The Squeeze (1987) movie backdrop
The Squeeze (1987) movie poster
⭐ Rating4.9/10
🎯 Verdict AVERAGE
👍 Good
  • Engaging Storyline
  • Strong Performances
👎 Bad
  • Pacing issues in mid
  • Predictable ending
1987101 minAction, Comedy, Crime, Romance, Thriller
Audience VerdictFLOP

The Squeeze

The Squeeze Movie Hit or Flop?

FLOP

Verdict:The Squeeze is a confirmed FLOP based on our analysis of audience ratings and box office momentum.

With a rating of 4.9/10, it has delivered a mixed experience for fans of the Action, Comedy, Crime, Romance, Thriller genre.

Is The Squeeze Worth Watching?

Answer: Maybe not, The Squeeze is likely a skip if you enjoy Action movies.

It features a runtime of 101 minutes and offers a standard storyline that appeals to mature audiences.

4.926 votes
101Minutes
1987Release Year
Visual Story
Advertisement

The Squeeze Review

Last updated: January 12, 2026

🎬 Detailed Premise & Narrative Foundations

Released in the dynamic cinematic landscape of 1987, The Squeeze emerges as a significant entry in the Action, Comedy, Crime, Romance, Thriller domain. The narrative core of the film focuses on a sophisticated exploration of Harry Berg is both a con artist and an actual artist -- he constructs large sculptures out of television sets -- but he is not particularly successful in either role. Unlike standard genre fare, The Squeeze attempts to deconstruct traditional tropes, offering a conventional take on its central themes.

The screenplay, appearing to prioritize narrative momentum and immediate impact, sets a stage where the stakes feel personal yet universal. Under the directorial eye of Roger Young, every scene is crafted to contribute to the atmospheric weight of the story, ensuring that the Action elements serve the larger narrative arc rather than just providing spectacle.

🎭 Cast Performances: A Masterclass in Character Study

The success of any Action is often anchored by its ensemble, and The Squeeze features a noteworthy lineup led by Michael Keaton. Supported by the likes of Rae Dawn Chong and Joe Pantoliano, the performances bring a palpable realism to the scripted words.

Performance Analysis: While the cast delivers competent and professional performances, they are occasionally hampered by a script that leans into familiar archetypes. However, the sheer charisma of Michael Keaton, Rae Dawn Chong, Joe Pantoliano manages to keep the audience invested through the film's more predictable sequences. In the broader context of 1987 cinema, these performances stand as a testament to the evolving standards of acting within the Action, Comedy, Crime, Romance, Thriller space.

🎥 Directorial Vision & Technical Craftsmanship

From a technical perspective, The Squeeze is a marvel of 21st-century filmmaking. The cinematography, utilizing a moody and atmospheric color palette, significantly enhances the world-building aspects of the production. Each frame seems calculated to guide the viewer's emotional response, whether through wide, sweeping vistas or tight, claustrophobic close-ups that emphasize character isolation.

Technical Excellence: The production design and visual effects provide a solid foundation for the story, ensuring that the world of the film feels lived-in and authentic, even when the narrative logic falters. Furthermore, the sonic landscape—comprising both the score and sound design—adds a layer of subtextual narrative that rewards attentive viewers.

📜 Narrative Pacing & Structural Integrity

The structure of The Squeeze follows a sophisticated brisk pace. Over its 101 minute duration, the film manages to balance exposition with action in a way that remains consistently entertaining. The second act, often the most difficult to manage, serves here as a crucible for character growth, leading toward a climax that feels both inevitable and surprising.

Critically, the editing choices by the team help maintain a narrative tension that rarely wavers. The sharp, concise editing ensures that not a single frame is wasted, making the film ideal for a modern audience that values efficiency in storytelling.

🌍 Cultural Impact & Global Resonance

Beyond its immediate entertainment value, The Squeeze resonates with contemporary social and cultural themes prevalent in the Action landscape of 2026. It addresses concepts such as the nature of heroism and personal legacy with a level of maturity that is often missing from major releases.

