Strictly Ballroom
Performance & Direction: Strictly Ballroom Review
Last updated: February 21, 2026
Quick Verdict: Hit or Flop?
Is Strictly Ballroom (1992) worth watching? According to our cinematic analysis, the film stands as a HIT with a verified audience rating of 6.6/10. Whether you're looking for the box office collection, ending explained, or parents guide, our review covers everything you need to know about this Comedy.
Cast Performances: A Masterclass
The success of any Comedy is often anchored by its ensemble, and Strictly Ballroom features a noteworthy lineup led by Paul Mercurio . Supported by the likes of Tara Morice and Bill Hunter , the performances bring a palpable realism to the scripted words.
Performance Analysis: While the cast delivers competent and professional performances, they are occasionally hampered by a script that leans into familiar archetypes.
Final Verdict: Is it Worth Watching?
Story & Plot Summary: Strictly Ballroom
Quick Plot Summary: Released in 1992, Strictly Ballroom is a Comedy, Drama, Romance film directed by Baz Luhrmann. The narrative brings laughter through sharp writing and comedic timing, providing amusement while touching on deeper societal themes. This summary provides a scannable look at the movie's central conflict involving Paul Mercurio.
Ending Explained: Strictly Ballroom
Ending Breakdown: Directed by Baz Luhrmann, Strictly Ballroom concludes its story with a mix of closure and open interpretation. The finale presents its approach to comedy resolution.
The emotional climax centers on character transformation involving Paul Mercurio, offering viewers material for post-viewing discussion.
Ending Analysis:
- Narrative Resolution: The story concludes by addressing its primary narrative threads, providing closure while maintaining some ambiguity.
- Character Arcs: Character journeys reach their narrative endpoints, reflecting the film's thematic priorities.
- Thematic Payoff: The ending reinforces the comedy themes established throughout the runtime.
The final moments of Strictly Ballroom reflect the filmmakers' creative choices, offering an ending that aligns with the film's tone and style.
Who Should Watch Strictly Ballroom?
Worth Watching If You:
- Enjoy Comedy films and don't mind familiar tropes
- Are a fan of Paul Mercurio or the director
- Want some laughs and light entertainment
Box Office Collection: Strictly Ballroom
| Metric / Region | Collection (Approx) |
|---|---|
| Production Budget | $3.0M |
| Worldwide Gross | $33.9M |
| Trade Verdict | CLEAN HIT |
Strictly Ballroom Budget
The estimated production budget for Strictly Ballroom is $3.0M. This figure covers principal photography, talent acquisitions, and visual effects. When accounting for global marketing and distribution, the break-even point is typically 2x the base production cost.
Top Cast: Strictly Ballroom
All Cast & Crew →








Where to Watch Strictly Ballroom Online?
Streaming Hub📺 Stream on
fuboTV🎟️ Rent on
Amazon Video
Apple TV Store
Google Play Movies
YouTube
Fandango At Home🏷️ Buy on
Amazon Video
Apple TV Store
Google Play Movies
YouTube
Fandango At HomeStrictly Ballroom Parents Guide & Age Rating
1992 AdvisoryWondering about Strictly Ballroom age rating or if it's safe for kids? Here is our cinematic advisory:
⏱️ Runtime & Duration
The total runtime of Strictly Ballroom is 94 minutes (1h 34m). Ensuring you have enough time for the full cinematic experience.
Verdict Summary
Analyzing the overall audience sentiment, verified rating of 6.6/10, and global performance metrics, Strictly Ballroom is classified as a HIT. It remains an essential part of the 1992 cinematic calendar.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Strictly Ballroom worth watching?
Strictly Ballroom is definitely worth watching if you enjoy Comedy movies. It has a verified rating of 6.6/10 and stands as a HIT in our box office analysis.
Where can I find Strictly Ballroom parents guide and age rating?
The official parents guide for Strictly Ballroom identifies it as PG. Our detailed advisory section above covers all content warnings for families.
What is the total runtime of Strictly Ballroom?
The total duration of Strictly Ballroom is 94 minutes, which is approximately 1h 34m long.
