The Flesh and the Fiends backdrop - movieMx Review
The Flesh and the Fiends movie poster - The Flesh and the Fiends review and rating on movieMx
196094 minHorror

The Flesh and the Fiends

Is The Flesh and the Fiends a Hit or Flop?

HIT

Is The Flesh and the Fiends worth watching? With a rating of 6.5/10, this Horror film is a must-watch hit for fans of the genre. Read on for our detailed analysis and user reviews.

6.555 votes
RateYour rating
Advertisement

The Flesh and the Fiends Synopsis

Edinburgh surgeon Dr. Robert Knox requires cadavers for his research into the functioning of the human body; local ne'er-do-wells Burke and Hare find ways to provide him with fresh specimens...

Advertisement

Top Cast

Peter Cushing
Peter CushingDr. Robert Knox
Donald Pleasence
Donald PleasenceWilliam Hare
George Rose
George RoseWilliam Burke
June Laverick
June LaverickMartha Knox
Renée Houston
Renée HoustonHelen Burke
Dermot Walsh
Dermot WalshDr. Geoffrey Mitchell
Billie Whitelaw
Billie WhitelawMary Patterson
John Cairney
John CairneyChris Jackson
Melvyn Hayes
Melvyn HayesDaft Jamie
June Powell
June PowellMaggie O'Hara

Official Trailer

Frequently Asked Questions

Is The Flesh and the Fiends worth watching?

The Flesh and the Fiends has received mixed reviews with a 6.5/10 rating. It might be worth watching if you're a fan of Horror movies.

Is The Flesh and the Fiends hit or flop?

The Flesh and the Fiends has received average ratings (6.5/10), performing moderately with audiences.

What genre is The Flesh and the Fiends?

The Flesh and the Fiends is a Horror movie that Edinburgh surgeon Dr. Robert Knox requires cadavers for his research into the functioning of the human body; local ne'er-do-wells Burke and Hare find ...

You Might Also Like

Explore More

Critic Reviews

WuchakFeb 27, 2025
★ 6

**_Peter Cushing’s missing Frankenstein flick, sort of_** In 1828 Edinburgh, an ambitious doctor of anatomy (Peter Cushing) needs corpses for his work, which are dubiously supplied by two base men (Donald Pleasence and George Rose). This can’t end well. Shot in B&W (unfortunately), "The Flesh and the Fiends" (1960) is based on the infamous Burke and Hare murders and has been released under various other titles, like “Psycho Killers” and “Mania.” It was the first horror flick to feature Cushing not produced by Hammer Films, but it was shot at one of the studios that Hammer used in the greater London area and involved some of the same talent (at the time or in the near future), such as director John Gilling. So, naturally, it’s similar to a Hammer film. It's most comparable to Cushing’s Frankenstein movies since Dr. Robert Knox comes across as a real-life version of Baron Victor Frankenstein, not to mention the events take place just a decade after the publication of Mary Shelley’s Gothic novel. For those not in the know, Cushing starred as Dr. Frankenstein in six Hammer films between 1957-1974. Being based on a true story, this lacks the sensationalism of Hammer horror; it’s unsurprisingly more dramatic and mundane. Yet I liked how Dr. Knox is fleshed out (similar to Cushing’s Victor Frankenstein), as well as the side story involving one of Knox’s Med students (John Cairney) falling for a wild lower-class lass of the taverns (Billie Whitelaw). There are two versions of the film with the “continental version” featuring nudity that was surprising for a flick shot in 1959, which mostly consists of female top nudity; but there are also a few shots of a couple women totally nude, like one walking around the tavern in the background. Of course, such (tame) nudity was nothing new in cinema if you’ve seen 1934’s “Tarzan and His Mate,” but the Hays Code put the kibosh on it in America until the late 60s and the BBFC did the same in the UK. It runs 1 hour, 35 minutes, and was shot at Shepperton Studios, just southwest of London. (The censored version runs a minute shorter while the version called “The Fiendish Ghouls” cuts out some 23 minutes). GRADE: B-