Shalako
Performance & Direction: Shalako Review
Last updated: February 25, 2026
Quick Verdict: Hit or Flop?
Is Shalako (1968) worth watching? According to our cinematic analysis, the film stands as a ABOVE AVERAGE with a verified audience rating of 5.7/10. Whether you're looking for the box office collection, ending explained, or parents guide, our review covers everything you need to know about this Western.
Cast Performances: A Masterclass
The success of any Western is often anchored by its ensemble, and Shalako features a noteworthy lineup led by Sean Connery . Supported by the likes of Brigitte Bardot and Jack Hawkins , the performances bring a palpable realism to the scripted words.
Performance Analysis: While the cast delivers competent and professional performances, they are occasionally hampered by a script that leans into familiar archetypes.
Final Verdict: Is it Worth Watching?
Story & Plot Summary: Shalako
Quick Plot Summary: Released in 1968, Shalako is a Western film directed by Edward Dmytryk. The narrative presents a compelling narrative that engages viewers from start to finish. This summary provides a scannable look at the movie's central conflict involving Sean Connery.
Ending Explained: Shalako
Ending Breakdown: Directed by Edward Dmytryk, Shalako attempts to tie together its various plot elements. The finale presents its approach to western resolution.
The conclusion addresses the core thematic questions involving Sean Connery, offering viewers material for post-viewing discussion.
Ending Analysis:
- Narrative Resolution: The story concludes by addressing its primary narrative threads, providing closure while maintaining some ambiguity.
- Character Arcs: Character journeys reach their narrative endpoints, reflecting the film's thematic priorities.
- Thematic Payoff: The ending reinforces the western themes established throughout the runtime.
The final moments of Shalako reflect the filmmakers' creative choices, offering an ending that aligns with the film's tone and style.
Who Should Watch Shalako?
Consider Watching If:
- You're a completist for Western films
- You're curious despite mixed reviews
- You have low expectations and want casual entertainment
Box Office Collection: Shalako
| Metric / Region | Collection (Approx) |
|---|---|
| Production Budget | $1.5M |
| Worldwide Gross | $2.6M |
| Trade Verdict | FINANCIAL DISAPPOINTMENT |
Shalako Budget
The estimated production budget for Shalako is $1.5M. This figure covers principal photography, talent acquisitions, and visual effects. When accounting for global marketing and distribution, the break-even point is typically 2x the base production cost.
Top Cast: Shalako
All Cast & Crew →











Where to Watch Shalako Online?
Streaming Hub🎟️ Rent on
Amazon VideoShalako Parents Guide & Age Rating
1968 AdvisoryWondering about Shalako age rating or if it's safe for kids? Here is our cinematic advisory:
⏱️ Runtime & Duration
The total runtime of Shalako is 113 minutes (1h 53m). Ensuring you have enough time for the full cinematic experience.
Verdict Summary
Analyzing the overall audience sentiment, verified rating of 5.7/10, and global performance metrics, Shalako is classified as a ABOVE AVERAGE. It remains an essential part of the 1968 cinematic calendar.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Shalako worth watching?
Shalako is definitely worth watching if you enjoy Western movies. It has a verified rating of 5.7/10 and stands as a ABOVE AVERAGE in our box office analysis.
Where can I find Shalako parents guide and age rating?
The official parents guide for Shalako identifies it as Not Rated. Our detailed advisory section above covers all content warnings for families.
What is the total runtime of Shalako?
The total duration of Shalako is 113 minutes, which is approximately 1h 53m long.
Best Movies to Watch if you liked Shalako
How Shalako Compares & Where it Ranks
Critic Reviews for Shalako
Right from the start, with a pretty awful theme song that struggles to rhyme “have a go” with “Shalako”, the writing is on the wall and it’s more graffiti than Pulitzer. A group of yesterday’s A-listers are assembled to form a hunting party traipsing the Wild West hunting at the tail end of the nineteenth century. They are led by the “Baron” (Peter Van Eyck) with the glamorous “Irina” (Brigitte Bardot), the cranky “Daggett” (Jack Hawkins) and his trophy wife (Honor Blackman) and are being guided by the duplicitous “Fulton” (a Stephen Boyd straight out of “Genghis Khan” from 1965). They need his assistance because this is Apache territory, and these folks are none too pleased that their territory is being invaded by these interlopers who dress for dinner end enjoy fine wines (courtesy of Eric Sykes) as they routinely slaughter for sport. Along the way, this unlikely group encounter the enigmatic “Shalako” (Sean Connery) who has some history with the natives which comes in handy when they attack and “Fulton” promptly skedaddles with their escort, their transport and most of their supplies. Now, a war of attrition ensues that puts the party at risk and, of course, encourages them all to expose their dirty linen and give each of these fairly insipid characters a few moments in the sun - and that’s where the whole thing just becomes a mess. Hawkins and Van Eyck are, frankly, dreadful and though Blackman tries to keep her tongue in her cheek, Bardot ought just to have stayed with her donkeys and Connery, well he really can’t seem to make head nor tail of his persona as this over-written and lacklustre drama lurches along to it’s fairly predictable conclusion. Quite why anyone agreed to produce this is anyone’s guess, but the end product has little to redeem it.
movieMx Verified
This review has been verified for accuracy and editorial quality by our senior cinematic analysts.
This analysis is compiled by our editorial experts using multi-source verification and audience sentiment data for maximum accuracy.










