Terminal Review: Story, Cast, Rating & Final Verdict
Last updated: May 9, 2026
Movie Overview: Terminal
| Movie | Terminal |
| Release Year | 1996 |
| Director | Larry Elikann |
| Genre | Horror / TV Movie / Thriller |
| Runtime | 90 minutes (1h 30m) |
| Language | EN |
Quick Verdict: Hit or Flop?
Is Terminal (1996) worth watching? According to our cinematic analysis, the film stands as a AVERAGE with a verified audience rating of 4.8/10. Whether you're looking for the box office collection, ending explained, or parents guide, our review covers everything you need to know about this Horror.
Cast & Character Study
The performances in Terminal are led by Doug Savant . The supporting cast, including Nia Peeples and Michael Ironside , provides the necessary layers to the central narrative.
movieMx Verdict: Is it Worth Your Time?
What Works in the Movie
While Terminal does not fully realize its potential, it still contains moments that may appeal to viewers who enjoy Horror films.
- Interesting concept or premise
- Some entertaining scenes
- Supporting cast delivers occasional highlights
What Doesn't Work
Despite its strengths, Terminal has a few issues that may affect the overall viewing experience, particularly in terms of pacing and narrative consistency.
- Uneven pacing in certain parts of the film
- Some predictable plot developments
- May not appeal to audiences outside the Horror fanbase
Story & Plot Summary: Terminal
Quick Plot Summary: Released in 1996, Terminal is a Horror, TV Movie, Thriller film directed by Larry Elikann. The narrative crafts an atmosphere of dread and suspense, using psychological terror and visual scares. It provides a scannable look at the movie's central conflict involving Doug Savant as Dr. Sean O'Grady.
Ending Explained: Terminal
Terminal Ending Explained: Directed by Larry Elikann, Terminal attempts to bring together the film’s narrative threads. The ending highlights the core horror themes developed throughout the film.
The final twist encourages viewers to reconsider earlier moments in the story, particularly in scenes involving Doug Savant. The interpretation of the ending may vary among viewers.
Key Elements of the Ending
- Narrative Resolution: The story resolves its primary conflict while leaving room for interpretation.
- Character Development: Character motivations become clearer by the final scenes.
- Thematic Message: The ending reinforces the horror themes introduced earlier in the film.
The final moments of Terminal reflect the creative choices of the filmmakers and align with the tone of the narrative.
Who Should Watch Terminal?
Age Advisory: Rated Not Rated.
Consider Watching If:
- You're a completist for Horror films
- You're curious despite mixed reviews
- You have low expectations and want casual entertainment
Terminal Parents Guide & Age Rating
1996 AdvisoryWondering about Terminal age rating or if it's safe for kids? Here is our cinematic advisory:
⏱️ Runtime & Duration
The total runtime of Terminal (1996) is 90 minutes (1h 30m). Directed by Larry Elikann, the film runs for 90 minutes in its complete theatrical version.
Verdict Summary
Analyzing the overall audience sentiment, verified rating of 4.8/10, and global performance metrics, Terminal is classified as a AVERAGE. It remains an essential part of the 1996 cinematic calendar.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Terminal worth watching?
Terminal is definitely worth watching if you enjoy Horror movies. It has a verified rating of 4.8/10 and stands as a AVERAGE in our box office analysis.
Where can I find Terminal parents guide and age rating?
The official parents guide for Terminal identifies it as Not Rated. Our detailed advisory section above covers all content warnings for families.
What is the runtime of Terminal (1996)?
The runtime of Terminal (1996) is 90 minutes (approximately 1h 30m).
movieMx Verified
This review has been verified for accuracy and editorial quality by our senior cinematic analysts.
This analysis is compiled by our editorial experts using multi-source verification and audience sentiment data for maximum accuracy.