Best Movies to Watch if you liked Strictly Ballroom
How Strictly Ballroom Compares & Where it Ranks
Critic Reviews for Strictly Ballroom
Part 1 of Baz Luhrmann's Red Curtain Trilogy: 'Strictly Ballroom'. Entertaining! It's as if 'Dirty Dancing' and 'Blades of Glory' had a baby. The comedic parts work better than the more romantic parts, but all in all it's an enjoyable watch - even for someone who holds no interest in dance. It's also extremely predictable, but that doesn't trouble the film one bit. Debutants, like Luhrmann himself, Paul Mercurio (Scott) and Tara Morice (Fran) work well together, with Bill Hunter being the standout support; though he doesn't top his performance in 2003 classic 'Kangaroo Jack'. Sorry not sorry.
Rarely can one movie be credited with resurrecting an entire genre of programming, but this one certainly reinvigorated media - and participatory - interest in the reputationally staid pursuit of ballroom dancing. The young, accomplished and handsome "Scott" (Paul Mercurio) is determined to get to the top and to do it his way. He is not content to stick with the status quo as defined by the ageing committee led by the buffoon that is "Barry Fife" (Bill Hunter). His parents are sceptical, but when he alights on "Fran" (Tara Morice) then the championships are in their sights and the rules are there to be broken. Baz Luhrmann allows the cast and the dancing to do the work here. The dialogue is earthy, and witty at times but for the most part there is plenty of dancing that illustrates well the tough regimen of discipline required to perform at the highest levels in what is generally considered a rather sedate pastime. There are strong supporting characters a-plenty - not least his mother "Shirley" (Pat Thomson) and rather shrinking violet father "Doug" (Barry Otto) to complement the really rather excellent Hunter (and his toupé). It packs loads into ninety minutes and uses a fine soundtrack to help keep the whole thing moving along entertainingly.
**A film that remains fresh and enjoyable, even if the plot suffers from irritating clichés and other problems.** Dance is one of those arts that is occasionally portrayed in cinema, and this film is reasonably similar to others that focus on ballroom dancing and major dance competitions (I'm thinking of the most obvious example, “Shall We Dance”, but there are others). Directed by Baz Luhrmann, it is one of the least acclaimed films of this director's career, but the fact that it went unnoticed does not take away from its qualities: it is undoubtedly a good film to watch and the story it tells us is still fresh. It's not worth summarizing the plot, which centers on a young adult, under intense pressure to win an important dance prize, and the relationship he establishes with his newly discovered dance partner who quickly becomes his girlfriend. However, this young man wants to dance without feeling tied to the meticulous execution of already established steps and choreographies. This displeases the president of the Australian Dance Federation, who sees this creativity as a rebellious act against the codes of ballroom dancing. The film is a very effective romantic comedy, with very witty and engaging moments that work wonderfully well. The energy and joy that emanates is contagious and makes the pace faster, but the romantic plot is cliché and leaves the film predictable to the point of absurdity. If the script has its weaknesses, this is largely compensated by the well-structured and remarkable work of the actors: let's forget the fact that even the glasses of Fran, Tara Morice's character, are an old soap opera's cliché, and see the work that she develops: although it is not an award-worthy effort, it is undoubtedly positive. Paul Mercurio, the main actor, is sullen and even rude towards his partner and other people. We also can't ignore that he doesn't have any kind of charisma (maybe that's why this actor wasn't successful), but he establishes a very good working relationship with Morice, and they develop harmoniously together. The secondary actors had better luck with the characters: Bill Hunter has the right to a very interesting character, with grotesque but well-crafted nuances, and Pat Thomson also did a well-done job. On a technical level, the film stands out not only for the excellence of its soundtrack, where I would like to highlight the version of “Time After Time” (a classic that never leaves the ears of those who lived through the 80s and 90s), but also for the good quality of the sets, costumes and props used. I don't know if the film had a very high budget, but it can be seen that there was a strong and consistent investment in these elements, particularly in the construction of the spaces and the design of the dresses and dance costumes used in the competition scenes.
movieMx Verified
This review has been verified for accuracy and editorial quality by our senior cinematic analysts.
This analysis is compiled by our editorial experts using multi-source verification and audience sentiment data for maximum accuracy.









