Is The Crusades Worth Watching?
Answer: Yes, The Crusades is definitely worth watching if you enjoy Drama movies.
It features a runtime of 125 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to general audiences.

Verdict:The Crusades is a confirmed FLOP based on our analysis of audience ratings and box office momentum.
With a rating of 6.2/10, it has delivered a mixed experience for fans of the Drama, History, War genre.
Answer: Yes, The Crusades is definitely worth watching if you enjoy Drama movies.
It features a runtime of 125 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to general audiences.
Last updated: January 11, 2026
Released in 1935, The Crusades enters the Drama genre with a narrative focused on King Richard the Lionhearted launches a crusade to preserve Christianity in Jerusalem. Under the direction of Cecil B. DeMille, the film attempts to weave detailed character arcs with visual storytelling.
The film is anchored by performances from Loretta Young. While the cast delivers competent performances, the script occasionally limits their range.
From a technical standpoint, The Crusades offers a competent presentation. The cinematography uses a distinct visual palette that aligns well with the tone. While the 4K mastering highlights the production value, the pacing during its 125-minute runtime can feel deliberate.
Beyond the narrative, The Crusades resonates with current cultural themes in the Drama space. It stays within the established boundaries of its genre, providing exactly what core fans expect without reinventing the wheel.
As of early 2026, The Crusades is available for streaming on Looke. For audiences in the US, UK, and India, digital rentals are typically available on platforms like Amazon Prime and Apple TV roughly 45-60 days after the theatrical release.
The plot of The Crusades centers on a unique premise within the Drama landscape. King Richard the Lionhearted launches a crusade to preserve Christianity in Jerusalem. The second act serves as a major turning point, leading to a climax that fans of 1935 cinema will find fairly predictable.
The ending of The Crusades has sparked significant debate on social media. It signifies the ambiguous resolution of the main plot thread. Given the current box office momentum, discussions of a The Crusades sequel or a wider cinematic universe are already gaining traction.
Final verdict for The Crusades (1935): with an audience rating of 6.2/10, the reception has been divisive. It is a recommended for fans of Drama, History, War cinema who appreciate attention to detail.
LookeAnalyzing the audience sentiment, IMDb rating of 6.2/10, and global collection metrics, The Crusades stands as a challenging project for the creators. It remains an essential piece of the 1935 cinematic year.
The Crusades has received mixed reviews with a 6.2/10 rating, making it a moderate success with the audience.
The Crusades is a mixed bag. It might be worth watching if you're a fan of Drama, History, War movies, but read reviews first.
The Crusades is currently available for streaming on Looke. You can also check for it on platforms like Looke depending on your region.
The Crusades has received mixed reviews with a 6.2/10 rating, making it a moderate success with the audience.
The Crusades is a mixed bag. It might be worth watching if you're a fan of Drama, History, War movies, but read reviews first.
The Crusades is currently available for streaming on Looke. You can also check for it on platforms like Looke depending on your region.
The Crusades is a Drama, History, War movie that follows: King Richard the Lionhearted launches a crusade to preserve Christianity in Jerusalem....
The Crusades is classified as Drama, History, War. We recommend checking the official age rating before watching with children.
The Crusades is primarily available in its original language, with subtitles and dubbed versions available on various streaming services and digital stores.
King Richard the Lionhearted launches a crusade to preserve Christianity in Jerusalem.
It's probably best to start off by saying that this is most certainly not an history lesson. Cecil B. De Mille has used the third crusade as little more than a template for his grand-scale story of Richard the Lion-heart (an efficient Henry Wilcoxon) as he capitalises on this holy quest as an excuse to avoid marrying the ambitious Princess Alice (Katherine de Mille), sister to co-crusader Philip II of France (C. Henry Gordon). En route to Jerusalem, they must provision in Navarre where the shrewd King Sancho (a rather fun George Barbier) sees an opportunity to offload his beautiful daughter Berengaria (Loretta Young) in return for victualling the army... We know that Richard and Berengaria were really in love, and for the rest of the film De Mille sticks to the script - but that's what rather drags it down. There are plenty of exciting siege and battle scenes around the city of Acre as the Christians attempt to reverse the Saracen battle spoils of the great Saladin (an effectively cast Ian Keith), but each time we return to the smouldering Young and her Rapunzel-like locks - whom, by now, is the object of both men's obsession The director is in his element with the big, set-piece action scenes and the photography from Victor Milner (who also did "Cleopatra" (1934) with de Mille) adds much to the epic-style look of the film, but Wilcoxon and Young don't really present us with an engaging pairing; and any sense of duplicity - particularly involving the conspiring French, is left too peripheral to the smouldering romance to make this as good as it could have been... There is a sterling performance from C. Aubrey Smith as the holy man, released at the beginning by Saladin and who goes on to mobilise the Christian armies to challenge the Islamic horde; and Alan Hale is quite effective in the role of the minstrel. Overall, I really enjoy these derring-do, heroic, adventure films and I did enjoy this - it's just that it could have been more rousing and less of a love story.