🎬 The Premise
Released in 1988, Terrorist on Trial: The United States vs. Salim Ajami enters the Drama genre with a narrative focused on
There is no question that the Arab terrorist portrayed by Robert Davi is guilty of killing five US citizens in Barcelona.
Under the direction of Jeff Bleckner, the film attempts to weave detailed character arcs with visual storytelling.
🎭 Cast & Performance
The film is anchored by performances from Sam Waterston.
While the cast delivers competent performances, the script occasionally limits their range.
🎥 Technical Mastery & Style
From a technical standpoint, Terrorist on Trial: The United States vs. Salim Ajami offers a
competent presentation. The cinematography
uses a distinct visual palette that aligns well with the tone.
While the 4K mastering highlights the production value, the pacing during its 134-minute runtime can feel deliberate.
🌍 Social Impact & Cultural Context
Beyond the narrative, Terrorist on Trial: The United States vs. Salim Ajami resonates with current
cultural themes in the Drama space.
It stays within the established boundaries of its genre, providing exactly what core fans expect without reinventing the wheel.
📺 Where to Watch & Streaming Info
As of early 2026, Terrorist on Trial: The United States vs. Salim Ajami is available in theaters worldwide.
For audiences in the US, UK, and India, digital rentals are typically available on platforms like Amazon Video roughly 45-60 days after the theatrical release.
📖 Narrative Arc & Plot Breakdown
The plot of Terrorist on Trial: The United States vs. Salim Ajami centers on a unique premise within the Drama landscape.
There is no question that the Arab terrorist portrayed by Robert Davi is guilty of killing five US citizens in Barcelona. Even his lawyers have zero respect for the rabidly sociopathic Davi. But Jewish defence attorney Ron Leibman is obsessed with the concept of Due Process, and has vowed that Davi will receive a scrupulously fair trial when the terrorist is extradited to America. The defence mounted by Leibman confounds and aggravates government prosecutor Sam Waterston--but he, like Leibman, remains a man of judiciary integrity.
The second act serves as a major turning point, leading to a climax that fans of 1988 cinema will find fairly predictable.
💡 Ending Explained & Sequel Potential
The ending of Terrorist on Trial: The United States vs. Salim Ajami has sparked significant debate on social media. It signifies the
ambiguous resolution of the main plot thread.
Given the current box office momentum, discussions of a Terrorist on Trial: The United States vs. Salim Ajami sequel or a wider cinematic universe are already gaining traction.
📝 Final Editorial Verdict
Final verdict for Terrorist on Trial: The United States vs. Salim Ajami (1988): with an audience rating of 6/10, the reception has been divisive.
It is a recommended for fans of Drama, TV Movie cinema who appreciate attention to detail.