This cultural relevance is likely why it has garnered a 4.9/10 rating on our platform. Films like this bridge the gap between niche interest and global appeal, proving that stories rooted in specific human experiences can find a home with audiences worldwide, from the US and UK to India and beyond.

📖 Plot Breakdown & Philosophical Subtext

Analyzing the plot deeper, The Squeeze is more than just its synopsis. It is an inquiry into nature of power. Harry Berg is both a con artist and an actual artist -- he constructs large sculptures out of television sets -- but he is not particularly successful in either role. He owes some money, which gets him involved with Rachel Dobs, a police detective who works with a collection agency. When Harry comes into possession of a strange parcel, both the con man and the detective find themselves wrapped up in a sinister corporate plot to fix the lottery.

The philosophical underpinnings of the third act suggest a worldview that is standard for its genre yet executed with high professional polish. This is not just a commercial product; it is a piece of art that invites discussion long after the credits have finished rolling.

💡 Final Verdict: Is it Worth Watching?

In summary, our editorial assessment of The Squeeze (1987) is overwhelmingly negative. With an audience rating of 4.9/10 and strong performance metrics in the Action, Comedy, Crime, Romance, Thriller categories, it stands as a highly recommended experience for genre enthusiasts.

Whether you choose to experience it for the stellar performances from Michael Keaton, Rae Dawn Chong, Joe Pantoliano or the visual majesty of its technical execution, The Squeeze is a significant contribution to the cinema of 1987. It represents the kind of filmmaking that movieMx is proud to champion—original, bold, and ultimately, deeply human.

The Squeeze Box Office Collection

Metric / RegionCollection (Approx)
Worldwide Gross $2,228,951
Trade Verdict FINANCIAL DISAPPOINTMENT

Where to Watch The Squeeze Online?

Streaming Hub

🎟️ Rent on

Apple TVApple TV
Amazon VideoAmazon Video

🏷️ Buy on

Apple TVApple TV

Parents Guide & Age Rating

PG-13
The Squeeze is rated PG-13. Parents should be aware that it contains violence, action sequences, mature themes, romantic content. Some material may be inappropriate for children under 13.

Final Verdict

Analyzing the audience sentiment, IMDb rating of 4.9/10, and global collection metrics, The Squeeze stands as a challenging project for the creators. It remains an essential piece of the 1987 cinematic year.

Official Trailer

Frequently Asked Questions

Is The Squeeze movie hit or flop?

The Squeeze is considered a flop based on audience ratings of 4.9/10 and lower collections.

Is The Squeeze worth watching?

Based on the low rating of 4.9/10, The Squeeze may not be worth watching unless you are a die-hard fan.

Where can I watch The Squeeze online?

The Squeeze may be available for rent or purchase on digital platforms like Apple TV, Google Play, or Amazon Prime Video. Specific streaming availability can vary by country.

Explore More Verdicts

Expert Consensus
Live Rating
MOVIEMX
★ 4.9
The Squeeze
<a href="https://moviemx.in/review/the-squeeze-109161" target="_blank" style="text-decoration:none;"><div style="background:#121212;border:1px solid #f5c518;border-radius:12px;padding:15px;width:180px;text-align:center;font-family:sans-serif;box-shadow:0 10px 20px rgba(0,0,0,0.3);"><div style="color:#f5c518;font-size:10px;font-weight:900;letter-spacing:2px;">MOVIEMX</div><div style="color:white;font-size:28px;font-weight:900;margin:8px 0;">★ 4.9</div><div style="color:#888;font-size:12px;font-weight:500;">The Squeeze</div></div></a>

Share this rating on your blog or website. Includes a 100% organic backlink.

Synopsis

Harry Berg is both a con artist and an actual artist -- he constructs large sculptures out of television sets -- but he is not particularly successful in either role. He owes some money, which gets him involved with Rachel Dobs, a police detective who works with a collection agency. When Harry comes into possession of a strange parcel, both the con man and the detective find themselves wrapped up in a sinister corporate plot to fix the lottery.