The Rainmaker
Performance & Direction: The Rainmaker Review
Last updated: February 27, 2026
Quick Verdict: Hit or Flop?
Is The Rainmaker (1956) worth watching? According to our cinematic analysis, the film stands as a HIT with a verified audience rating of 6.7/10. Whether you're looking for the box office collection, ending explained, or parents guide, our review covers everything you need to know about this Romance.
Cast Performances: A Masterclass
The success of any Romance is often anchored by its ensemble, and The Rainmaker features a noteworthy lineup led by Burt Lancaster . Supported by the likes of Katharine Hepburn and Wendell Corey , the performances bring a palpable realism to the scripted words.
Performance Analysis: While the cast delivers competent and professional performances, they are occasionally hampered by a script that leans into familiar archetypes.
Final Verdict: Is it Worth Watching?
Story & Plot Summary: The Rainmaker
Quick Plot Summary: Released in 1956, The Rainmaker is a Romance, Western film directed by Joseph Anthony. The narrative explores the complexities of love and relationships with emotional depth and authenticity. This summary provides a scannable look at the movie's central conflict involving Burt Lancaster.
Ending Explained: The Rainmaker
Ending Breakdown: Directed by Joseph Anthony, The Rainmaker concludes its story with a mix of closure and open interpretation. The finale presents its approach to romance resolution.
The conclusion addresses the core thematic questions involving Burt Lancaster, offering viewers material for post-viewing discussion.
Ending Analysis:
- Narrative Resolution: The story concludes by addressing its primary narrative threads, providing closure while maintaining some ambiguity.
- Character Arcs: Character journeys reach their narrative endpoints, reflecting the film's thematic priorities.
- Thematic Payoff: The ending reinforces the romance themes established throughout the runtime.
The final moments of The Rainmaker reflect the filmmakers' creative choices, offering an ending that aligns with the film's tone and style.
Who Should Watch The Rainmaker?
Worth Watching If You:
- Enjoy Romance films and don't mind familiar tropes
- Are a fan of Burt Lancaster or the director
- Want solid genre entertainment
Top Cast: The Rainmaker
All Cast & Crew →











Where to Watch The Rainmaker Online?
Streaming Hub🎟️ Rent on
Amazon VideoThe Rainmaker Parents Guide & Age Rating
1956 AdvisoryWondering about The Rainmaker age rating or if it's safe for kids? Here is our cinematic advisory:
⏱️ Runtime & Duration
The total runtime of The Rainmaker is 121 minutes (2h 1m). Ensuring you have enough time for the full cinematic experience.
Verdict Summary
Analyzing the overall audience sentiment, verified rating of 6.7/10, and global performance metrics, The Rainmaker is classified as a HIT. It remains an essential part of the 1956 cinematic calendar.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is The Rainmaker worth watching?
The Rainmaker is definitely worth watching if you enjoy Romance movies. It has a verified rating of 6.7/10 and stands as a HIT in our box office analysis.
Where can I find The Rainmaker parents guide and age rating?
The official parents guide for The Rainmaker identifies it as Not Rated. Our detailed advisory section above covers all content warnings for families.
What is the total runtime of The Rainmaker?
The total duration of The Rainmaker is 121 minutes, which is approximately 2h 1m long.
Best Movies to Watch if you liked The Rainmaker
How The Rainmaker Compares & Where it Ranks
Critic Reviews for The Rainmaker
There once was an ugly duckling... The Rainmaker is directed by Joseph Anthony and written by N. Richard Nash. It stars Burt Lancaster, Katharine Hepburn, Wendell Corey, Lloyd Bridges, Cameron Prud'Homme and Earl Holliman. Music is by Alex North and VistaVision/Technicolor cinematography is by Charles Lang. Starbuck (Lancaster) is a conman who arrives in the little town of Threepoint and promises to deliver the rain to end the town's crippling drought problem. More telling, perhaps, will be his impact on the Curry family... N. Richard Nash wrote it as a television play and would then see it hit the Broadway stage, so he was the logical choice for screenplay duties here. The film very much feels like a play, with very pronounced acting and sharp dialogue, it's also - at just over two hours in length - far too long for a talky based production. Thirty minutes could quite easily have been shaved off here. There's also the contentious casting of the Oscar Nominated Hepburn, who in many people's eyes - myself included - is miscast and just doesn't sit right in the role, leaving it to Lancaster to bring the flight and breeze to light up the piece. However, to enjoy the art of acting brings some rewards, it's also a pic of crafty humour and features a story of considerable humane substance. That one man, a scallywag, can have such a positive impact on a sterile backwater family, builds nicely to an ending that is a complete joy, a real smile raiser. It's also handsomely photographed by Lang, the colour lensing so smooth, and the production design, backed up by North's most appealing musical score, ensures you know that the makers cared about what they were doing. Relationships on set were initially rocky, but the principal stars would come to be friends and speak fondly of their time on the film. 6/10 Footnote: The material would also be turned into a musical titled 110 in the Shade.
movieMx Verified
This review has been verified for accuracy and editorial quality by our senior cinematic analysts.
This analysis is compiled by our editorial experts using multi-source verification and audience sentiment data for maximum accuracy.










