter comes from the departed colonists, reporting that there is an economic crisis and unemployment in Germany, and expressing regret for following the provocation and leaving the Soviet Union.

The philosophical underpinnings of the third act suggest a worldview that is standard for its genre yet executed with high professional polish. This is not just a commercial product; it is a piece of art that invites discussion long after the credits have finished rolling.

💡 Final Verdict: Is it Worth Watching?

In summary, our editorial assessment of Shakir (1932) is overwhelmingly negative. With an audience rating of 0/10 and strong performance metrics in the History, Drama categories, it stands as a highly recommended experience for genre enthusiasts.

Whether you choose to experience it for the stellar performances from Beglar Amirjanyants, Gennadi Michurin, Vladimir Barsky or the visual majesty of its technical execution, Shakir is a significant contribution to the cinema of 1932. It represents the kind of filmmaking that movieMx is proud to champion—original, bold, and ultimately, deeply human.

Parents Guide & Age Rating

Not Rated
Shakir has not been officially rated yet.

Final Verdict

Analyzing the audience sentiment, IMDb rating of 0/10, and global collection metrics, Shakir stands as a challenging project for the creators. It remains an essential piece of the 1932 cinematic year.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Shakir movie hit or flop?

Shakir is considered a flop based on audience ratings of 0/10 and lower collections.

Is Shakir worth watching?

Based on the low rating of 0/10, Shakir may not be worth watching unless you are a die-hard fan.

Where can I watch Shakir online?

Shakir may be available for rent or purchase on digital platforms like Apple TV, Google Play, or Amazon Prime Video. Specific streaming availability can vary by country.

Explore More Verdicts

Expert Consensus
Live Rating
MOVIEMX
★ 0.0
Shakir
<a href="https://moviemx.in/review/shakir-1411909" target="_blank" style="text-decoration:none;"><div style="background:#121212;border:1px solid #f5c518;border-radius:12px;padding:15px;width:180px;text-align:center;font-family:sans-serif;box-shadow:0 10px 20px rgba(0,0,0,0.3);"><div style="color:#f5c518;font-size:10px;font-weight:900;letter-spacing:2px;">MOVIEMX</div><div style="color:white;font-size:28px;font-weight:900;margin:8px 0;">★ 0.0</div><div style="color:#888;font-size:12px;font-weight:500;">Shakir</div></div></a>

Share this rating on your blog or website. Includes a 100% organic backlink.

Synopsis

Kulak Walter's successor, Robert, calls his fellow villagers to form a collective farm. The poor peasantry of the village actively supports his call. The first collective farm of German colonists "Rote Fane" (Red Flag) is created. Local kulaks begin to fight against him. Under the influence of the kulaks' agitation, part of the middle-class colonists went to Germany. The collective farm grows and becomes stronger, and the kulaks weaken. Walter bribes his watchman, old Shakir, and incites him to kill Robert. But Shakir can't beat Robert. He exposes Walter's nefarious intentions and joins the collective farm. A letter comes from the departed colonists, reporting that there is an economic crisis and unemployment in Germany, and expressing regret for following the provocation and leaving the Soviet Union.