Is Souls at Sea Worth Watching?
Answer: Yes, Souls at Sea is definitely worth watching if you enjoy Adventure movies.
It features a runtime of 92 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to general audiences.

Verdict:Souls at Sea is a confirmed FLOP based on our analysis of audience ratings and box office momentum.
With a rating of 6.3/10, it has delivered a mixed experience for fans of the Adventure genre.
Answer: Yes, Souls at Sea is definitely worth watching if you enjoy Adventure movies.
It features a runtime of 92 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to general audiences.
Last updated: January 10, 2026
Released in 1937, Souls at Sea enters the Adventure genre with a narrative focused on Michael 'Nuggin' Taylor and Powdah save lives during a sea tragedy in this story about the slave trade on the high seas during 1842. Under the direction of Henry Hathaway, the film attempts to weave detailed character arcs with visual storytelling.
The film is anchored by performances from Gary Cooper, George Raft, Frances Dee. While the cast delivers competent performances, the script occasionally limits their range.
From a technical standpoint, Souls at Sea offers a competent presentation. The cinematography aligns well with the tone, keeping the narrative moving at a brisk pace.
As of January 2026, Souls at Sea is available in theaters worldwide. For streaming audiences in the US and UK, look for availability on major platforms roughly 45 days after the theatrical release. Check your local listings for specific showtimes.
With an audience rating of 6.3/10, the reception has been divisive. For fans of Adventure, it serves as a worthy addition to the watchlist.










Analyzing the audience sentiment, IMDb rating of 6.3/10, and global collection metrics, Souls at Sea stands as a challenging project for the creators. It remains an essential piece of the 1937 cinematic year.
Souls at Sea has received mixed reviews with a 6.3/10 rating, making it a moderate success with the audience.
Souls at Sea is a mixed bag. It might be worth watching if you're a fan of Adventure movies, but read reviews first.
Souls at Sea is a Adventure movie that Michael 'Nuggin' Taylor and Powdah save lives during a sea tragedy in this story about the slave trade on the high seas during 1842....
I never really found Gary Cooper to be the most invigorating of actors, but he delivers well here in this tale of maritime treachery. We start at a trial where he ("Nuggin") is being indicted for the killing of survivors from a seaborne disaster in the mid 1800s. It's while the evidence is being given that we are taken back on a retrospective of just how this honourable seaman found himself caught up, with his friend "Powdah" (George Raft) in the evil machinations of "Tarryton" (Henry Wilcoxon). When the boat he was travelling on manages to hit an iceberg, he is left to take charge. As usual there aren't enough spaces on the life boats so panic ensues, and a fairly "survival of the fittest" one at that, the results of which result in his current predicament. How to prove his innocence? Well that might lie in the hands of "Woodley" (George Zucco) who is working for the British Government on a mission to finally eradicate slavery, and who knows a thing or two about the real character of "Nuggin". It's a tautly directed adventure for the first half with plenty of duplicity going on, but when his relationship with "Margaret" (Frances Dee) starts to take a more prominent role in the story, we head into a rather disappointing form of 1930s soapdom. Raft tries his best and in many ways reminded me of Robert Newton but his loyal and decent character is sadly underused whilst the more interesting and perilous anti-slavery storyline becomes a little too subsumed amidst the lace and umbrellas. It's still a film that's well paced for the most part and one that makes you realise that the abolition of slavery in itself didn't actually halt this odious practice in the United States. There were still plenty of officials complicit in this lucrative activity.